ChiefRunningPhist
Well-Known Member
Don't worry they are coming.Sure, bring a real charge against him, there must be plenty. No need to make up fake Russia stories.
http://fortune.com/2019/03/01/chris-christie-sdny-trump/
Don't worry they are coming.Sure, bring a real charge against him, there must be plenty. No need to make up fake Russia stories.
Lmao she's not president, remember? Smh watch, trumpys will still be blaming Hillary come 2020..Imagine evidence of Hillary's guilt being presented and then the case inexplicably dismissed by the FBI, oh wait...
Jesus, is your penis orange too?Sure, bring a real charge against him, there must be plenty. No need to make up fake Russia stories.
What evidence?Imagine evidence of Hillary's guilt being presented and then the case inexplicably dismissed by the FBI, oh wait...
Why the delusional phantom of course, then there's always those with dissenting opinions, of which by the way will continue to grow in numbers if this keeps upIf Hillary didn't exist who would republicans blame?
isn't yours?Jesus, is your penis orange too?
bill, if bill didn't exist, pick any democratic president back to LBJ...If Hillary didn't exist who would republicans blame?
How about Newt Gingrinch, can't we blame him too?bill, if bill didn't exist, pick any democratic president back to LBJ...
If Hillary Clinton's a Criminal, Donald Trump should have the Death Penalty then.Hillary Clinton is a criminal.
You claim Clinton's case was inexplicably dismissed by the FBI. Two plus years of investigation, more than ten million dollars spent, Clinton herself spent and entire day testifying before Congress, Comey himself went before Congress to explain his reasons, yet you say "inexplicable" meaning it is obvious that she's guilty. Quite clearly your threshold of guilt is very low. Trump quite clearly passed that bar. By your own words and those of your fascist butt buddies that show your standard for guilt, Trump should be buried up to his head in an ant's nest and left to be consumed alive.Sure, bring a real charge against him, there must be plenty. No need to make up fake Russia stories.
The FISA application in question is the Oct. 2016 application on Page. The issue is not with the judges but with the FBI including unvalidated information without disclosing it was unvalidated. A FISA court no no. Suggest you read beyond CNN sources, the Hill has had the best reporting on this.https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/10/politics/william-barr-spying-carter-page/index.html
so all of this "spying" was sanctioned by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court...and the only person who could possibly be liable is the FISA judge who granted the warrant...and i'm sure a judge appointed by the head of the supreme court is much more likely to be a criminal than trump and the clowns who work for him....all 11 members of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court decided in 2013 to allow surveillance on Page, because they knew in 5 years he would go to work for trump....not because the f.b.i. presented them with sufficient cause to not only issue the warrant, but to renew it multiple times....
You must have missed the Comey announcement, it was big news at the time. It all came down to intent, which was not relevant to the statutes violated by Hillary.What evidence?
Oh wait...they didn't find any.
Nah, not going to bother. You are a fucking liar.The FISA application in question is the Oct. 2016 application on Page. The issue is not with the judges but with the FBI including unvalidated information without disclosing it was unvalidated. A FISA court no no. Suggest you read beyond CNN sources, the Hill has had the best reporting on this.
Well then it shouldn't be a problem that Barr is looking into it, should it?After all the lies from this administration and you, I'm just going to consider the source as the best testimony on the subject and say you and everybody else making this claim is lying.
which was not relevant to the statutes violated by Hillary.
Barr said it in his summary report. There are tons of evidence showing Trump's involvement. But not enough to convict, because the legal standard for conviction is very high. I get it.Well then it shouldn't be a problem that Barr is looking into it, should it?
You mean the FISA application that was applied for after Carter Page left the administration and was found to be working for the Russians?The FISA application in question is the Oct. 2016 application on Page. The issue is not with the judges but with the FBI including unvalidated information without disclosing it was unvalidated. A FISA court no no. Suggest you read beyond CNN sources, the Hill has had the best reporting on this.