Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
So you're saying he's more harmful?
The "D" day pool, best guess as to when Trump is out
- Thread starter DIY-HP-LED
- Start date
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
ok, i guess i have my "opiate"....let the masses have theirs....the dumbass, ignorant....nm....let the masses have theirs
topcat
Well-Known Member
I knew what he was saying.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/20/investing/why-dow-dropped/index.html
Tell me more about how trump is good for the economy.......
seriously....where are all the guys who keep saying it's ok to be a traitorous, misogynist, racist, lying piece of shit, as long as the economy is in great shape?.....
Tell me more about how trump is good for the economy.......
seriously....where are all the guys who keep saying it's ok to be a traitorous, misogynist, racist, lying piece of shit, as long as the economy is in great shape?.....
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Who knows what I said? Somebody deleted my post. Not that I care but I didn't use any naughty words or dox anybody so fuck you whoever did that.
I think that if he were more harmless then he'd be more harmful than somebody who is much more harmless.
Or something like that.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
I don't want you to break the constitution, Trump already did that, just for the congress to enforce it and do their duty, just like a majority of Americans want. The senate is not impervious to public pressure and Mitch McConnell might be having trouble holding things together.
Guess we will just have to see what Mueller and the lifers in the DOJ have and we might not hear much until the congress changes next year. I think they might whack Trump and a bunch of others all at once, cause Trump will panic fire dozens in the DOJ and they might only get one chance. I wonder if Matt Whitaker has a preassigned pardon in his pocket? Dunno if it would stand up with the SCOTUS though.
The point of the post is that Donald is getting more erratic as the heat gets turned up, his psychopathology predicts his behavior, so does the maxim, the best predictor of future behavior is past performance. Donald has never remotely experienced the kind of stress he's gonna endure over the coming months and he does not deal with stress, or reality for that matter, very well.
Yer best option is he strokes out cheeseburger in one hand and an iphone in the other, found dead in bed mid tweet...
Last edited:
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Here is the latest example of Trump breaking the US constitution.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trump raised investigating Clinton with Rosenstein, Whitaker and McGahn
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/20/politics/donald-trump-don-mcgahn-clinton-comey/index.html
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump on multiple occasions raised with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Matt Whitaker, who was then-chief of staff to Jeff Sessions, whether the Justice Department was progressing in investigating Hillary Clinton, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The President also wanted his previous White House counsel, Don McGahn, to ask the Justice Department to prosecute Clinton on numerous occasions, but McGahn rebuffed doing that, the source said.
Anticipating the question about Clinton would be raised, Whitaker came prepared to answer with what Justice was doing on Clinton-related matters, including the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One investigations, the source said. The source added that Whitaker was trying to appease the President, but did not seem to cross any line.
The New York Times first reported on Trump's requests to McGahn to prosecute Clinton, as well as former FBI Director James Comey.
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to CNN's requests for comment.
In March, then-Attorney General Sessions revealed that Utah's top federal prosecutor, John Huber, was looking into allegations that the FBI abused its powers in surveilling a former Trump campaign adviser, and claims that more should have been done to investigate Clinton's ties to a Russian nuclear energy agency, which have not been proven.
And in January, CNN reported that the US attorney and FBI in Arkansas were investigating allegations of corruption related to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI and federal prosecutors are looking into whether donors to the foundation were improperly promised policy favors or special access to Clinton while she was secretary of state in exchange for donations to the charity's coffers, as well as whether tax-exempt funds were misused, the official said. A spokesman for Clinton dismissed the allegations as unfounded.
William Burck, a lawyer for McGahn, issued a statement following the Times report that said the President hadn't ordered prosecutions of Clinton or Comey.
"Mr. McGahn will not comment on his legal advice to the president. Like any client, the president is entitled to confidentiality. Mr. McGahn would point out, though, that the president never, to his knowledge, ordered that anyone prosecute Hillary Clinton or James Comey," Burck said.
The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's requests for comment.
This is a breaking story and will be updated.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trump raised investigating Clinton with Rosenstein, Whitaker and McGahn
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/20/politics/donald-trump-don-mcgahn-clinton-comey/index.html
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump on multiple occasions raised with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Matt Whitaker, who was then-chief of staff to Jeff Sessions, whether the Justice Department was progressing in investigating Hillary Clinton, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The President also wanted his previous White House counsel, Don McGahn, to ask the Justice Department to prosecute Clinton on numerous occasions, but McGahn rebuffed doing that, the source said.
Anticipating the question about Clinton would be raised, Whitaker came prepared to answer with what Justice was doing on Clinton-related matters, including the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One investigations, the source said. The source added that Whitaker was trying to appease the President, but did not seem to cross any line.
The New York Times first reported on Trump's requests to McGahn to prosecute Clinton, as well as former FBI Director James Comey.
The Justice Department did not immediately respond to CNN's requests for comment.
In March, then-Attorney General Sessions revealed that Utah's top federal prosecutor, John Huber, was looking into allegations that the FBI abused its powers in surveilling a former Trump campaign adviser, and claims that more should have been done to investigate Clinton's ties to a Russian nuclear energy agency, which have not been proven.
