The Second Amendment says otherwise.Just because it shoots bullets doesn't mean everyone should be allowed to own one.
That's why nobody is talking about full auto.
It's just a bad idea...
My stance is that you’re 43 times more likely to kill yourself or family than to defend yourself with thoseView attachment 4509470
What's y'alls stance on guns? I've notice most on here are left leaning to extreme left, which means most of you think of healthcare as a right to be paid or subsidized by the government. Well, arms are an actual Right, so where is my free government provided bazooka?
Since when did you become retardedThe Second Amendment says otherwise.
This is the bone in the care of “communitarians” everywhere.
The Second Amendment is the sole guarantor of the First Amendment, and anyone (y’all know whom I mean) who says otherwise is promulgating a sinister agenda.
Buncha fake pluralists
Link to stats from a nonSocialist?My stance is that you’re 43 times more likely to kill yourself or family than to defend yourself with those
No thanks schuylaarLink to stats from a nonSocialist?
Then your opinion continues to have negative value.No thanks schuylaar
LolThen your opinion continues to have negative value.
Since your fall from grace you have striven to support your tripe by sheer volume.
Even NV so the fact remains that the Second us the only credible guardian of the First.
Which makes me wonder why you oppose free speech.
Compare my credibility with yours, and weep.Lol
you’ve gone full on crackhead ever since you decided to defend racist shitheads
the stat is real, the fall from reason is yours
Really I agree. It is just so hard to get back on target with those. Bad idea for any marksmanship.Just because it shoots bullets doesn't mean everyone should be allowed to own one.
That's why nobody is talking about full auto.
It's just a bad idea...
Your shitty car is way more likely to kill your entire family than all guns combined. Yet driving isn't a Right.My stance is that you’re 43 times more likely to kill yourself or family than to defend yourself with those
I like the way you plink.Then your opinion continues to have negative value.
Since your fall from grace you have striven to support your tripe by sheer volume.
Even NV so the fact remains that the Second us the only credible guardian of the First.
Which makes me wonder why you oppose free speech.
Guns are cheaper than dogs. Why do you feel the poor dont have a Right to self defense of their home and family?Rescue dogs FTW, guns can't think for themselves in the case of a home invasion and don't give any warning either.
View attachment 4509484
The "not abridged" part is all gun nuts want to talk about. "Well regulated" is the part where we could do better.The Second Amendment says otherwise.
This is the bone in the craw of “communitarians” everywhere.
The Second Amendment is the sole guarantor of the First Amendment, and anyone (y’all know whom I mean) who says otherwise is promulgating a sinister agenda.
Buncha fake pluralists
I am not sure that is an endorsement, if you’ll forgive me.I like the way you plink.
The stat is realCompare my credibility with yours, and weep.
If the stat were real you’d provide a link to a non- interested source. You didn’t.
You despise civil gun ownership, just like all the other National Socialists whose lying tactics you embrace.