Erniedytn
Master of Mayhem
Same shit different day my friend
Conspiracy Theories
- Thread starter Erniedytn
- Start date
ozstone
Well-Known Member
I havent seen this one in here yet have a read, it can come across a bit wierd but in essence it sometimes makes sense sort of, i need a cone
www.sweetliberty.org/perspectivejewishpersecutionintro.htm
or just google jewish persecution
have fun
Oz
www.sweetliberty.org/perspectivejewishpersecutionintro.htm
or just google jewish persecution
have fun
Oz
jesus3
Well-Known Member
area 51 i think you know something about this.peace.Whose got one
Lets hear it
Erniedytn
Master of Mayhem
There is more to this theory than you think. Two passages I like in particular:
1) This is a classic example of the Hegelian dialectic in practice where a problem is created and crisis-managed to a pre-determined resolution. All this is brought into sharp focus in this examination of the increasing influence of Talmudic Judaism in America and the world to the detriment of Jew and non-Jew alike
2) After reading Jackie Patru's "Persecution of the Jews", consider this thought: Spiritual consciousness is the only solution to problems created by material consciousness. When men practice the highest ideal of religion -- love of God -- there can be no conflict.
My interest in this subject delves waaaaaay deeper than the Jewish faith though. But this is just another prime example of how easy the masses are manipulated.
Erniedytn
Master of Mayhem
We could start a whole new forum on this subject. No real mystery here thougharea 51 i think you know something about this.peace.
Chiceh
Global Mod, Stoner Chic
Ya what goes on there now? What went on there in the past? So many questions.We could start a whole new forum on this subject. No real mystery here though
skunkushybrid
New Member
Top secret research... research that is priceless to countries like ours. Hence the secrecy.
Erniedytn
Master of Mayhem
What do you think is going on there?
sasarchiver
Well-Known Member
i wrote abig thing on this subject the other day and accidently hit the back button on my mouse Grrrr....
When i was younger i liked the JFK assaination. I remember when i first saw it, the bullet to the head shot (by socalled lee H Oswald). I must have been, pheww, atleast 15-16yrs old, im going back a lonngggg time lol even then i knew the shot to the head wasnt fired by from behind, its clear hes shot from the front, his head moves back and to the left=front to the right. what i always remember thinking was i bet if this was evidence in a case, not jfk, but ur normal joe bloggs, would it be admissable?? wasnt untill the movie, JFK, came out and u see the fatal shot, but milli seconds after jfk is hit, govenor connelly is seen being hit, after jfk. thats a strange one. if u have the film or the clip, watch it, but dont look at jfk, look at the man infront of him.
anyways, then 9/11. When it happened it didnt cross my mind it was a conspiracy as i was to dam angry, im not american but i still felt horrified by it. only thing i didnt get was when u see bush being told in that classroom, he just sat there. why wasnt he wisked away. I didnt get that but thought no more of it. Then about 6months later i started hearing things that didnt add up. Main one at the Time, was WTC 7, there heard on news footage radios that there away to PULL building 7, that takes months to plan and setup. I know this cause ive been part of 4 high rise buildings being PULLED and it took several months, isnt easy.
Then i heard alot of specualtion, no proof, so i was abit weary of a conspiracy. then u started seeing pentagon footage etc etc.
Theres too much to mention. One thin i saw was mike ruperts true and lies of 9/11. I liked that cos theres no specualtion, he has it all in black and white. he doesnt go into a conspiracy but he gives u facts about how the us works, builds econimes etc. And the CIA, he says alot about that. if u have a chance watch it, it gives u a different look on it that no-one else has done yet. BTW he doesnt even go into what happened that day.
definetly something wrong with the whole picture thats for dam sure.
there has only ever been 3 high rise building to collapse cos of a fire and they are WTC 1 and 2, and WTC 7......A B52 hit the empire state building in the 60s, i think, that didnt collapse, infact the fire didnt go very far.