And in January, CNN reported that the US attorney and FBI in Arkansas were investigating allegations of corruption related to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI and federal prosecutors are looking into whether donors to the foundation were improperly promised policy favors or special access to Clinton while she was secretary of state in exchange for donations to the charity's coffers, as well as whether tax-exempt funds were misused, the official said. A spokesman for Clinton dismissed the allegations as unfounded.
William Burck, a lawyer for McGahn, issued a statement following the Times report that said the President hadn't ordered prosecutions of Clinton or Comey.
"Mr. McGahn will not comment on his legal advice to the president. Like any client, the president is entitled to confidentiality. Mr. McGahn would point out, though, that the president never, to his knowledge, ordered that anyone prosecute Hillary Clinton or James Comey," Burck said.
The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's requests for comment.
This is a breaking story and will be updated.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Nope, our constitution is just fine. We aren't going to tear it up for Canada or right wingers or people on the left.
Until 30 Republican Senators say they are ready to remove Trump from office, there is no good reason to pursue impeachment.
Trump's going to finish his two remaining years and then we'll deal with the carnage he'll leave behind.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
the platform i'm looking for someone to run on, is "Erase the tRump legacy".....undo everything he's done, de-privatize nasa, re-fund pbs and the national parks, fire every incompetent fuck he put into an ambassador position, tell the nra to get fucked, tell hate groups to shut the fuck up, work with the rest of the government to straighten out immigration...fuck, just work WITH the rest of the government, not against it....
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
Your post wasn't deleted
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Like I said, Trump broke the constitution, though I can see amending it one day as required by the passing of time and changes in society. The current constitution depends on the personal character and integrity of the POTUS who controls a third of the government, but the current occupant of the office lacks these basic human qualities. Your constitution is not fine, but a deeply flawed document and Trump has exposed it as such, the constitution was a creation of men, not God. The current problem with America involves more than the constitution, but the will of those who enforce it and the hatred that has almost half the nation driven mad and Hell bent on self destruction.
If Trump lasts 2 more years it will be because the constitution is broken, it's just a piece of paper without those who keep the oath they swore to it. There is more to a constitution than paper and words, there are oaths and the integrity (or lack of) of those who have sworn to protect and defend it from the likes of Trump.
If there is cause then the house should impeach Trump and present the case to the senate before the next election, the senators will be on the record and then the American people can judge them and the evidence for themselves. Senators cannot say what they will do until presented with the evidence at the trial. You'll need 67 senators to convict Trump, about a dozen republicans...
blu3bird
Well-Known Member
Shut up, clown
blu3bird
Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
Canada is a good friend and trading partner.....but i don't think many Canadians have fuck all to tell us about politics
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/02/07/peoplekind-is-the-least-of-justin-trudeaus-problems/?utm_term=.72fc7633c9a6
https://www.mtlblog.com/whats-happening/10-things-justin-trudeau-has-done-horribly-wrong-as-canadas-prime-minister
https://theconversation.com/why-justin-trudeau-is-not-the-leader-many-believe-he-is-90796
soooo, maybe just check the attitude, maple syrup
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/02/07/peoplekind-is-the-least-of-justin-trudeaus-problems/?utm_term=.72fc7633c9a6
https://www.mtlblog.com/whats-happening/10-things-justin-trudeau-has-done-horribly-wrong-as-canadas-prime-minister
https://theconversation.com/why-justin-trudeau-is-not-the-leader-many-believe-he-is-90796
soooo, maybe just check the attitude, maple syrup
Counterchekist@counterchekistWe’re winning, patriots. ... And wayyy more than you realize right now...
5:26 AM - 21 Nov 2018
dang is his maple leaf hot..
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
The current constitution depends on the personal character and integrity of the POTUS who controls a third of the government, but the current occupant of the office lacks these basic human qualities. The current problem with America involves more than the constitution, but the will of those who enforce it and the hatred that has almost half the nation driven mad and Hell bent on self destruction.
Who wants to respond to the above, not react. I didn't kick Uncle Sam in the nuts here, but I'm raising reasonable concerns that I'm pretty sure will be addressed one day.
The US constitution is good enough for now, it has to be, but face it, a simple minded asshole like Donald Trump has damn near broken you as a country and he damn well broke the constitution. The main problem now is with the congress, specifically the senate, not the constitution, though he is exploiting "holes" in it too.
Who wants to respond to the above, not react. I didn't kick Uncle Sam in the nuts here, but I'm raising reasonable concerns that I'm pretty sure will be addressed one day.
The US constitution is good enough for now, it has to be, but face it, a simple minded asshole like Donald Trump has damn near broken you as a country and he damn well broke the constitution. The main problem now is with the congress, specifically the senate, not the constitution, though he is exploiting "holes" in it too.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Yeah, who do they think they are, Russians?
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
a simple minded asshole like donald trump was in the right place at the right time, with the right backing....letting politics become self controlling is the problem. a lack of checks and balances is the problem.....trump is just a fucking tumor, caused by the underlying cancer....corrupt government with no one to stop it
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Trudeau is normal and I don't always agree with him, these are the kind of stories you'd see about your own government in normal times with normal people at the helm.
Your political system is about to make a major adjustment and the shit is really about to hit the fan, the constitution and more importantly the people who enforce it are about to be tested.
Last edited: