Smallbud
Well-Known Member
Who gives a shit you childish dick.You’re
One thing's for certain every problem here seems to attract your childish behaviour.
Who gives a shit you childish dick.You’re
Say it with a little more authority next timeWho gives a shit you childish dick.
One thing's for certain every problem here seems to attract your childish behaviour.
Wtf are you wittering about?Still waiting for the pictures of the sap samples a week prior to harvest and their EC readings.
Wittering? You don't have to prove anything, just like you didn't prove you flushed nutrients out of your plant.Wtf are you wittering about?
I've nothing to prove to you, that's funny.
Right wtf is this question I'm avoiding, you've lost me lol
You know the result take from it what you want.Wittering? You don't have to prove anything, just like you didn't prove you flushed nutrients out of your plant.
You literally quoted the question I've asked multiple times that I'm waiting for the answer for.
You didn't post a baseline. You know you didn't prove anything.You know the result take from it what you want.
He doesn't even know the source of his "sap". If you've followed the thread you'll notice he's deflected all my direct questions regarding his experiment where he proved he flushed nutrients.Wouldn’t the plant pull from the wick? Not wick pull from the plant? Did you access a “tap” for the sap? Iv noticed with my plants. The ones leaning on the thicker side. If injured it heals rather quickly. Avoiding any fluids loss.
So I’m curious Like celery I guess. Wouldn’t it suck in the water from the cup. Not water suck the sap from the plant? How could you get an accurate ec measurement without being directly “tapped” into the plants nutrition intake?
I proved for myself that water at the end isn't bull.You didn't post a baseline. You know you didn't prove anything.
Gotcha. You proved nothing.I proved for myself
No it doesn't pull from the wick, it's not any different to tapping a tree, I was plugged directly into the plants nutrient uptake it can't stem a piece of capillary mat.Wouldn’t the plant pull from the wick? Not wick pull from the plant? Did you access a “tap” for the sap? Iv noticed with my plants. The ones leaning on the thicker side. If injured it heals rather quickly. Avoiding any fluids loss.
So I’m curious Like celery I guess. Wouldn’t it suck in the water from the cup. Not water suck the sap from the plant? How could you get an accurate ec measurement without being directly “tapped” into the plants nutrition intake?
Wtf have you got, I'll try again I DID PROVE THAT WATER AT THE END IS NOT BULL...Gotcha. You proved nothing.
Which sap did you sample? The xylem of phloem?No it doesn't pull from the wick, it's not any different to tapping a tree, I was plugged directly into the plants nutrient uptake it can't stem a piece of capillary mat.
You have to have a baseline EC to compare your end results. I mean... It's not THAT hard.Wtf have you got, I'll try again I DID PROVE THAT WATER AT THE END IS NOT BULL...
Yes it started at 1.2 and ended in 0.0 is that sufficient it's gotten fkg boring.You have to have a baseline EC to compare your end results. I mean... It's not THAT hard.
Nothing, dumb and dumber are having a scientific discussion, it’s above our heads.What is this about? Sap and what?
So when you tap a tree, you're removing nutrient from the tree?No it doesn't pull from the wick, it's not any different to tapping a tree, I was plugged directly into the plants nutrient uptake it can't stem a piece of capillary mat.
What exactly did you prove?Wtf have you got, I'll try again I DID PROVE THAT WATER AT THE END IS NOT BULL...