Guns.

[UncleBuck]

I am not sure that is an endorsement, if you’ll forgive me.

I am just sick and tired of the idiots who maintain (without the support of the numbers, unless they’ve hairdressed them) that the police are adequate to the task.

The argument is that you’re 43 times more likely to kill yourself or your family with a gun

you’re trying to change the subject because you suck at this

 

[cannabineer]

The "not abridged" part is all gun nuts want to talk about. "Well regulated" is the part where we could do better.

“Well-regulated” in 18th-century English means “can hit the target” and has no implication of what we 21st-century types think of in terms of regulation. this is one of the most pernicious etymological canards pushed on us by the enemies of the Second Amendment. Don’t be one such.

 

[hanimmal]

Guns are cheaper than dogs. Why do you feel the poor dont have a Right to self defense of their home and family?

Lots of dogs are looking for good foster homes. Don't have to pay shit.

I would put money on my wife being safer than you/yours in the case of a home invasion.

 

[Fogdog]

Then your opinion continues to have negative value.

Since your fall from grace you have striven to support your tripe by sheer volume.

Even NV so the fact remains that the Second us the only credible guardian of the First.

Which makes me wonder why you oppose free speech.

Ignorance is curable,

you can start with a simple google search if you like.

 

[tangerinegreen555]

View attachment 4509470

What's y'alls stance on guns? I've notice most on here are left leaning to extreme left, which means most of you think of healthcare as a right to be paid or subsidized by the government. Well, arms are an actual Right, so where is my free government provided bazooka?

I don't know any Democrats (or republicans/libertarians/greens/bull moose) who still have a flip phone.

So your entire premise is invalid, sorry.

Is that your phone?

 

[Fogdog]

“Well-regulated” in 18th-century English means “can hit the target” and has no implication of what we 21st-century types think of in terms of regulation. this is one of the most pernicious etymological canards pushed on us by the enemies of the Second Amendment. Don’t be one such.

That's not what they meant. But nice spin. Funny actually, so, thanks for the laugh.

 

[cannabineer]

The argument is that you’re 43 times more likely to kill yourself or your family with a gun

you’re trying to change the subject because you suck at this

Statistics fail before the legal prose. You foment false statistics to promote your version of due Grosse Luege. You continue to exploit the weapons of your true cultural heroes.

Produce the numbers and their source, Herr Himmler.

 

[UncleBuck]

Lol

you can just google “43 times” and google auto fills the rest

you suck ass, klannabineer

 

[Justin-case]

As it becomes more and more difficult to purchase, license, load and store guns it will become a common sight to see gun nuts lashing out online. Winning.

 

[cannabineer]

That's not what they meant. But nice spin. Funny actually, so, thanks for the laugh.

Prove it. Bet you cannot. Which means that you too are a proponent Of the Big Lie.
You hate civil gun ownership precisely because it is the bulwark against what happened inn Germany on the 30s. You expose yourself, Vladimir.

 

[DwayneWayne]

I am not sure that is an endorsement, if you’ll forgive me.

I am just sick and tired of the idiots who maintain (without the support of the numbers, unless they’ve hairdressed them) that the police are adequate to the task.

It was.

 

[cannabineer]

As it becomes more and more difficult to purchase, license, load and store guns it will become a common sight to see gun nuts lashing out online. Winning.

Nice riposte, Baldy. Post supporting statistics,

 

[cannabineer]

It was.

Same challenge. Show supporting data.

 

[DwayneWayne]

The stat is real

you defended a racist birther conspiracy theorist

your credibility is zero

Zomg you are a literal toddler.

 

[Justin-case]

Prove it. Bet you cannot. Which means that you too are a proponent Of the Big Lie.
You hate civil gun ownership precisely because it is the bulwark against what happened inn Germany on the 30s. You expose yourself, Vladimir.

Do you really expect a generation of children terrorized by gun violence to give two fucks about your gub rights?

 

[Fogdog]

As it becomes more and more difficult to purchase, license, load and store guns it will become common to see gun nuts lashing out online. Winning.

Ha, good point. The thing is, the gun nuts are stepping up "lashing out online" because they are losing the willingness of people to believe that shit. Nothing of any consequence has passed into law. The howling we hear from them is because there is a growing opposition to their political power. Nothing has happened. Yet.

 

[cannabineer]

Do you really expect a generation of children terrorized by gun violence to give two fucks about your gub rights?

The terrorism by “gun violence” is a media artifact, as you well know.

Distinguish “ gun violence” from “human violence” for me iff you will.
I have found this to fail every non-dogmatic logic test.

 

[Justin-case]

Zomg you are a literal toddler.

We're going to regulate the piss out of your gub rights, even more than they already are. And in the rare instance you do use your gubs in self defense, we're going to ruin your life with litigation.

 

[DwayneWayne]

Lots of dogs are looking for good foster homes. Don't have to pay shit.

I would put money on my wife being safer than you/yours in the case of a home invasion.
View attachment 4509500

Bullshit go get shots, food, regular checkups for a decade after decade and I get an american made double action SCCY and a box of bullets for under $350 and am good to go forever.

You haven't thought this through and it shows.

 

[Fogdog]

Prove it. Bet you cannot. Which means that you too are a proponent Of the Big Lie.
You hate civil gun ownership precisely because it is the bulwark against what happened inn Germany on the 30s. You expose yourself, Vladimir.

Where did I say I hate civil gun ownership?

All I want is that the US have the same low rates of death and injury due to firearms as other similar nations, such as Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, UK and others. Is that too much to ask?