This is a serious question, I have never seen a vagina shot on RIU ever, wikid talks about all these naked chicks avis like its an epidemic, I have not seen one vagina on here!!! Wikid do you consider "naked chick" avis the ones i see every once in while girls in bikinis and what not...are you offended by these? Are bikinis what you consider "naked"? because I never seen any girl naked on RIU, never seen any vag pics, never seen any clit shots. What I have seen were girls in bikinis...............here is a challenge, if you are right about all the naked chick avis, you should be able to find at least one example on RIU
I have 2 of them at least, one with an ass and the flash of the camera in the snizz and another with the chick spread eagle...of course not Zoomed in but still snatch...still ass and snatch is sexual.
I think most r missing the point, Wikids Avatar is not sexual...it is not a claim of desire, it is for comical and debate driven purposes it is 100% obvious...
so many of you are blowing it all out of preportion and basically
PROVING HER RIGHT,...of the double standard.
You guys act like shes posting child porn or pics of beastiality...
Gross inhuman things.
Or you act like what she really put up is similar to the chick avatars on here,...
Seriously put a mask on her dumb ass some make up and make the pic less sex more funny FIRST
Before you even try to compare wikis AV to any skank one on here...do that then theyll be more equal...
But come on if someone doesnt see the double standard their diluted and denying it...
The Avatar she posted was clearly photoshopped to reduce the sexual part of the penis with comical weed relevant things...
none of the WHORE ones even have anything to do with weed so at least hers is SITE RELEVANT and less shocking/offensive...
So go ahead back up us who defended Wikid by trying to compare them AVs some more because all you do is PROVE HER POINT ONCE AGAIN...
There is a double standard for whore AVs over ones customized for chicks. Face it.