It's such a stupid question.
It's such a stupid question.
citing a neo nazi website because rachel maddow makes you cry with facts.Don’t freak out, this first one is a breitbart link
Nolte: Rachel Maddow's 17 Most Audacious Russia Hoax Lies
Here is a list of Rachel Maddow's 17 most audacious, reckless, and dangerous lies surrounding the Russia Collusion Hoax.www.breitbart.com
‘Why no retraction?' Obstinate Rachel Maddow hangs on to thoroughly debunked scare story
Maddow and liberal media outlets ran with a debunked story claiming that Oklahoma hospitals were overflowing with overdoses of ivermectin.www.bizpacreview.com
Even the left of center politifact rates her at nearly 50/50
PolitiFact | Rachel Maddow
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.www.politifact.com
But no she’s totally honest, doesn’t push propaganda, and doesn’t have an agenda
Just wanted to compliment your ability to sound smart when saying something dumb. Good job!You are using links on the wrong side of the reality divide. Those are hard-right agitprop quite unmoored from fact.
That is the Russian perspective of AmericaCable News Network is full of political opinion programming. Every major television network has opinion pieces full of half truths and nameless sources.
Okay you finally stumped me.citing a neo nazi website because rachel maddow makes you cry with facts.
you are pathetic, small-penised
So Tucker and The Five?I always wonder why defamation suits arnt more common.
I take issue with “reporters” who knowingly publish false information, especially when they use “anonymous sources” which can literally spew anything. Once the article comes out and the headline is published, the damage is already done even if they come back with a correction later. As so many consume news via headlines and form their entire worldview based off the first paragraph.
There are four elements a person must establish in order to prove he or she has been defamed:
- Publication,
- Identification,
- Harm and
- Fault
You are trying to create a false equivalencyno one said she’s not pushing an agenda, you just said she tells the truth and facts you can check. My last sentence was sarcasm. I’m merely pointing out she does in fact lie as do many left-side media personalities. It’s not a phenomenon unique to the right
Fake news.
MEME's when facts don't substantiate your position
trumptards forget this is all about trying to fix another trump racist policy and fuck up.MEME's when facts don't substantiate your position
So that's why they seem to only be able to communicate with memes.MEME's when facts don't substantiate your position
I'm not. YOU'RE an illiterate idiot.Your in Canada your opinion isn't valid. We have to live with these terrible ideas and policies....View attachment 5022449
They can't censor memes with algorithms.So that's why they seem to only be able to communicate with memes.
Yet, I knew your stupid fucking meme was bullshit and you didn’t.Your in Canada your opinion isn't valid.
It blows my fucking mind that half the country has opted to accept that crap as fact. What the hell happened. I don't recall people trotting the national enquirer out as a factual source growing up, we all knew it was that silly magazine at the grocery store that you laughed at the headlines. Just what the fuck.agreed. those supermarket tabloids with headlines like "john travolta has secret alien housekeeper" are written by journalists. are they good ones? hell no.
the sizzle is what sells.
Sure they can. You like memes because you lack a sophisticated enough thought process to comprehend complex issues.They can't censor memes with algorithms.
From someone as unmoored from fact as you are, it actually is a compliment. Thanks.Just wanted to compliment your ability to sound smart when saying something dumb. Good job!