Anyone else watching the Kyle Rittenhouse trial?

mooray

Well-Known Member
i apologize to all. Ill do my best to play nice. Truce?
Unfortunately, it doesn't quite work that way. A pro-republican stance will be met with hostility and you probably won't be able to reply with that same hostility, or else you'll get the boot. You can say republican things, but you'll have to ignore some posts and not get sucked in, which is much easier said than done. Their house, their rules, no way around it. I'm always happy to discuss republican views with minimal vitriol, but some others have been literally dealing with righty trolls for years and they're pretty well over it.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Ah, felony skedaddling. serious charge there. Almost as bad as first degree kerfuffling.

from "traveling to a different state to LARP" to "crossing state borders to avoid arrest" when he returns to his home state. lol wut.


Also I thank fake god for the social media stream from the illegally armed gunshot rioter, otherwise people might be dumb or sheepish enough to believe what you said about rittenhouse avoiding police. Its documented from multiple angles of video that he went straight to the cops, audibly said so on the way, and was chased and attacked on his way to do so.
Why would an innocent person run away after he shot three people? He walked right past the police and talked to them. There weren't any people chasing him at that time.

I see that you are trying to score talking points by mocking this point but you haven't made a critical argument, just a childish insult.

It's sounding more and more that you think Rittenhouse is guilty but can't handle admitting it.
 

xtsho

Well-Known Member
I have a box of latex gloves. I didn't know I could get away with murder by wearing them. Damn, I'm a first responder.
 

madvillian420

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately, it doesn't quite work that way. A pro-republican stance will be met with hostility and you probably won't be able to reply with that same hostility, or else you'll get the boot. You can say republican things, but you'll have to ignore some posts and not get sucked in, which is much easier said than done. Their house, their rules, no way around it. I'm always happy to discuss republican views with minimal vitriol, but some others have been literally dealing with righty trolls for years and they're pretty well over it.
I do not now nor have i ever had a "righty" or "pro republican" stance. Im a nuanced person with widely varying array of thoughts and opinions.

Id be closer to embracing and desiring libertarianism or even anarchism than any right vs left garbage. if you need to slap labels on things. I make an effort to not have bias when making judgements, FAR too much willing and blatant partisan crap everywhere. this place isnt the only echo chamber circle jerk of social justice warriors, its fucking everywhere unfortunately.
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
tRump is an Anarchist. He sure aint Democrat, or Republican. He thrives on discombobulation, and chaos.
Libertarians are also nuts. Just look at Rand Paul. MFr was swimming at the Senate pool, waiting for his Covid results, and his results were positive, and he knew he was potentially positive. And the Mfr is supposed to be a doctor. His dad is also a nut, though he had a few things I agreed with, but not enough to vote for him.
And neither of them are true libertarians either.
 
Last edited:

madvillian420

Well-Known Member
tRump is an Anarchist. He sure aint Democrat, or Republican. He thrives on discombobulation, and chaos.
Libertarians are also nuts. Just look at Rand Paul. MFr was swimming at the Senate pool, waiting for his Covid results, and his results were positive, and he knew he was potentially positive. And the Mfr is supposed to be a doctor. His dad is also a nut, though he had a few things I agreed with, but not enough to vote for him.
And neither of them are true libertarians either.
cool story bro
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
i apologize to all. Ill do my best to play nice. Truce?
Never went to war with you. No need for a truce, just stop lying and berating people who have good reason to differ with your take.

Rittenhouse shot a man who presented no threat to him. He shot the guy in the back while he was moving away from him. That is a fact. He was asked to call 911 and did not. He called a friend and told him he had just shot somebody. That is a fact. With that knowlege in mind, he walked right past the police while others were yelling that he had shot somebody. That is a fact. It is a fact that he fled justice, crossed state borders and was a fugitive from justice when arrested. Rittenhouse did not behave like an innocent man during and after the moments he shot those people that is my opinion based upon those facts.

If you want to use cherry picked minutia from videos you find online, nothing to stop you and nothing to stop me from telling you the facts as I see them. But I think the real and honest scrutiny of what happened will happen in court and I don't know what those jurors are going to decide. All I know is Rittenhouse acted like he did it on the night of the killings.
 

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
tRump thrives on chaos, and confusion. Hes an authoritarian autocrat if anything. And is only out for himself


While I think the kid is guilty, he didnt bring the weapon across state lines. His sisters boyfriend lives in Wisconsin, and gave it to him, and has also been charged with a crime.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
When it comes to "medic services", you totally want a kid with an illegally obtained AR15 that he smuggled across state lines to tend to you
Especially one that has no training or experience- lawsuit waiting to happen.
He wasn't cleaning graffiti either....

Boy with gun goes looking for trouble, finds and becomes the trouble he was looking for.

Problem is how easily boy obtained said gun but no talk on how this shouldn't be so easy... "Murika"!
 
Top