Dont be ashamed that you watch hannity every night lol. Justin the closet faux supporterFor sure, islut must have mentioned hunter biden's name half a dozen times in the the two minutes I watched.
Dont be ashamed that you watch hannity every night lol. Justin the closet faux supporterFor sure, islut must have mentioned hunter biden's name half a dozen times in the the two minutes I watched.
Who doesn't enjoy a good laugh every now and again?Dont be ashamed that you watch hannity every night lol. Justin the closet faux supporter
I get 98% of my news info from hannity and rush ,but dont tell the bucksterWho doesn't enjoy a good laugh every now and again?
Russian asset is not the same as agent. Nonetheless, the term is loaded and I believe was not fairly applied to Jill Stein although Clinton was not wrong when she said it. It is a fact that Gabbard is constantly being mentioned in Russian troll streams. From what I've read, Clinton didn't call Gabbard a Russian asset. Though she came right up to doing so:I'm not a Tulsi fan, but I don't think she is a Russian agent. Hillary is still bitter at Stine and Sanders for costing her the election and Tulsi supported Bernie. This is clearly obvious to anybody who is not a complete partisan.
I'd like to point out to you that you've been unfortunately deceived by Louise Mensch. It seems that in that screenshot he posted, he didn't include the entire screen, in an effort to cause misinformation.Russia helped Tulsi put this little ad together but they don't have any influence on her lol.
View attachment 4412954View attachment 4412955
Again you've been deceived.Tulsi Gabbard Goes On Fox News Before Announcing She Won't Run For Congress Again
The Hawaii congresswoman criticized the House's impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump as "very partisan."www.huffpost.com
It doesn't matter she is burnt, now the trolling can just turn to the horrible propaganda campaign against Tulsi to cast shade on Trump's very real holding up of congressionally mandated military funding to another country to strong arm them into manufacturing dirt on Biden because they have no answer for him.Tulsi Gabbard Goes On Fox News Before Announcing She Won't Run For Congress Again
The Hawaii congresswoman criticized the House's impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump as "very partisan."www.huffpost.com
Is that belief you have the reason you post misinformation? I noticed you didn't have anything to say about my correction to your "info".Tulsi is a wack job cultist with her cult leader running her campaign.
So you don't deny that she's in a cult?Is that belief you have the reason you post misinformation? I noticed you didn't have anything to say about my correction to your "info".
Did russian state media write 20 fawning articles about any other democratic candidate?Is that belief you have the reason you post misinformation? I noticed you didn't have anything to say about my correction to your "info".
Let me understand you better. Are you saying that you agree with Gabbard that the House is wrong to investigate Trump under impeachment proceedings due to evidence that he pressured the Ukrainian government to help his election campaign in exchange for US funds to aid Ukraine in their defense from Russian aggression?Again you've been deceived.
The headlines state: The Hawaii congresswoman criticized the House’s impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump as “very partisan.”
However if you read the article, the actual quote is: “I’ve long expressed my concern about going through impeachment proceedings in a very, very partisan way because it will only further tear apart an already divided country,” she said."
Fake news? not.Is that belief you have the reason you post misinformation? I noticed you didn't have anything to say about my correction to your "info".
I'm talking about a specific post that contained incorrect misinformation. Did you not see what they did just a couple of posts prior?Fake news? not.
there is quite a bit of history and evidence that Tulsi Gabbard is still under the influence of a wacky religious, racist, homophobic and backward cult.
You are reading too far into my post. I am saying one thing only: I want the headlines to reflect fact. I want specific quotes, not some paraphrasing.Let me understand you better. Are you saying that you agree with Gabbard that the House is wrong to investigate Trump under impeachment proceedings due to evidence that he pressured the Ukrainian government to help his election campaign in exchange for US funds to aid Ukraine in their defense from Russian aggression?
I don't know. She's not high enough on my boner list to know all that much about her. I'm just looking for facts here. If you have facts that's great. Disinformation, not so great. Which cult is it?So you don't deny that she's in a cult?
Did russian state media write 20 fawning articles about any other democratic candidateYou are reading too far into my post. I am saying one thing only: I want the headlines to reflect fact. I want specific quotes, not some paraphrasing.
I likely will not vote for Tulsi, she's not at the top of my list, so know that. That said however, I have been following some of the recent disinformation associated with her. I have another example, where one article incorrectly paraphrased from another article, which was paraphrased to begin with.
Here's what they posted in a jacobinmag.com article: "..a 2015 interview with Ozy, in which she confirmed that her personal views on gay marriage and abortion hadn’t changed, just her view on whether the government should enforce its vision of morality."
So I decided to check the source. In that 2015 Ozy interview they referenced, the only thing that comes close to validating what they stated above was this:" (She tells me that, no, her personal views haven’t changed, but she doesn’t figure it’s her job to do as the Iraqis did and force her own beliefs on others.) "
Seems to be that the above "quote" from the Ozy interview is not a quote at all, but the author paraphrasing something off record. Also they say nothing about those views relating to gay marriage, but somehow the jacobin author just slipped it right in there.
I'm not here to advocate for one position over another, but I will advocate for news reporting to be factual every time, not based on innuendo and paraphrases.