The Democratic Party Autopsy Report

[Rob Roy]

You would not force a racist white man to serve a black person. You would encourage the racist white man to eject the black person from the premises. You advocate for there being no laws to protect a black person's right to be served by a racist white person. You, therefore, endorse racial discrimination.

You cannot refute this. Embarrassing and weak.

I would not force people to do anything as long as they agreed to leave others alone who wished to be left alone.

I wouldn't force people to associate or not to associate, that's up to the people involved to decide on a mutual basis.

Where do you get the right to determine what other people do if they are leaving you alone? I don't have this right so I can't delegate it to anyone if I never had it.

I see you gave up trying to make actual, albeit embarrassing and weak, arguments and have gone full derp.

I advocate for self determination for everyone, regardless of race. You haven't refuted this.

 

[ChefKimbo]

You would not force a racist white man to serve a black person. You would encourage the racist white man to eject the black person from the premises. You advocate for there being no laws to protect a black person's right to be served by a racist white person. You, therefore, endorse racial discrimination.

You cannot refute this. Embarrassing and weak.

That is bullshit twisted fuzzy logic at best, and can be refuted by my 5 year old.

No blacks wants to be served by racist whites or any declared racists. Any self respecting person in general would not accept any form of service from a perceived enemy.

That's the dumbest shit you've said so far.

 

[SunnyJim]

You cannot refute this. Embarrassing and weak.

I see you gave up trying to make actual, albeit embarrassing and weak, arguments and have gone full derp.

"I know you are, but what am I?" Elementary school stuff here, Rob Roy.

That is bullshit twisted fuzzy logic at best, and can be refuted by my 5 year old.

No blacks wants to be served by racist whites or any declared racists. Any self respecting person in general would not accept any form of service from a perceived enemy.

That's the dumbest shit you've said so far.

You are not very bright, so try to keep up. I have never stated black people have a particular desire to be served by openly racist white people. Straw man. If a black person requires a legitimate service, they have the right to be served, even by a racist white person.

 

[ChefKimbo]

I have never stated black people have a particular desire to be served by openly racist white people. Straw man. If a black person requires a legitimate service, they have the right to be served, even by a racist white person.

Are you on some sort of medication? Whatever it is you really should back off.

Can you even discern that you are implying that if black people want "legitimate service" (whatever that is suppose to mean), then racist whites with "legitimate services" should be forced to serve blacks against their will?
Answer this question, why would blacks need services from openly racist people at all?

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Are you on some sort of medication? Whatever it is you really should back off.

Can you even discern that you are implying that if black people want "legitimate service" (whatever that is suppose to mean), then racist whites with "legitimate services" should be forced to serve blacks against their will?
Answer this question, why would blacks need services from openly racist people at all?

Black people use the police too.

 

[SunnyJim]

Are you on some sort of medication? Whatever it is you really should back off.

Can you even discern that you are implying that if black people want "legitimate service" (whatever that is suppose to mean), then racist whites with "legitimate services" should be forced to serve blacks against their will?
Answer this question, why would blacks need services from openly racist people at all?

Stunning levels of ignorance on display here from what I can decipher.

Explicitly, racist white business owners/employees offering a paid service should be (and thankfully are) 'forced against their will' to serve black people.

Black people might require the 'legitimate' service of buying fuel at the only local gas station, which also might be wholly owned by a racist white person. Their 'need' (or budget) for local fuel might supersede their 'desire' to be served by an admitted racist.

Alarmingly, it would appear as though Rob Roy isn't the most dense and uncivilized contributor on RIU. It's pretty close, though.

 

[ChefKimbo]

Black people use the police too.

No...no they don't.

 

[ChefKimbo]

Stunning levels of ignorance on display here from what I can decipher.

Explicitly, racist white business owners/employees offering a paid service should be (and thankfully are) 'forced against their will' to serve black people.

Black people might require the 'legitimate' service of buying fuel at the only local gas station, which also might be wholly owned by a racist white person. Their 'need' (or budget) for local fuel might supersede their 'desire' to be served by an admitted racist.

Alarmingly, it would appear as though Rob Roy isn't the most dense and uncivilized contributor on RIU. It's pretty close, though.

Obviously you have reservations about black communities having the resources to support themselves.
Your hypothetical scenario implies that blacks have are forced to do business with white racist gas station owners because of some lack of aptitude for providing community services. Your opinion of other races is as uncivilized as it gets. You cannot prove that blacks patronize white businesses out of necessity. However, I CAN PROVE that blacks would rather patronize businesses in their own communities instead of lining the pockets of rich white racist business owners.

FYI Whites are not the only people allowed to own gas stations. Primitive.

 

[SunnyJim]

Obviously you have reservations about black communities having the resources to support themselves.
Your hypothetical scenario implies that blacks have are forced to do business with white racist gas station owners because of some lack of aptitude for providing community services. Your opinion of other races is as uncivilized as it gets. You cannot prove that blacks patronize white businesses out of necessity. However, I CAN PROVE that blacks would rather patronize businesses in their own communities instead of lining the pockets of rich white racist business owners.

FYI Whites are not the only people allowed to own gas stations. Primitive.

You are extremely dense. Please provide a quote of me saying only white people can (or do) own gas stations, or one of me saying black people lack the aptitude to provide community services. Your straw men are weak, and you do not possess the required fortitude for intellectual debate.

Read a book, educate yourself, gain some qualifications. It's never too late, and you might subsequently shed some of your blatant inferiority complexes surrounding your underdeveloped cognitive abilities. I suspect you won't try to educate yourself because you're a proud simpleton. Pitiful.

 

[londonfog]

If a black person has a business on his own property and doesn't want to be forced to serve white people, you're going to force him to though, right?

