Mark Blyth, the economist who's making sense

[SneekyNinja]

It's the text of the article she quoted at the top of her post.

I realize the article is too long for you to get through without a nap.

Go to bed, the adults are talking.

Like I'd read any shit you idiots post.

Given up on the solar thing? Realized you're unequipped to debate it?

 

[ttystikk]

Like I'd read any shit you idiots post.

Given up on the solar thing? Realized you're unequipped to debate it?

Hmmmmmm. Willfully ignorant since he's clearly unwilling (unable?) to read any point of view other than that fed to him on his knees.

Then taunts because he's so woefully unqualified to have a conversation about solar power that he doesn't realize he's already been owned, used to wrap the fish and tossed out like yesterday's news.

You aren't worth my time any longer.

 

[mr sunshine]

Sausage party....invite some bitches, fuckers.

 

[SneekyNinja]

Hmmmmmm. Willfully ignorant since he's clearly unwilling (unable?) to read any point of view other than that fed to him on his knees.

Then taunts because he's so woefully unqualified to have a conversation about solar power that he doesn't realize he's already been owned, used to wrap the fish and tossed out like yesterday's news.

You aren't worth my time any longer.

You think I got owned in that discussion?

You always give me a hearty laugh in the early hours.

Dog Kennels of Boundless Delusion...

 

[dagwood45431]

he doesn't realize he's already been owned, used to wrap the fish and tossed out like yesterday's news.

Ummm, yeah, nobody "realized" that. LOL. Delusional dickhead.

 

[SneekyNinja]

So 0 Democrats voted for the tax reform.

Guess you can stick that up your ass tty.

"Republicans and Democrats are the same!!"

"Democrats are beholden to their rich donors"

Suck a dick, mountain man (not that there's anything wrong with that).

 

[Fogdog]

No source just plagiarism in an attempt to look smart.

Fogdog is obviously gone soft on your retards, it's a shame he liked the copy/paste of a known psycho racist, I thought his judgement was better than that.

It wasn't a fucking you-tube video thought guide, so there is that. Also, I agreed with the message. I only oppose what I disagree with, Sneeky. Just saying, save the vitriol for when it's appropriate.

 

[Fogdog]

Hmmmmmm. Willfully ignorant since he's clearly unwilling (unable?) to read any point of view other than that fed to him on his knees.

Then taunts because he's so woefully unqualified to have a conversation about solar power that he doesn't realize he's already been owned, used to wrap the fish and tossed out like yesterday's news.

You aren't worth my time any longer.

LOL

You were the one who went on and on about how efficient Concentrated Solar Power is and missed why it isn't competitive with alternatives. Don't get excited, you didn't own anybody in that conversation.

 

[mr sunshine]

Hmmmmmm. Willfully ignorant since he's clearly unwilling (unable?) to read any point of view other than that fed to him on his knees.

Then taunts because he's so woefully unqualified to have a conversation about solar power that he doesn't realize he's already been owned, used to wrap the fish and tossed out like yesterday's news.

You aren't worth my time any longer.

Why do you want to own everybody? Total control is just an illusion.....in fact, you can only control what people allow you to control, which defeats the purpose of control. You feel me dawg?

 

[Padawanbater2]

Sausage party....invite some bitches, fuckers.

Why refer to women as "bitches"?

 

[SneekyNinja]

Why refer to women as "bitches"?

"Bitches" is a slang term and not denigrating a historically marginalized group, it can also be used for male or female recipients.

 

[Padawanbater2]

"Bitches" is a slang term and not denigrating a historically marginalized group

It denigrates women, an absolutely historically marginalized group

 

[mr sunshine]

Why refer to women as "bitches"?

I meant it as a term of endearment but I can certainly see how that word can be interpreted as something negative. If I offended any ladies I apologize. @Padawanbater2 why do you masterbate to videos of women getting tortured?

 

[Padawanbater2]

I meant it as a term of endearment

According to your friends, it doesn't matter how you meant it. It matters how someone else takes it. I'm offended you would choose to refer to women as "bitches". So that makes you a sexist.

 

[ttystikk]

Why do you want to own everybody? Total control is just an illusion.....in fact, you can only control what people allow you to control, which defeats the purpose of control. You feel me dawg?

You have it backwards. I don't want to control anyone, I want others to do controlling us.

 

[ttystikk]

What you would call me is irrelevant. It's a pejorative that denigrates women. Historically, women have been marginalized. How can you promote using the word in any context?

Because it's cool if he says it.

If you say it, it's not cool and they can clutch their pearls, gasp theatrically and point.

Cuz, you know, hypocrites gotta hypocrite.

 

[ttystikk]

LOL

You were the one who went on and on about how efficient Concentrated Solar Power is and missed why it isn't competitive with alternatives. Don't get excited, you didn't own anybody in that conversation.

I didn't miss anything.

You called The Scientific American magazine 'click bait' and have pointedly ignored the facility's ability to manufacture solar power at night using stored heat.

Stick to your keyboard and mouse, Stinkydigit.

 

[SneekyNinja]

I didn't miss anything.

You called The Scientific American magazine 'click bait' and have pointedly ignored the facility's ability to manufacture solar power at night using stored heat.

Stick to your keyboard and mouse, Stinkydigit.

I said the article was from your Facebook timeline...

But it doesn't matter, you couldn't debate it from a physics/engineering standpoint and got rekt.

It was basically advertising a slightly improved yet old technology to try drum up support and sell it to rubes because PV and lithium battery storage has overtaken it by such a vast degree.

We've lithium cells now with 4400mAh and the $ per watt of PV is actually less than fossil fuels now.

But again, you don't actually know what you're talking about so you don't even know how impressive that is.

 

[ttystikk]

I said the article was from your Facebook timeline...

But it doesn't matter, you couldn't debate it from a physics/engineering standpoint and got rekt.

It was basically advertising a slightly improved yet old technology to try drum up support and sell it to rubes because PV and lithium battery storage has overtaken it by such a vast degree.

We've lithium cells now with 4400mAh and the $ per watt of PV is actually less than fossil fuels now.

But again, you don't actually know what you're talking about so you don't even know how impressive that is.

Your physics is weak and engineering unstable.

I know how well PV is doing. I don't think we need to put all of our eggs into one basket.

May the best tech win. In the early 1900s, electric vehicles were more common than gas powered cars. Gas took over because the tech was better at the time. That calculation may have shifted in cars, the jury is still out. The jury is back for power generation; solar and wind are better. To finish killing fossil fueled power we still need to generate electricity at night when the wind isn't blowing and this could be a viable option. That's why they built the molten sodium prototype.

Longer term, a former NASA engineer has put forward a plan to ring Yellowstone with geothermal power plants and generate electricity while reducing the threat of eruption. That's a plan worth doing, whatever it costs...

 

[SneekyNinja]

Your physics is weak and engineering unstable.

I know how well PV is doing. I don't think we need to put all of our eggs into one basket.

May the best tech win. In the early 1900s, electric vehicles were more common than gas powered cars. Gas took over because the tech was better at the time. That calculation may have shifted in cars, the jury is still out. The jury is back for power generation; solar and wind are better. To finish killing fossil fueled power we still need to generate electricity at night when the wind isn't blowing and this could be a viable option. That's why they built the molten sodium prototype.

Longer term, a former NASA engineer has put forward a plan to ring Yellowstone with geothermal power plants and generate electricity while reducing the threat of eruption. That's a plan worth doing, whatever it costs...

All of our eggs into one basket?

In engineering the most efficient solution is always the best solution, period.

"To some the glass is half empty, to others it is half full. But to the engineer the glass is twice the size it needs to be."