Possibility of WW3?

Do you believe that ww3 is a real possibility?

  • Not these days, maybe in the future

    Votes: 7 22.6%
  • We are more intelligent than that now, we have learned from the past

    Votes: 1 3.2%
  • ww3 is imminent

    Votes: 7 22.6%
  • No you will never see a world war again

    Votes: 2 6.5%
  • It is inconceivable but still possible

    Votes: 4 12.9%
  • ww3 is bound to happen at some point just can't say when

    Votes: 17 54.8%

  • Total voters
    31

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Pretty sure the Donnor party said fake news after being warned about the Sierra. They would've voted for trump too.
Didn't they meet their end in Colorado Rockies?

There was a "love America, support Trump*" sign in someone's yard in Estes Park.

*impeached
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Democracy would still reign so the socialist aspect of society would be determined by the majority, just as I do not agree with capitalism it is in fact in place and I have no choice but to work for capitalists, but I dont feel my speech is impeded by the majority of society, but in my vision you would no longer work for the super wealthy you would work for your own gain and the gain of society, so I cant understand why someone would disagree with that, but if you do that is none of my business.


So, you're okay imposing by force (that's what democracy usually really is) socialism on 49 people, if 51 out of 100 people say it's okay? Isn't that an involuntary means for the 49 people who don't want to be socialists?

I don't work for the super wealthy. I tend my garden and eat what I produce, trade the surplus. Are you saying if people vote that my surplus be given to them, that I should obey that edict?

I can understand that people would disagree with me, which is why I'm not willing to make them live according to my vision, as long as they reciprocate.
 

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
So, you're okay imposing by force (that's what democracy usually really is) socialism on 49 people, if 51 out of 100 people say it's okay? Isn't that an involuntary means for the 49 people who don't want to be socialists?

I don't work for the super wealthy. I tend my garden and eat what I produce, trade the surplus. Are you saying if people vote that my surplus be given to them, that I should obey that edict?

I can understand that people would disagree with me, which is why I'm not willing to make them live according to my vision, as long as they reciprocate.
First we would vote you off the island, so you wouldn't have to worry about it anyway, pedo.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Mom's class used to read "alive" about the plane crash in the Andes mountains. Didn't take long before they started eating the dead.

Careful, you're likely to get Rob hungry with all this talk about cannibalism.
I'm guessing you're kinda marbled and gristly. Probably feed you to the cat.
 

New Age United

Well-Known Member
So, you're okay imposing by force (that's what democracy usually really is) socialism on 49 people, if 51 out of 100 people say it's okay? Isn't that an involuntary means for the 49 people who don't want to be socialists?

I don't work for the super wealthy. I tend my garden and eat what I produce, trade the surplus. Are you saying if people vote that my surplus be given to them, that I should obey that edict?

I can understand that people would disagree with me, which is why I'm not willing to make them live according to my vision, as long as they reciprocate.
Yes socialism would be superimposed on the 49 just as capitalism is imposed on the 98 today, just bc they have been given some rights and taught what to believe does not mean that Republicans are free they are being manipulated by 45 and Fox news just as the elite have done for decades now, so really their own beliefs are not their own but that which the elite have orchestrated, I firmly believe that 98% of the population would agree with socialism if the choice was given to them from birth.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Yes socialism would be superimposed on the 49 just as capitalism is imposed on the 98 today, just bc they have been given some rights and taught what to believe does not mean that Republicans are free they are being manipulated by 45 and Fox news just as the elite have done for decades now, so really their own beliefs are not their own but that which the elite have orchestrated, I firmly believe that 98% of the population would agree with socialism if the choice was given to them from birth.
So you're saying in order to right one government enabled forcible imposition, it is necessary to impose on others using another kind of government enabled imposition ?

I'm beginning to suspect your "voluntary means" proclamation may have been made in haste. Are you sure you'd use voluntary means ?
 

New Age United

Well-Known Member
Basically what I'm saying @Rob Roy is you can't change the economy until the collective can all agree, the vast majority of persons, if it were only 51% socialists and 49% capitalists it would teeter totter back and forth for decades and that would be extremely stressful, maybe its necessary, maybe it will take WW3 to settle our differences.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Basically what I'm saying @Rob Roy is you can't change the economy until the collective can all agree, the vast majority of persons, if it were only 51% socialists and 49% capitalists it would teeter totter back and forth for decades and that would be extremely stressful, maybe its necessary, maybe it will take WW3 to settle our differences.
When you say "all agree", do you really mean "all" agree ? That's not going to happen. That's by design.

Since it's not going to happen, wouldn't it be better to get individual people to agree to, "you do your thing and I'll do my thing"?
It's not like we even need to get people to "agree" to be able to do their own thing, most people get that part, it's the letting others do their own thing where the problem comes in. Hence Voluntary, solves that problem.

You get to be a socialist, I get to be me, neither of us gets to make the other person do anything, but leave each other alone if that's what we want, or if we want to interact on a mutual basis, we can.

What business is it of 51 people, what 49 others do ?
 

New Age United

Well-Known Member
When you say "all agree", do you really mean "all" agree ? That's not going to happen. That's by design.

Since it's not going to happen, wouldn't it be better to get individual people to agree to, "you do your thing and I'll do my thing"?
It's not like we even need to get people to "agree" to be able to do their own thing, most people get that part, it's the letting others do their own thing where the problem comes in. Hence Voluntary, solves that problem.

You get to be a socialist, I get to be me, neither of us gets to make the other person do anything, but leave each other alone if that's what we want, or if we want to interact on a mutual basis, we can.

What business is it of 51 people, what 49 others do ?
Right which brings me back to my original point, there has to be a shift in consciousness before we can see change, no not everyone will agree but it is not your right to do your own thing if it is causing suffering and death millions of people, the change is absolutely necessary or humanity will once again approach its boundaries and the economies of the world will collapse and there will be mass unemployment, maybe its necessary, maybe the birth pangs that jesus spoke of are these world wars, maybe we are not ready for socialism and history repeats itself.
 
Top