As soon as you posted this you lost all credibility on this forum, way not cool
why do you say that?
take the 1140 umole that a 600w hps puts out divide that by 1.9 equils 600
divide it by 3.49 umole pes sec you get 326
divide by 4.0 you get 285. you didn't find anything wrong with the umole ratings which is the tougher information to find, after that its just basic math. take the wattage of the light you want to replace divide by the umole gives the wattage you need to replace. 600w hps puts out 1140umole. divide 1140 by the 1.9 (umole for hps) what do you get ......600. 600w at 1.9umole per second is 1140. see how that works? if you divide 3.49 umole/sec (cmh rating) by 1140 ( again that's the total umole/sec of a 600w hps) and you get 326 so that is the wattage of cmh needed to hit 1140 umole/sec
its just simple math. you lose all credibility when you dispute a simple math equasion.
remember at 95 umole/sec/square foot growth becomes limited by the amount of co2 available and it will need to be added to get full potential out of stronger lights. example... don't run over 380w of cob per 4x4 unless you can enrich with co2 (that's a math equasion also let me know if you need it explained
it takes 4 photons to bind 1 molecule of co2. mabe it was the other way around but either way there is only so much co2 in the air and light not bound by co2 is wasted