This is what happens when politics go one sided

[UncleBuck]

I put him on ignore because he's either a super troll or so hateful and racist that he's a lost course, feelings and twisting over facts for that man. However it is certain from your posts that he is getting his ass kicked very hard ;p.

"He is so hateful and racist" says the guy who had to admit his cause attracts nazis

 

[UncleBuck]

Well, actually that was motivated by thinking no person has a right to force another one to associate with them. Since everyone has that right, the right of self determination, it would be a pro "equal rights" position.

Sounds familiar though...have we talked about that before?

Hanging racial segregation signs is not the equal rights position

 

[zeddd]

That may not be directly true for American left/right parties but it is certainly the general conscientious.

Learn the language, you mean consensus

 

[zeddd]

Tommy Robinson
Vile racist nobody, like flowkill

 

[Rob Roy]

Hanging racial segregation signs is not the equal rights position

Except you abuse the term "rights" and call an instance when one person forces an interaction with another unwilling person on their own property a "right".

Which would be like saying a pack of large feral dogs has a right to interact with your bound, gagged and lubed body in your basement because you have an obligation to serve them and have no right to decide on your own interactions if other parties deem they want to interact with you on your property.

What would be the most polite way you could think of to let the feral dogs know you preferred not to interact with them? Would you hang a sign (assuming dogs could read) or assume the position, spreading gravy train sauce on your hind quarters per their canine instructions and serve them against your will ? On second thought, WOULD it be against your will?

 

[PCXV]

"Forced to serve" lol. As if these businesses aren't making money, you know, the sole purpose of a business. Please save them from all of the money!

 

[Rob Roy]

no one has the right to deny service to others because of their skin color because that causes harm, and no one has the right to harm others you gigantic sack of racist shit.

The reasons a person chooses to not associate with somebody are up to THEM though, not the person(s) attempting to force the association.

If your policy were accurate, no black woman could refuse a date with a white man, because she wasn't attracted to white men who were attracted to her.

So, why would you force a black woman to have an unwanted relationship with a white man? Did your ancestors have slaves they raped and teach you it was okay to force black women they couldn't refuse to serve a white man?

 

[Rob Roy]

"Forced to serve" lol. As if these businesses aren't making money, you know, the sole purpose of a business. Please save them from all of the money!

Well when you're done snickering, could you explain what the term "law enforcement" means and if you agree that black women should be forced to serve white men they'd prefer not to?

I would never force a black woman (or anyone else) to serve a money bearing white man against her will, would you?

 

[Rob Roy]

If they were hired to do a job, it's not force, dumb fuck.
Please stop spamming the forum with white nationalist talking points.

So, if I hired somebody to obtain payment from you for a thing that I like but that you didn't and even if you agreed to leave people alone and not use the thing I like, you would somehow STILL be obligated to pay ?

If you didn't pay and men used guns to force you to, that's not an instance of "gun violence" ? Why not ? What makes your claim so and mine in error? Please elaborate, you silly nincompoop.

 

[Justin-case]

So, if I hired somebody to obtain payment from you for a thing that I like but that you didn't and even if you agreed to leave people alone and not use the thing I like, you would somehow STILL be obligated to pay ?

If you didn't pay and men used guns to force you to, that's not an instance of "gun violence" ? Why not ? What makes your claim so and mine in error? Please elaborate, you silly nincompoop.

You don't hire hire people, and never will.
I will also remind you of what happened to the other racists that have spammed the forum in the past.

 

[UncleBuck]

The reasons a person chooses to not associate with somebody are up to THEM though, not the person(s) attempting to force the association.

If your policy were accurate, no black woman could refuse a date with a white man, because she wasn't attracted to white men who were attracted to her.

So, why would you force a black woman to have an unwanted relationship with a white man? Did your ancestors have slaves they raped and teach you it was okay to force black women they couldn't refuse to serve a white man?

Please do not spam the forum with your shitty, stupid white nationalist talking points

 

[PCXV]

Well when you're done snickering, could you explain what the term "law enforcement" means and if you agree that black women should be forced to serve white men they'd prefer not to?

I would never force a black woman (or anyone else) to serve a money bearing white man against her will, would you?

She has no reason or right to not serve a person based only on their skin color. There are legitimate reasons to deny service, that isn't one of them.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

Rob Roy leads a class of himself in remedial Civics 090.

 

[Rob Roy]

She has no reason or right to not serve a person based only on their skin color. There are legitimate reasons to deny service, that isn't one of them.

According to you, she has no reason. According to HER, does she have a reason to decline and isn't that reason a line which she should decide where it exists ? Something to ponder.

You be sure and have a nice day and try hard not to manage others live for them.

 

[Rob Roy]

You don't hire hire people, and never will.
I will also remind you of what happened to the other racists that have spammed the forum in the past.

Yes, because my wanting a black woman (and every other person too) to be able to decide how she will use her body and property makes me a racist? Logic is not your strong suit.

Rob Roy leads a class of himself in remedial Civics 090.

 

[Rob Roy]

Please do not spam the forum with your shitty, stupid white nationalist talking points

I'm not a white nationalist or a nationalist of any kind. If you are unable to refute things I say, I can understand why you'd prefer to create a smoke screen to malign me with though, since it is easier than addressing your own inconsistencies.

I'll leave you to enjoy the sound of your echo chamber.

 

[Unclebaldrick]

I'll leave you to enjoy the sound of your echo chamber.

Please do.

 

[Justin-case]

Yes, because my wanting a black woman (and every other person too) to be able to decide how she will use her body and property makes me a racist? Logic is not your strong suit.

Nobody likes you.
Please stop spamming the forum with white nationalist propaganda.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm not a white nationalist

then why are you spamming the forum with white nationalist talking points about how civil rights are rape and slavery?

 

[Rob Roy]

then why are you spamming the forum with white nationalist talking points about how civil rights are rape and slavery?

That's a flawed assumption, (as usual) but a reasonable approach in the manner of your question. I appreciate that.

So, let's expose your erroneous assumption and contradictory philosophy, Poopy Pants. You sanctify taking away one persons right, and somehow (in your opinion) simultaneously protect another parties nonexistent right to forcibly engage another person.

I don't think people interacting or not interacting on a basis they decide is any of my business. In fact I know it isn't. It's none of your business either if it doesn't involve you. I accept that as virtually axiomatic, you ought to.

So, when you pretend you and other people DO have a right to force person A to interact with person B, you are violating the equal right of person A to decline a human relationship. People who forcibly don't take NO for an answer when another person doesn't want to interact with them include rapists, slave masters, governments of all kinds and YOU.

I'm not spamming anything white nationalist, for one thing, I was born on a small Pacific island and I'm not much for "nations" or nationalists held together by political magic and imaginary boundaries. It's my hope people come to realize that forced relations as a personal and systemic means can never eliminate the things people hope to eliminate, it is logically impossible. Plus, you shouldn't shit on other people's floors...ever. Bad karma.