Anyone find autos a waste of time?

MtRainDog

Well-Known Member
Nothing wrong with Autos but saying they're on par with photos is a little silly, where's the cup winners? I see no personal reasons to grow Auto's indoors when there's photo's giving you more control in every aspect of growing.
It's hard to work a potential cup winner that you can't clone
 

MATTYMATT726

Well-Known Member
I dunno.. IMO it's "both". We are in no way in a position to discredit someone's personal experience.

Autos can be/are finicky in general, and for every good auto breeder there's probably two or more trash auto breeders. They take WAY MORE skill and love to produce than ANYONE gives them credit for.
But again, isn't the choice between the cheapest seeeds/equipment and good quality up to the grower to research? My very 1st auto grow (here in the auto section) was my 1st using bottom fed autopots, 1st time using HLG Quantum Boards and i topped them as well. I got 10.5 or so oz off of 2 plants under 1- 135 watt light. I researched and i took off. Others blame the "auto" gene and it's not that. It's growers knowledge of the plant and the effort they put in.
 

Nutty sKunK

Well-Known Member
Dinafem Critical and Critical Jack
I was referring to the OP. If you grow a strain called Holy Bananas by donkey dick seeds you’re probably gonna end up with trash.

Choose a respectable breeder and chances are on your side of getting what you want.

I’ve grown a good 30-40 autos and only 1 of them was bunk. Looked good but no smell and a bland high, sherbet by seedstockers. Chances are if I grow it again it’ll be good.

That’s another factor with autos, always has to be from seed. Same with photoperiods barring clones. You can get a dodgy phenotype but again those chances come down to the breeder!

Mesphito are the best for stability. Rocbud, fastbuds and Dutch passion have faired well in my experience. If you can get it Rocbud Slurricane is worth a grow if u want to chance your mind about autos and potency. Some of the most potent weed I’ve consumed!
 

McStrats

Well-Known Member
I travel quite a bit. If I'm off the road for 3 months I grow autos. There's no way I can finish a photo in that time frame. Just posting that for those who don't see a reason to grow autos indoors. They are smaller also and take up less space. There are all kinds of reasons people prefer autos.

If you pick the right genetics and if you are patient with the learning curve, you can grow really good stuff.
 

MannyPacs

Well-Known Member
But again, isn't the choice between the cheapest seeeds/equipment and good quality up to the grower to research? My very 1st auto grow (here in the auto section) was my 1st using bottom fed autopots, 1st time using HLG Quantum Boards and i topped them as well. I got 10.5 or so oz off of 2 plants under 1- 135 watt light. I researched and i took off. Others blame the "auto" gene and it's not that. It's growers knowledge of the plant and the effort they put in.
You seem very knowledgeable on this topic! Do all autos still have ruderalis? Or have they figured out a different way to auto flower? If they still have ruderalis in their genetics, If the right things line up I see no reason why you couldn't get crap ass ruderalis phenos. I'm sure we can all agree grower knowledge or effort has little to do with recessive phenotypes popping up
 

McStrats

Well-Known Member
You seem very knowledgeable on this topic! Do all autos still have ruderalis? Or have they figured out a different way to auto flower? If they still have ruderalis in their genetics, If the right things line up I see no reason why you couldn't get crap ass ruderalis phenos. I'm sure we can all agree grower knowledge or effort has little to do with recessive phenotypes popping up
I am no expert...but my understanding is that autos are still being developed, and the improvements over the last 10 years have been huge. I don't think anyone would deny that. And if the improvements over the next 10 years are anything like the past 10....conversations like this one will be moot. That's just my take.

Also...if we're being fair...photos have been around a lot longer, so it makes sense there are a ton more choices and quality because they have decades of development behind them.

Are photos better? on average....they probably are...although I would put some Mephisto stuff against any photo. For my needs, companies like Mephisto check all the boxes.
 
Last edited:

Kola_Kreator

Well-Known Member
One thing I notice with most autos is that the flower doesn't really finish like a photo. Very rarely do you see photos of autos before harvest with big full swollen bracts and receded hairs. And also the bud to leaf ratio is never looks that good.

There may be exceptions and I have seen some meph strains with a better ratio. But it definitely seems like a common trait in the autos I've grown and the photos I've seen. Seems like it's a genetic thing or maybe most just chop autos early.
 

MATTYMATT726

Well-Known Member
You seem very knowledgeable on this topic! Do all autos still have ruderalis? Or have they figured out a different way to auto flower? If they still have ruderalis in their genetics, If the right things line up I see no reason why you couldn't get crap ass ruderalis phenos. I'm sure we can all agree grower knowledge or effort has little to do with recessive phenotypes popping up
So every bad grown auto(and their are alot) are solely on the genes and we all KNOW it huh? This is why there are bad auto growers and you gotta now research members before you actually waste the time.
 

MtRainDog

Well-Known Member
I mean compared to most auto grows I see on here where the leaves are completely yellow... I wonder if that's an auto trait? (the pronounced senescence I typically see in auto grows)
 

MATTYMATT726

Well-Known Member
Nice, but i refuse to believe i got the EXACT lucky genetic seed every time I've grown autos and the only time I've gotten 1.5 ft tall plants were in 2 liter perlite hempys. My history will show i had to ask wtf was a dampened off seed last year. I tought myslef by reading and like i said, even with tons of new variables, rocked my autos right out of the gate. 9/10 I'm sure the genetics in question might be different, but that's growers choice. Nobody can blame me they smoked their bobby brown, watched Scarface and decided to buy miracle grow and cool man sams donkZy x cookie on "sAlE" and they get 1 cola 8" autos. Those aren't bad though for sure.
 

Kola_Kreator

Well-Known Member
I mean compared to most auto grows I see on here where the leaves are completely yellow... I wonder if that's an auto trait? (the pronounced senescence I typically see in auto grows)
Yep. Don't think I've ever seen an auto that didn't have yellowing/spotting leaves towards the last half of flower. This really is just poor genetics that make them difficult to feed and keep healthy for the entire grow.
 
Top