The corollary to your idea is you insist that person A somehow has a right to force person B to serve them. Absent a bilateral and mutually consenting agreement between them, that right doesn't exist.
If you could refute that, you and the gang of jackals already would have. Except, you can't, so you change the subject and make an emotional appeal argument without defeating the substance of my argument.
In plain English, you are okay with forms of forced servitude. You believe in order to "protect equality", you must first use a system where the main feature is the denial of equality to do it. That's a nonsensical argument. Then when I point that out, you cry and call me a racist.
My position has nothing to do with favoring a specific race. it has everything to do with favoring individual autonomy and equal right of every person, OF EVERY RACE, to not be forced into human relationships they'd rather not have.