Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Collusion is the key word in both of these cases
If Trump colluded with Russia to influence the general election, then shouldn't Clinton be held to the same standard for influencing the Democratic primary?
Is somebody going to legitimately try to argue the point that what Trump did was actually illegal while what Clinton did was only unethical?
If you're a Democrat who condemns Trump for colluding with Russia but gives a free pass to Clinton for colluding with the DNC, what are your actual values? Obviously not protecting democracy.
If Trump colluded with Russia to influence the general election, then shouldn't Clinton be held to the same standard for influencing the Democratic primary?
Is somebody going to legitimately try to argue the point that what Trump did was actually illegal while what Clinton did was only unethical?
If you're a Democrat who condemns Trump for colluding with Russia but gives a free pass to Clinton for colluding with the DNC, what are your actual values? Obviously not protecting democracy.