UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that guy's never heard of the female orgasm, much less realignment
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
Life
Liberty
Property
Abortion is a violation of the 5th Amendment. To impede on any inalienable right is tyranny.
Liberty
Property
Abortion is a violation of the 5th Amendment. To impede on any inalienable right is tyranny.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Nuh uh
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
The idiot men that are all anti abortion are the same exact assholes that blame single mothers they walked out on for relying on food stamps and other programs to care for their children.
They want women to have to have them while at the same time they get to sit on their ass, have nothing to do with them and blame them for all the nations problems.
They want women to have to have them while at the same time they get to sit on their ass, have nothing to do with them and blame them for all the nations problems.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Until they knock one up.
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Well what ever the reason they (men) feel they have the right to mandate what a women chooses to do, it’s wrong. Women have had to fight and win a long battle for the right to choose and it would be a step back to the Middle Ages and back alley abortions to take that away. If you read between the lines of his commentary, it sounds to me like he’s more concerned about punishing/controlling women by making them carry to term. Not worrying about the outcome of the child at all.
NaturalFarmer
Well-Known Member
Slave owners had the same argument against freeing slaves.
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Source?
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Hannity.
NaturalFarmer
Well-Known Member
How many of the aborted babies are women? It is a stupid argument. We have contraceptives that are almost guaranteed to prevent conception in 2019.
NaturalFarmer
Well-Known Member
There are tons of examples. do some research for two minutes
http://www.ushistory.org/us/27f.asp
"Defenders of slavery argued that by comparison with the poor of Europe and the workers in the Northern states, that slaves were better cared for. They said that their owners would protect and assist them when they were sick and aged, unlike those who, once fired from their work, were left to fend helplessly for themselves."
http://www.ushistory.org/us/27f.asp
"Defenders of slavery argued that by comparison with the poor of Europe and the workers in the Northern states, that slaves were better cared for. They said that their owners would protect and assist them when they were sick and aged, unlike those who, once fired from their work, were left to fend helplessly for themselves."
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Almost.
NaturalFarmer
Well-Known Member
Lets start a thread on realignment so I can blow it out of the water. When did blacks begin voting for Democrats again? "Turn Lincolns picture towards the wall" Hint.....It wasn't the 1960's
medviper
Well-Known Member
That would be during Roosevelt's "new deal", Truman's desegregation of the various branches of the armed forces, and Lyndon Baines passages into law of the "great society/civil rights" laws ... so whats to blow out of the water?...
NaturalFarmer
Well-Known Member
Start a thread and Ill blow your theory up once I get done my work.
Couch_Lock
Well-Known Member
Republican party died 5 yrs ago. The Freedom Caucas sorta killed it off, way too extremist right. No chances of compromise or a civil discussion.
These days R represents the RUSSIAN agenda....Putin's puppet is installed and Russia, not the USA, benefits. Corporate types, wall streeters too and Russia is happy. Everyone else suffers and watches daily abuses of power.
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
FIFY.
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
And they used Christianity, rule of ownership, pseudo science, and the economics. What’s your point?