When i was younger i liked the JFK assaination. I remember when i first saw it, the bullet to the head shot (by socalled lee H Oswald). I must have been, pheww, atleast 15-16yrs old, im going back a lonngggg time lol even then i knew the shot to the head wasnt fired by from behind, its clear hes shot from the front, his head moves back and to the left=front to the right. what i always remember thinking was i bet if this was evidence in a case, not jfk, but ur normal joe bloggs, would it be admissable?? wasnt untill the movie, JFK, came out and u see the fatal shot, but milli seconds after jfk is hit, govenor connelly is seen being hit, after jfk. thats a strange one. if u have the film or the clip, watch it, but dont look at jfk, look at the man infront of him.
anyways, then 9/11. When it happened it didnt cross my mind it was a conspiracy as i was to dam angry, im not american but i still felt horrified by it. only thing i didnt get was when u see bush being told in that classroom, he just sat there. why wasnt he wisked away. I didnt get that but thought no more of it. Then about 6months later i started hearing things that didnt add up. Main one at the Time, was WTC 7, there heard on news footage radios that there away to PULL building 7, that takes months to plan and setup. I know this cause ive been part of 4 high rise buildings being PULLED and it took several months, isnt easy.
Then i heard alot of specualtion, no proof, so i was abit weary of a conspiracy. then u started seeing pentagon footage etc etc.
Theres too much to mention. One thin i saw was mike ruperts true and lies of 9/11. I liked that cos theres no specualtion, he has it all in black and white. he doesnt go into a conspiracy but he gives u facts about how the us works, builds econimes etc. And the CIA, he says alot about that. if u have a chance watch it, it gives u a different look on it that no-one else has done yet. BTW he doesnt even go into what happened that day.
definetly something wrong with the whole picture thats for dam sure.
there has only ever been 3 high rise building to collapse cos of a fire and they are WTC 1 and 2, and WTC 7......A B52 hit the empire state building in the 60s, i think, that didnt collapse, infact the fire didnt go very far.
TheConstantGardner
Well-Known Member
I audited "Physics for Future Presidents" class taught by Professor Muller of Berkeley University. One of his colleagues worked in Area 51 during the "Roswell Incident". In actuality, this is what happened:
It was discovered that sound channels existed in the ocean and in the atmosphere. During the war, pilots were given metal spheres to drop in the ocean if they were shot down. The spheres would sink, and when they reached a certain depth, they would collapse releasing a powerful sound wave. This wave would travel a very long distance in this sound channel. Using monitoring stations, they could triangulate their position for rescue.
Next, they discovered similar sound channels in the atmosphere. They sent large balloons up into this sound channel to monitor for telltale sounds of nuclear testing by Russia. Of course, we didn't want anybody else to have this kind of monitoring ability as we were carrying out our own nuclear tests.
This was the big secret, and reason for cover up carried out by our government in Roswell.
It was discovered that sound channels existed in the ocean and in the atmosphere. During the war, pilots were given metal spheres to drop in the ocean if they were shot down. The spheres would sink, and when they reached a certain depth, they would collapse releasing a powerful sound wave. This wave would travel a very long distance in this sound channel. Using monitoring stations, they could triangulate their position for rescue.
Next, they discovered similar sound channels in the atmosphere. They sent large balloons up into this sound channel to monitor for telltale sounds of nuclear testing by Russia. Of course, we didn't want anybody else to have this kind of monitoring ability as we were carrying out our own nuclear tests.
This was the big secret, and reason for cover up carried out by our government in Roswell.
skunkushybrid
New Member
Yup. Sounds about right to me. Of course people would much rather believe they kept aliens there.
skunkushybrid
New Member
Not me.....
fishindog
Well-Known Member
ya my buddy brought that subject up the other day n showed me a vid on youtube...search moon hoaxs and watch the one where the light falls down in the background, wuts up with that??? and there is also one that kinda shows a camera man in a picture...so as of a few days ago i am curious on if we ever really landed there???
skunkushybrid
New Member
I don't need to search anything. Conspiracy theories are always full of shit, and they are doctored or engineered to make you believe what the author(s) want.
skunkushybrid
New Member
Boo-fucking-hoo moron.
skunkushybrid
New Member
What I said wasn't refuted. If it was then I would have responded intelligently.
I am always willing to drop my vocabulary to suit the person I am conversing with.
I am always willing to drop my vocabulary to suit the person I am conversing with.
