Did i flush to early on my auto?

[Wattzzup]

flush buddy do not listen to these do not flush idiots lol potassium and nitrogen just does not go magically poof when u store them in jars for 2-3 months it does not evaporate either so were does it go ?

How many more weeks does he have @rob333? I need a good laugh

 

[Wattzzup]

telling people not to flush when all it does is creates bad weed

So does telling someone to chop 3 weeks early dummy

your mom should of flushed

 

[Nutty sKunK]

Sounds like bro science if I ever heard it mate.

Are you high?

Are u suggesting that if I don’t feed my plants the leaves will stay green?!

That is what you just insinuated. Leaves come second to buds.

It’s just debatable if it gives it a smoother smoke.

 

[coreywebster]

Cannabis Flushing Study on Grow Nutrients I Rx Green

Rx Green’s research study on cannabis flushing explores the truth behind this urban myth in growing nutrients.

www.rxgreentechnologies.com

SUMMARY

• Rx Green Technologies evaluated the effects of different flushing times on chemical profile, flavor, and smoking characteristics in Cannabis flower.
• Flushing periods of 14, 10, 7 and 0 days were imposed on Cherry Diesel.
• No differences were detected between flush treatments for yield, potency, or terpenes.
• Analysis of mineral content of leaves indicated small changes in content of iron and zinc.
• Taste test panelists tended to prefer flower flushed for 0 days.

 

[P10p]

Are you high?

Are u suggesting that if I don’t feed my plants the leaves will stay green?!

That is what you just insinuated. Leaves come second to buds.

It’s just debatable if it gives it a smoother smoke.

Are you suggesting you've studied the anatomy of cannabis and ran enough double blinds to conclusively say you're right? The study posted below cites real science and actually runs against what you claim.

"Nutrients don’t leave the roots but the leaves are metabolised by the plant and used to produce the buds. It doesn’t matter where the nutrients come at that point - it’s getting chopped! Saves a little money I guess too. "

These were your exact words with having no real scientific proof. Just you projecting shit that sounds good in your head. Thats the definition of bro science. Smoke another one friend.

 

[Doug Dawson]

Breeder says 9 weeks im bout to start week 11. I will hook her up with nuts see what she does. Thanks yall

Breeders tend to give time for flowering but not include veg and usually on the low end for marketing. In the end your plant cannot read the package so it doesn't care what the seller claims. More important to learn to talk to the plants and not the breeders.[/QUOTE]

 

[bk78]

Are you aware that no one likes 60% of your comments?

Can you post the spreadsheet and show details of where you got the 60% from?

 

[Nutty sKunK]

Are you suggesting you've studied the anatomy of cannabis and ran enough double blinds to conclusively say you're right? The study posted below cites real science and actually runs against what you claim.

"Nutrients don’t leave the roots but the leaves are metabolised by the plant and used to produce the buds. It doesn’t matter where the nutrients come at that point - it’s getting chopped! Saves a little money I guess too. "

These were your exact words with having no real scientific proof. Just you projecting shit that sounds good in your head. Thats the definition of bro science. Smoke another one friend.

Dont see no study posted. I did read one recently about a certain element (can’t remember what one) was actually higher in the flushed buds. So I know what you’re on about there.

I think it’s common knowledge that plants can cannibalise themselves when the nutrients are low in order to flower or fruit?

So what exactly did I say that’s bro science? Posting a statement without the fact? What if the statement is the fact?

 

[P10p]

Dont see no study posted. I did read one recently about a certain element (can’t remember what one) was actually higher in the flushed buds. So I know what you’re on about there.

I think it’s common knowledge that plants can cannibalise themselves when the nutrients are low in order to flower or fruit?

So what exactly did I say that’s bro science? Posting a statement without the fact? What if the statement is the fact?

Again, you dont seem to understand the difference between a scientifically proven fact and what you reference as "common knowledge".

Post #24 is what I was referring to.

 

[bk78]

Again, you dont seem to understand the difference between a scientifically proven fact and what you reference as "common knowledge".

Post #24 is what I was referring to.

