Millionaire Donor Threatens Democratic Party: “If They Go Far Left, I’m Out”

choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you say that like you suddenly disagree with pedophiles even though your party is about to elect one
Click to expand...
My party?
I think "parties" are great fun while you're there in the moment, but after the party has accomplished what it set out to do, you wake to find that you're nauseous, you feel beaten (and most possibly violated), and you regret what little you can remember about the whole affair.

When you have proven evidence of anything outside of the hearsay you deem as unassailable, let me know.
dagwood45431 said:
Get back at me when Pinocchio runs for office, dipshit.
Click to expand...
But he is as long as you accept the fact that money buys power in the US:

Profile for 2016 Election Cycle
View totals for other cycles:

NOTE: Figures on this page include contributions and spending by affiliates of this organization.
CONTRIBUTIONS

$4,314,065
ranks 106 of 18,661
LOBBYING

$3,900,000 (2016)
$3,670,000 (2015)
ranks 122 of 3,766 in 2016
OUTSIDE SPENDING

$0
MEMBERS
INVESTED

45
Explain these rankings to me
CONTRIBUTIONS: $4,314,065


Contributions to candidates: $1,095,045
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $106,050
Contributions to parties: $734,488
Contributions to 527 committees: $116,910
Contributions to outside spending groups: $2,254,672

Top Recipients
Recipient Total From Indivs From Orgs
Conservative Solutions PAC $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0
Clinton, Hillary $395,886 $395,886 $0
DNC Services Corp $290,572 $290,572 $0
Women Vote! $200,587 $200,587 $0
Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte $185,252 $185,252 $0
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte $122,136 $122,136 $0
EMILY's List Non-Federal $116,000 $116,000 $0
League of Conservation Voters $50,000 $50,000 $0
Sanders, Bernie $40,041 $40,041 $0
Harris, Kamala D $38,485 $38,485 $0
VIEW ALL CANDIDATE RECIPIENTS
The total of contributions to candidates from Walt Disney Co individuals is 3 times larger than contributions from PACs


Contributions from Individuals
$812,045


Contributions from PACs
$281,000
LOBBYING: $3,900,000 (2016)

REVOLVING DOOR
19 out of 22 Walt Disney Co lobbyists in 2015-2016 have previously held government jobs
See their employment history by clicking on their RevDoor icon here


BILL MOST FREQUENTLY LOBBIED ON IN THE 114th CONGRESS: H.R.4241 (Copyright Office for the Digital Economy Act)
See more lobbying by Walt Disney Co
Members who own Walt Disney Co shares: 35
 
Last edited:
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
My party?
I think "parties" are great fun while you're there in the moment, but after the party has accomplished what it set out to do, you wake to find that your nauseous, you feel beaten (and most possibly violated), and you regret what little you can remember about the whole affair.

When you have proven evidence of anything outside of the hearsay you deem as unassailable, let me know.

But he is as long as you accept the fact that money buys power in the US:

Profile for 2016 Election Cycle
View totals for other cycles:

NOTE: Figures on this page include contributions and spending by affiliates of this organization.
CONTRIBUTIONS

$4,314,065
ranks 106 of 18,661
LOBBYING

$3,900,000 (2016)
$3,670,000 (2015)
ranks 122 of 3,766 in 2016
OUTSIDE SPENDING

$0
MEMBERS
INVESTED

45
Explain these rankings to me
CONTRIBUTIONS: $4,314,065


Contributions to candidates: $1,095,045
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $106,050
Contributions to parties: $734,488
Contributions to 527 committees: $116,910
Contributions to outside spending groups: $2,254,672

Top Recipients
Recipient Total From Indivs From Orgs
Conservative Solutions PAC $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0
Clinton, Hillary $395,886 $395,886 $0
DNC Services Corp $290,572 $290,572 $0
Women Vote! $200,587 $200,587 $0
Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte $185,252 $185,252 $0
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte $122,136 $122,136 $0
EMILY's List Non-Federal $116,000 $116,000 $0
League of Conservation Voters $50,000 $50,000 $0
Sanders, Bernie $40,041 $40,041 $0
Harris, Kamala D $38,485 $38,485 $0
VIEW ALL CANDIDATE RECIPIENTS
The total of contributions to candidates from Walt Disney Co individuals is 3 times larger than contributions from PACs