What you have described is equal oppression, if people were really equal one party could not force another party to serve them, it would have to be mutually agreeable or not happen at all. Race has nothing to do with it. Self determination for everyone ensures equality.

Could you refute this, using your best on point argument or are you too busy complying with edicts which insist a black person must serve a white person against his will?

If you own a business that is open to the public you will serve all regardless of color. If you do not want to serve all make your business private. Charge a small membership and your racist problem is solved. Give up Robbie you're going in circle and seemingly biting your own tail.
I guess you have wonderful writing skills, but you fall short on common sense and understanding simple concepts. How old were you when you achieved the goal of tying your own shoe ? I'm guessing late teens.

 

[see4]

You are 100 miles north of retarded.

 

[londonfog]

That is bullshit twisted fuzzy logic at best, and can be refuted by my 5 year old.

No blacks wants to be served by racist whites or any declared racists. Any self respecting person in general would not accept any form of service from a perceived enemy.

That's the dumbest shit you've said so far.

I'm black/brown and what you are saying is total bullshit. If a business is open to the public I be damn if anyone will keep me from being served. I gave you a moment to see if you are as ignorant as you are coming across. The verdict is in and you are wayyyyyyyy past ignorant

 

[dagwood45431]

Damn you dudes are literally wallowing in the mud naked together. I'm almost too embarrassed to read this shit, somebody close the curtains.

Nobody likes you. Go ahead and close the curtains. Thanks.

 

[PCXV]

There is no way under rob roy moore's ideology to stop nuclear plants from dumping in water people drink or to ensure racial minorities have access to essential services. And he thinks his ideology is the more peaceful one.

 

[srh88]

No...no they don't.

What the fuck? Racist

 

[Rob Roy]

Stunning levels of ignorance on display here from what I can decipher.

Explicitly, racist white business owners/employees offering a paid service should be (and thankfully are) 'forced against their will' to serve black people.

Black people might require the 'legitimate' service of buying fuel at the only local gas station, which also might be wholly owned by a racist white person. Their 'need' (or budget) for local fuel might supersede their 'desire' to be served by an admitted racist.

Alarmingly, it would appear as though Rob Roy isn't the most dense and uncivilized contributor on RIU. It's pretty close, though.

You are trying to turn the issue into a racial one, when at the core it is about property rights and self determination rights.

A racist, whether they are white, black or Asian, etc. has the right to determine the use of his own property and his body, but not that of others.

If that isn't true, it is self evident that you do not believe in "equal rights" since you would then believe that some people have a right to force others into human relationships which take away their right of self determination and body and property sovereignty. Your argument is a prohibitionist argument.

A persons need does not grant them the right to force people into doing things, if the person about to be forced is leaving the needy person alone the needy person becomes an initiator of aggression if they persist.

I'm not surprised that nobody has really answered if they would force a black person to serve a white person. It's quite revealing.

 

[Rob Roy]

There is no way under rob roy moore's ideology to stop nuclear plants from dumping in water people drink or to ensure racial minorities have access to essential services. And he thinks his ideology is the more peaceful one.

One step at a time Grass Hopper. (Your assumption is erroneous, but we can get to it later)

Besides why aren't you out slaving away funding wars you don't agree with but you are forced to pay for?

 

[srh88]

You are trying to turn the issue into a racial one, when at the core it is about property rights and self determination rights.

A racist, whether they are white, black or Asian, etc. has the right to determine the use of his own property and his body, but not that of others.

If that isn't true, it is self evident that you do not believe in "equal rights" since you would then believe that some people have a right to force others into human relationships which take away their right of self determination and body and property sovereignty. Your argument is a prohibitionist argument.

A persons need does not grant them the right to force people into doing things, if the person about to be forced is leaving the needy person alone the needy person becomes an initiator of aggression if they persist.

I'm not surprised that nobody has really answered if they would force a black person to serve a white person. It's quite revealing.

If it's a business open to the public. Yeah I'd force it. Just like I'd force a white man to serve a black man. Your argument is retarded. It's not private property if there's an open sign in the window.

Don't even bother replying. Itl l either be a shitty meme or a leading question. Also youre a pedophile. That's the only reason someone would disagree with age of consent laws

 

[Rob Roy]

If you own a business that is open to the public you will serve all regardless of color. If you do not want to serve all make your business private. Charge a small membership and your racist problem is solved. Give up Robbie you're going in circle and seemingly biting your own tail.
I guess you have wonderful writing skills, but you fall short on common sense and understanding simple concepts. How old were you when you achieved the goal of tying your own shoe ? I'm guessing late teens.

All owned property is ALREADY private or it isn't owned. Public property is an oxymoron.

I don't have a racist problem, but I don't care for racists.

I have a problem with people who rationalize the initiation of force against people to either prevent those who wish to associate from doing so, or to force those who prefer not to associate, to forcibly associate.

Speaking of simple concepts, have you figured out if you'd force a black guy to serve a white guy against the black guys wishes and on the black guys property yet?

 

[Rob Roy]

If it's a business open to the public. Yeah I'd force it. Just like I'd force a white man to serve a black man. Your argument is retarded. It's not private property if there's an open sign in the window.

Don't even bother replying. Itl l either be a shitty meme or a leading question. Also youre a pedophile. That's the only reason someone would disagree with age of consent laws

If the property owner is a racist and doesn't want to serve people from a different race, it isn't "open to the public" then is it numb nuts?

So if age of consent laws vary from place to place, moron, does that mean when a person who has the wherewithal to consent crosses an imaginary border, they magically lose the ability to consent? Don't bother answering, because I have a difficult time comprehending dullard.