Well your scientifically proven fact was done by a nutrient company that even incorporates a flush on their feed chart

so there’s that

 

[P10p]

Well your scientifically proven fact was done by a nutrient company that even incorporates a flush on their feed chart

so there’s that

View attachment 4593157

Great point and no argument there. But at least you have some data. Its much better than referring to "common knowledge" that isn't that common at all considering how much debate there is around this topic.

If its proven that flushing helps I'll be the first to switch. But from all real evidence, it seems that its preference at best. I've never stated which are better, my issue is with people who act like their word is fact. But when pressed for something substantial, all I get is "its common knowledge".

 

[P10p]

Well your scientifically proven fact was done by a nutrient company that even incorporates a flush on their feed chart

so there’s that

View attachment 4593157

And to rebuke the point, I trust a study done by a Stephanie Wedryk, Ph.D Horticulture and crop science more than I trust rollitup crowd think. Sorry to hurt all your feelings, but this is a real scientist who can present real results.

 

[spek9]

Great point and no argument there. But at least you have some data. Its much better than referring to "common knowledge" that isn't that common at all considering how much debate there is around this topic.

If its proven that flushing helps I'll be the first to switch. But from all real evidence, it seems that its preference at best. I've never stated which are better, my issue is with people who act like their word is fact. But when pressed for something substantial, all I get is "its common knowledge".

No matter how many studies are released, and which way they lean, flushing, like many other techniques used in cannabis growing, will always remain a personal choice based on subjective opinion, and will continue to cause great debate.

It's just so deeply ingrained and contested that the argument will only be fueled further as new studies are performed and published.

 

[P10p]

No matter how many studies are released, and which way they lean, flushing, like many other techniques used in cannabis growing, will always remain a personal choice based on subjective opinion, and will continue to cause great debate.

It's just so deeply ingrained and contested that the argument will only be fueled further as new studies are performed and published.

Good point, and my first post was just this.

Experiment for yourself and see which works for you.

But for someone to come in here and claim one way or another with no proof is misleading and could end up costing a lot of people flavor and taste based on the ONLY study like this that has been done.

 

[Nutty sKunK]

And to rebuke the point, I trust a study done by a Stephanie Wedryk, Ph.D Horticulture and crop science more than I trust rollitup crowd think. Sorry to hurt all your feelings, but this is a real scientist who can present real results.

Bet he would agree with me that plants eat themselves.

that was my fucking point all along. do you agree with that statement?

Are u demanding every piece of knowledge needs to be backed up by scientific data?

Knowledge comes before data. Science is just an observation of the event that’s taking place. Not the event itself.

 

[bk78]

And to rebuke the point, I trust a study done by a Stephanie Wedryk, Ph.D Horticulture and crop science more than I trust rollitup crowd think. Sorry to hurt all your feelings, but this is a real scientist who can present real results.

And your only data you came with is some nutrients company. WHO FLUSHES



BRAVO

 

[P10p]

And your only data you came with is some nutrients company. WHO FLUSHES



BRAVO

Sure, make it an attack when you're backed into a corner.

You can easily look up the lead scientist who ran this trial. She has a Bachelors in Chemistry and a Ph.D in Horticulture. She has been training in her discipline for over 10 years.

Internet is hard for you I get it....

 

[P10p]

Bet he would agree with me that plants eat themselves.

that was my fucking point all along. do you agree with that statement?

Are u demanding every piece of knowledge needs to be backed up by scientific data?

Knowledge comes before data. Science is just an observation of the event that’s taking place. Not the event itself.

I'm not demanding anything. All I'm stating is that when you act like you know something that you really don't, you look like an ass. You further this looking like an ass by continuing to be defensive when confronted.

I merely cited scientific proof. Where is your proof that flushing is good "bEcAuse A pLanT EAts iTseLf"?!?

 

[P10p]

Do you really think a scientist with over 10 years in her field is going to flub a trial. Its not like she works as a sales person. RX technologies has a great R&D department that does all kinds of scientific trials.

God you two are thick...

 

[bk78]

Backed into a corner bahahaha