Contributions from Individuals
$812,045


Contributions from PACs
$281,000
LOBBYING: $3,900,000 (2016)

REVOLVING DOOR
19 out of 22 Walt Disney Co lobbyists in 2015-2016 have previously held government jobs
See their employment history by clicking on their RevDoor icon here


BILL MOST FREQUENTLY LOBBIED ON IN THE 114th CONGRESS: H.R.4241 (Copyright Office for the Digital Economy Act)
See more lobbying by Walt Disney Co
Members who own Walt Disney Co shares: 35
Click to expand...
Did you figure this out before or after you were radicalized online?
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Then what's your excuse?
Remember, nazi stands for Nationalsozialismus (National Socialism) which seems to be much more akin to your leanings.
Click to expand...
Hitler was a "Socialist" only in the sense that he wanted certain strategic industries either nationalized or strictly regulated.

Oh and using big infrastructure works to make jobs.
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
Hitler was a "Socialist" only in the sense that he wanted certain strategic industries either nationalized or strictly regulated.
Oh and using big infrastructure works to make jobs.
Click to expand...
Squeaky, It's good that you've clarified that you identify as socialist to a question not even posed to you, but you have yet to explain how you are a different socialist than a nazi.
Why would you want to identify with the political party guilty of the largest acts of mass murder in history (hint: nazi's aren't even counted in this tally)?

Crustin, the question still stands for you though.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
LOL from the same post where it defends the daily stormer, it cites others as if they somehow validate his defense of the neo-Nazi propaganda outlet:

Glenn Greenwald Retweeted Max Blumenthal
Not only is it disgusting how they smear these sites w/no evidence; worse is that they do it while hiding their identity. Great job, WPost:

"smear these sites (daily stormer) w/no evidence"

Too funny this. Too bad I can't understand its posts, it sounds like a really funny character.
 
Last edited:
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
LOL from the same post where it defends the daily stormer, it cites others as if they somehow validate his defense of the neo-Nazi propaganda outlet:

Glenn Greenwald Retweeted Max Blumenthal
Not only is it disgusting how they smear these sites w/no evidence; worse is that they do it while hiding their identity. Great job, WPost:

"smear these sites (daily stormer) w/no evidence"

Too funny this. Too bad I can't understand its posts, it sounds like a really funny character.
Click to expand...
I get this weird feeling it's a Skyturd sock...
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
I get this weird feeling it's a Skyturd sock...
Click to expand...
SneekyNinja said:
She was rumored to have a right wing sock and they never ever write posts to each other or are online at the same time.
Click to expand...
Think what you like Squeaky. Like most members of the BCC you will anyway. Since SkrawgDog is sniffing your butt, please explain thi text as he has some sort of dyslexia

I'm just surprised you think it makes any difference to me what you think.

As to growing, remember those "grow chambers" you couldn't fathom the use of?
They serve me quite nicely. ;)
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Think what you like Squeaky. Like most members of the BCC you will anyway. Since SkrawgDog is sniffing your butt, please explain thi text as he has some sort of dyslexia

I'm just surprised you think it makes any difference to me what you think.

As to growing, remember those "grow chambers" you couldn't fathom the use of?
They serve me quite nicely. ;)
Click to expand...
From what I could understand of that, I think you have me mixed up with someone else.

I grow Himalayan Tomatoes hydroponically, I don't know anything about cannabis.
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
LOL from the same post where it defends the daily stormer, it cites others as if they somehow validate his defense of the neo-Nazi propaganda outlet:
Glenn Greenwald Retweeted Max Blumenthal
Not only is it disgusting how they smear these sites w/no evidence; worse is that they do it while hiding their identity. Great job, WPost:
"smear these sites (daily stormer) w/no evidence"
Too funny this. Too bad I can't understand its posts, it sounds like a really funny character.
Click to expand...
Congratualtions!

You got Glenn Greenwald defending 200 sites of which there were a few that were questionable.
Does the quote function still confuse you since you can't seem to use it?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
Congratualtions!

You got Glenn Greenwald defending 200 sites of which there were a few that were questionable.
Does the quote function still confuse you since you can't seem to use it?
Click to expand...
why did you personally defend the neo-nazis at the daily stormer even as they told their heaviy armed readers to intimidate the jewish families they doxxed in person?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top