Trump's Wag the Dog Moment; Syrian chemical attack was a false flag!

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I posted my evidence many times. I notice you refute nothing, you just name-call and shit post.
That article you posted isn't evidence. It's an article by a professional conspiracy theorist. The author wrote a whole book about the international community's claim regarding Iran's effort to build the capability of making a nuclear bomb is all a lie. He writes his lies very well, but liars lie. Before accepting something as truth you have to be able to trust the source.

For laughs, tell me again how the UN commission on Syria is the same as GWB's team of liars. UN inspectors in Iraq said they had not found WMD just a few months before Powell made his presentation saying WMD exist. Th UN inspectors got it right and said so, retard.
 

oswizzle

Well-Known Member
holoHOAX

Chinese lost like 20 Million Proven deaths and dont cry poor me 24-7

Russians lost Millions as well....again no Oscar award winning Movie and Grammy Award for the WW2 Soundtrack to help make u feel bad for something never proven ZERO PROOF BRO ...HOAX
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
holoHOAX

Chinese lost like 20 Million Proven deaths and dont cry poor me 24-7

Russians lost Millions as well....again no Oscar award winning Movie and Grammy Award for the WW2 Soundtrack to help make u feel bad for something never proven ZERO PROOF BRO ...HOAX
What language are you speaking? This makes absolutely no sense.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
It seems that all of the chemical weapons attacks in the last several years were either faked or false flags.


The implications of this, as well as the fact that the mainstream media have been reporting a story they know isn't true AND there has been a witch-hunt against 'alternative media'- anyone who does not parrot the party line- adds up to a very disturbing picture of American defense and media organs' collusion to deceive the American People and manufacture approval for the ongoing war crimes in Syria.

Yes, attacking another nation without provocation is a war crime; it's exactly the same thing Hitler did to Poland in 1939.

This is what World War looks like in the 21st century. John Pilger is calling it World War III... he makes a strong case;
 

travisw

Well-Known Member
It seems that all of the chemical weapons attacks in the last several years were either faked or false flags.


The implications of this, as well as the fact that the mainstream media have been reporting a story they know isn't true AND there has been a witch-hunt against 'alternative media'- anyone who does not parrot the party line- adds up to a very disturbing picture of American defense and media organs' collusion to deceive the American People and manufacture approval for the ongoing war crimes in Syria.

Yes, attacking another nation without provocation is a war crime; it's exactly the same thing Hitler did to Poland in 1939.

This is what World War looks like in the 21st century. John Pilger is calling it World War III... he makes a strong case;
Do you concur with Pilger's assessment that President Barack Obama is a glossy Uncle Tom? If so, why?

https://web.archive.org/web/20080131081440/http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=471

You like all his Russia Today attacks on the BBC too?
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
The biggest problem with these so-called "chemical" attacks is the footage they show. It's pretty clearly fake.

First and foremost, all they ever show you are people pouring water over kids heads and face. They use children because it outrages people a lot more than adult victims do.

But most importantly, the chemical they "claim" to be using is sarin gas. It clearly is not.

In every video of all these "dose a kid in the face and head with a garden hose" they do, look at the kids. I mean REALLY look at them.

  • Their skin is not discolored in any way.
  • They seem to be perfectly calm for the most part, other than slightly inconvenienced by having their heads doused with water.
  • They appear to be breathing just fine.
  • Their eyes aren't discolored in any way.
If they had been hit with a sarin gas attack, they would be dead within minutes for the most part. Those that managed to live would be struggling to breath, and if they didn't get the antidote shot within 10 minutes, they too would die. Their eyes would be swollen shut and their skin would look pasty in appearance as they slowly suffocated to death.

But every video I've ever seen, it's just some adults hosing kids in the eyes that seem to look at the camera a moment, then go on their merry little way like the hose cured it all.

It's fucking sarin gas, allegedly, people...not a cheap, weak can of pepper spray. It takes a shitload more than a garden hose to cure it.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
The biggest problem with these so-called "chemical" attacks is the footage they show. It's pretty clearly fake.

First and foremost, all they ever show you are people pouring water over kids heads and face. They use children because it outrages people a lot more than adult victims do.

But most importantly, the chemical they "claim" to be using is sarin gas. It clearly is not.

In every video of all these "dose a kid in the face and head with a garden hose" they do, look at the kids. I mean REALLY look at them.

  • Their skin is not discolored in any way.
  • They seem to be perfectly calm for the most part, other than slightly inconvenienced by having their heads doused with water.
  • They appear to be breathing just fine.
  • Their eyes aren't discolored in any way.
If they had been hit with a sarin gas attack, they would be dead within minutes for the most part. Those that managed to live would be struggling to breath, and if they didn't get the antidote shot within 10 minutes, they too would die. Their eyes would be swollen shut and their skin would look pasty in appearance as they slowly suffocated to death.

But every video I've ever seen, it's just some adults hosing kids in the eyes that seem to look at the camera a moment, then go on their merry little way like the hose cured it all.

It's fucking sarin gas, allegedly, people...not a cheap, weak can of pepper spray. It takes a shitload more than a garden hose to cure it.
Theyre not claiming he used sarin though, theyre claiming he used chlorine gas.

So they attacked his "sarin production facilities".

Makes sense, eh?

If you're gonna gas people, surely you use the far more lethal stuff...no?
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Chlorine gas is not much different. Those kids would be coughing their brains out and struggling to breath. They would also be sneezing a lot.

None of that happens in ANY of the videos they show. The kids look perfectly fine, other than being soaking wet.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Chlorine gas is not much different. Those kids would be coughing their brains out and struggling to breath. They would also be sneezing a lot.

None of that happens in ANY of the videos they show. The kids look perfectly fine, other than being soaking wet.
For the record I'm not disagreeing with your premise, just the claim is that chlorine was used instead of the Syrian stockpiles of Sarin they keep talking about.

Chlorine is easy to produce anywhere and to me at least implies it wasn't the Govt, because a real nerve agent attack (like the kind they could've committed) wouldn't have left any survivors.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
Too funny listening to all the ass clowns on this thread. Fake gas attack! "No,no, very real but done by the rebels". Let's get one thing clear, someone that would bomb civilians would have no problem using some type of chemical weapon on them, period. Too many determining factors to look at a short video and say it never happened. Thank God none of you are actual investigators, going on personal feelings, hunches and conspiracy theories.
 
Top