UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
He has no point. He just wanders from lie to lie.What does that have to do with your claim that at some point the US government had no tax system? Disingenuous.
He has no point. He just wanders from lie to lie.What does that have to do with your claim that at some point the US government had no tax system? Disingenuous.
did they colloctivise the colonies or did the colonies volunteer to unionize and remain sovereign?They collectivised the 13 colonies to create a national army. Democracy is a collective. To give the government any power is collectivist. Still collectivist, still progressive.
You operate under the false assumption that collectivism is always wrong. It is you that is mislabeling anything you don't like as progressive and collectivist.
lolHere you go. Even referencing John Locke and the Whigs. Specifically being called Libertarianism in the 1700s, going back to Lao Tzu.
View attachment 4023733 View attachment 4023734View attachment 4023741
Do you ever stop lying? Ever?kaepernick says he's going to stand now if someone offers him a job.
So there was no such thing as libertarianism in the 1700s, the ideas of classical liberalism of the 1700s are what libertarianism used as a basis in the 1960s.Here you go. Even referencing John Locke and the Whigs. Specifically being called Libertarianism in the 1700s, going back to Lao Tzu.
View attachment 4023733 View attachment 4023734View attachment 4023741
How was I supposed to know you meant income tax? You just said "paid no taxes." Voluntary taxes aren't what those other taxes are called. Maybe you mean indirect taxes. You were pointing to some retarded libertarian fantasy land that never existed.I said without tax referencing the income tax, and conceded voluntary taxes were always a given. duties, imports ect.
would you like me to be disingenuous? I could try.
Nazi Nazi pedo Hitler antisemitic mysoginy racism and shit.....there that should comfort most in the room.
They didn't remain sovereign, they allowed the feds to tax them and draft their citizens to the national military.did they colloctivise the colonies or did the colonies volunteer to unionize and remain sovereign?
seems like two opposing concepts.
granting government limited power to uphold individual rights is hardly a collectivist movement.
democracy isn't always a collective either....unless you think being part of the collective should be compulsory.
I guess ESPN doesn't. lolDo you ever stop lying? Ever?
No reply to this @twostrokenut ? Why are you unable to engage my arguments?Unusual evil and calamity. Also like a Great Depression and a two-tiered economy of haves and have nots.
Explain the unlimimited government part. I'm not following what you are saying.
It's funny how fast you gave up arguing against my list.progressivism is a collectivist movement so let's start at the top of your list. a revolution to limit the powers of government, indeed to enumerate them is quite the opposite of collectivist given the government is of and by the people.
simply labeling things you like that get accomplished as progress doesn't make them progressive.
If we eliminate the income tax I will consider that progress, so I'm therefore progressive. nope.
promote the general welfare clause is a great example, as is the interstate commerce clause and supremacy.
a document intended to bind the government, interpreted at certain points to construe the government as unlimited.
progress. and progressive.
ESPN is not a news organization you dolt.I guess ESPN doesn't. lol
defense was considered "the blessing of ordinary society and civil government".No reply to this @twostrokenut ? Why are you unable to engage my arguments?
Here comes the cypticism. Why can't you stay point? Now who is the condescending ass? Disingenuous.defense was considered "the blessing of ordinary society and civil government".
at least you're using a period dictionary now and that's progress therefore I am a progressive.
yep. it's on point though. being somewhat of a condescending ass is about 1/100th of the hate vomit you've spewed at me in the last few days. I'm glad we are maintaining this level of cordiality in conversation though. it's progressive no?Here comes the cypticism. Why can't you stay point? Now who is the condescending ass? Disingenuous.
So the new alt right tactic is playing reverse racism victim so you don't come across as outright Nazis.yep. it's on point though. being somewhat of a condescending ass is about 1/100th of the hate vomit you've spewed at me in the last few days. I'm glad we are maintaining this level of cordiality in conversation though. it's progressive no?
I addressed your entire list twice. the American revolution was individualist, not collectivist; as evidenced by history and the founding documents.It's funny how fast you gave up arguing against my list.
idk, do you have some example of what your babbling about? that would help.So the new alt right tactic is playing reverse racism victim so you don't come across as outright Nazis.
market forces