Despite my snark, this is actually a topic I have a great interest in. Sean Carroll makes a compelling case that hypotheses involving immortal souls having influence over our brains have been ruled out by experiments. The fundamental laws of physics underlying everyday life are completely understood and do not allow for the existence of souls. In any event, people proposing such hypotheses should be held to the same standards as the physicists who further our understanding of the world.
SciAm article/post from ten years ago
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/physics-and-the-immortality-of-the-soul/
and a technical paper appearing soon / recently published in the Journal of Consciousness Studies!
https://philpapers.org/rec/CARCAT-31
that all supposes a "soul" is a physical object that takes up mass, uses energy of some kind, like an organ...i've never once thought it was a physical object. i honestly don't think of it as a "soul" in the traditional sense, to me it's just your consciousness, your self awareness. i don't have any kind of scientific explanation, this is one of those areas where science falls short of being useful. there are physics, then there are metaphysics. i do not believe in ghosts, angels, leprechauns, fairies, or pixies...the only trolls i'm aware of reside in the politics section...
but if we do have a "soul"..it's not going to be measured with a meter, weighed on a scale, or distilled into a flask...
I was a true and sincere asshole for a long time. some will tell you i still am, but i've been trying for the last decade and a half to do the right thing, live a decent life. it took me quite a while to start doing the right thing for the right reasons...you aren't nice to people so you can get into heaven, you are nice to people just because it's the right thing to do...doing anything in the hopes of getting a reward (in the form of heaven) turns it into something much less noble...much less healthy.