420 Garden
Well-Known Member
Go after some solid genetics like Night Owl or Mephisto. I can't and won't speak for others but, I have been fortunate with both breeders. Memphisto works their lines very well. Not a lot of variation, very stable.
Dinafem Critical and Critical JackWhat did you grow? Strain/breeder?
It's hard to work a potential cup winner that you can't cloneNothing wrong with Autos but saying they're on par with photos is a little silly, where's the cup winners? I see no personal reasons to grow Auto's indoors when there's photo's giving you more control in every aspect of growing.
But again, isn't the choice between the cheapest seeeds/equipment and good quality up to the grower to research? My very 1st auto grow (here in the auto section) was my 1st using bottom fed autopots, 1st time using HLG Quantum Boards and i topped them as well. I got 10.5 or so oz off of 2 plants under 1- 135 watt light. I researched and i took off. Others blame the "auto" gene and it's not that. It's growers knowledge of the plant and the effort they put in.I dunno.. IMO it's "both". We are in no way in a position to discredit someone's personal experience.
Autos can be/are finicky in general, and for every good auto breeder there's probably two or more trash auto breeders. They take WAY MORE skill and love to produce than ANYONE gives them credit for.
I see you get my point! You also loose the ability to fully dial in a strain and genetic line, because you can only run one cycle.It's hard to work a potential cup winner that you can't clone
I was referring to the OP. If you grow a strain called Holy Bananas by donkey dick seeds you’re probably gonna end up with trash.Dinafem Critical and Critical Jack
You seem very knowledgeable on this topic! Do all autos still have ruderalis? Or have they figured out a different way to auto flower? If they still have ruderalis in their genetics, If the right things line up I see no reason why you couldn't get crap ass ruderalis phenos. I'm sure we can all agree grower knowledge or effort has little to do with recessive phenotypes popping upBut again, isn't the choice between the cheapest seeeds/equipment and good quality up to the grower to research? My very 1st auto grow (here in the auto section) was my 1st using bottom fed autopots, 1st time using HLG Quantum Boards and i topped them as well. I got 10.5 or so oz off of 2 plants under 1- 135 watt light. I researched and i took off. Others blame the "auto" gene and it's not that. It's growers knowledge of the plant and the effort they put in.
I am no expert...but my understanding is that autos are still being developed, and the improvements over the last 10 years have been huge. I don't think anyone would deny that. And if the improvements over the next 10 years are anything like the past 10....conversations like this one will be moot. That's just my take.You seem very knowledgeable on this topic! Do all autos still have ruderalis? Or have they figured out a different way to auto flower? If they still have ruderalis in their genetics, If the right things line up I see no reason why you couldn't get crap ass ruderalis phenos. I'm sure we can all agree grower knowledge or effort has little to do with recessive phenotypes popping up
So every bad grown auto(and their are alot) are solely on the genes and we all KNOW it huh? This is why there are bad auto growers and you gotta now research members before you actually waste the time.You seem very knowledgeable on this topic! Do all autos still have ruderalis? Or have they figured out a different way to auto flower? If they still have ruderalis in their genetics, If the right things line up I see no reason why you couldn't get crap ass ruderalis phenos. I'm sure we can all agree grower knowledge or effort has little to do with recessive phenotypes popping up
You read my comment and that's what you took from it? I take back what I said about you being knowledgeable lolSo every bad grown auto(and their are alot) are solely on the genes and we all KNOW it huh? This is why there are bad auto growers and you gotta now research members before you actually waste the time.
View attachment 5282383View attachment 5282384
Sorry to say, but it is definitely you and NOT autos.
Yep. Don't think I've ever seen an auto that didn't have yellowing/spotting leaves towards the last half of flower. This really is just poor genetics that make them difficult to feed and keep healthy for the entire grow.I mean compared to most auto grows I see on here where the leaves are completely yellow... I wonder if that's an auto trait? (the pronounced senescence I typically see in auto grows)