hanimmal
Well-Known Member
My apologies, when I stepped out of that discussion you had only posted an accusatorial news piece. I didn't see your later posts. I will take a look at what you posted.
My apologies, when I stepped out of that discussion you had only posted an accusatorial news piece. I didn't see your later posts. I will take a look at what you posted.
What is the point of a holster without something being, um.I'm definitely staying stoned . We are witnessing the resurrection of " The Old West". Holsters and black cowboy hat sales will go through the roof !
on Wall St. they call it 'shorting'.Over the years I have seen him in action. I have never seen him do anything positive for the community other than trying to incite or profit off upheaval. There are some really good pastors in the black community but he is NOT one.
Maybe you didn't see any proof because you weren't looking.If Trump provided data to the Russian military that endangered the lives of US Troops that would be significant. I haven't seen any proof of the claim but I am open to the idea. Do you have anything outside of accusation?
Donald Trump approves.
One more time...There's at least twelve people in Wisconsin who would disagree with you.they can use whatever half asses excuse they want to use, rittenhouse murdered and walked free, and a geriatric fuck in a robe he isn't good enough to wear let it happen...every murderous little white supremacist fuck in the country has a hard on right now, as they clean their ar-15s...cause now they know they can go out and murder people and get away with it
Is this the same incident @hanimmal is referencing? There was new controversy daily with Trump. That wikipedia entry ends with the following in regards to the extraction of the CIA agent. "A CIA spokesperson said the news reports were "misguided speculation", and a White House spokesperson said the reporting was "incorrect" and "has the potential to put lives in danger," although they did not specify why they considered the reporting flawed."Maybe you didn't see any proof because you weren't looking.
Donald Trump's disclosures of classified information - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Maybe you are playing a child's game of gotcha. The people endangered by Trump's leak were not troops but high level intelligence agents, not US but agents working for our allies. The guy who pretends he doesn't like Trump is defending him? I think your sock has a hole in it. Time for a new one.
Disclosure in May 2017[edit]
President Donald Trump discussed classified information provided by a U.S. ally regarding a planned Islamic State operation during an Oval Office meeting on May 10, 2017 with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and the Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, providing sufficient details that could be used by the Russians to deduce the identity of the ally and the manner in which it was collected, according to current and former government officials.[3][4][5][6][7] The meeting had been closed to the U.S. press, although a photographer from the Russian press contingent was present.[1] The disclosure was first reported in The Washington Post on May 15, 2017. White House staff initially denied the report, but the following day Trump defended the disclosure, stating that he has the "absolute right" to "share" intelligence with Russia.[8]
Year gonna need a hat partner.........beautiful f'ing work !
I know. I could of had a list a mile long. Just trying to float the idea. Bad example. I need to focus and spend more time thinking through these matters.What is the point of a holster without something being, um.
Holsted.
HonestlyHonestly I don’t know who those men are except the first one I saw on passing on the news. If you don’t think Al Sharpton is a grifter you are absolutely out of your mind.
Once again projection or confessionYou seem to be manifesting things out of thin air. If someone attempts to run your good name through the mud, potentially influencing a trial that could cost you this life, repercussions via bleeding money are one of the only legal remedies. This goes for White, Black, and Purple people. I understand you have a hatred of white supremacy, that is understandable. However, falsely labeling individuals by media corps is wrong. The boy who cried wolf comes to mind.
Once again projection or confession
SOS
there's this thing called "intent"...i'm fairly certain Obama's intent was to show that he thought something was ok....i'm also fairly certain that when a fascist white supremacist thug displays the same symbol, it does not carry the same intent, that it is meant to be a symbol of white hate. you, being the enormous asshole you are, know this, and know that we know it as well, so why do you keep trying to convince us when we all know you're full of horseshit...and horse semen?
Why does that horse have 5 legs?here, i'll leave the two of you alone for a while....View attachment 5032014
kickstand....Why does that horse have 5 legs?
You're dealing with ubiquitous aspects of language that held zero historical negative connotations prior to an online message board trolling a political group. You proved their point. The word you are looking to demonize is "okay". Do you think it's a good idea to allow individuals to be the sole arbiters of speech and symbol when determining who can and cannot use a word or sign? That's what you're attempting to do. Thankfully, society hasn't reached a consensus on OK being hateful. The people who did so took it upon themselves after being trolled, without the remainder of civilized society.there's this thing called "intent"...i'm fairly certain Obama's intent was to show that he thought something was ok....i'm also fairly certain that when a fascist white supremacist thug displays the same symbol, it does not carry the same intent, that it is meant to be a symbol of white hate. you, being the enormous asshole you are, know this, and know that we know it as well, so why do you keep trying to convince us when we all know you're full of horseshit...and horse semen?