Legal woes of That Man’s associates
- Thread starter cannabineer
- Start date
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
already?
who wants to explaine to Rudy that the 150mil comes right off the top
who wants to explaine to Rudy that the 150mil comes right off the top
printer
Well-Known Member
What is the point? He still believes in the big lie.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Fascinating that that man’s legal weasels did not object to the phones being turned in. They must have been sure the wipe was complete.
However, Smith’s use of the word “several” suggests “not all”. I sorta hope so. I doubt the wipe was accidental or incidental to the software rollout USSS did. I’m hoping enough evidence turns up to make prosecuting the SS agents and their bosses viable.
I believe that this improbably convenient whoopsie conceals collusion in sedition.
www.newsweek.com
However, Smith’s use of the word “several” suggests “not all”. I sorta hope so. I doubt the wipe was accidental or incidental to the software rollout USSS did. I’m hoping enough evidence turns up to make prosecuting the SS agents and their bosses viable.
I believe that this improbably convenient whoopsie conceals collusion in sedition.
Jack Smith's response to missing Secret Service texts raises questions
In a filing, the special counsel said the devices used by agents around January 6, 2021, had been handed over but contained no "recoverable information."
www.newsweek.com
printer
Well-Known Member
"I accidentally dropped mine in the toilet."Fascinating that that man’s legal weasels did not object to the phones being turned in. They must have been sure the wipe was complete.
However, Smith’s use of the word “several” suggests “not all”. I sorta hope so. I doubt the wipe was accidental or incidental to the software rollout USSS did. I’m hoping enough evidence turns up to make prosecuting the SS agents and their bosses viable.
I believe that this improbably convenient whoopsie conceals collusion in sedition.
Jack Smith's response to missing Secret Service texts raises questions
In a filing, the special counsel said the devices used by agents around January 6, 2021, had been handed over but contained no "recoverable information."
Which reminds me, while working on a heat treat furnace I was concerned about my pager falling off my belt as I squeeze up into the furnace. So I put it on my cart. I can not remember how, but something fell onto the top of my cart and the pager fell and bounced on the floor. One bounce and then 'bloop', into the quench tank (the rack holding the parts drops down and gets quenched in the tank). Being that the tank was 8'x20' by at least 12' deep, management decided to leave the tank filled. Funny thing about that job, I carried a pager, phone and a two way radio. They really liked to be able to get hold of me.
Last edited:
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Something tells me the pros can recover all necessary information from one that has merely been drowned.
printer
Well-Known Member
I have restored equipment that has had a good dunking. Most electronics has a conformal coating on the boards so they are reasonably protected. Ribbon cable connections will get corroded. Our IT department in the program I was with at the college said one of the instructor's laptop was not recoverable, she was besides herself, she did not have a good portion of here course material backed up. I took a shot at it and managed to spin up the drive and make a copy for her. She was very relieved.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Scott Perry under the 14th amendment gun.....
A lawsuit has been filed to remove Congressman Scott Perry, the former chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, from the ballot for violating the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause. The lawsuit alleges that Perry engaged in a conspiracy to incite a violent insurrection on January 6, 2021. It was filed by a local Democratic activist and comes just weeks after Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained Perry's personal text messages in furtherance of his investigation into January 6, 2021.
This latest news comes amid a significant legal battle over the meaning of the 14th Amendment. The Colorado Supreme Court has already ruled that former President Donald Trump should be removed from the state's ballot, while other states like Michigan and Minnesota, have defined the confines of the 14th Amendment differently. One key issue that is distinct in Perry's case, however, is that Perry is not running for President. All of the courts that have decided the issue have assumed that members of Congress are subject to the insurrection clause. The key issue here will be whether the courts are the proper avenue to remove someone from the ballot for violating the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause.
personally all those GOP nut jobs need to be under the 14th gun, especially if Jack Smith has your txt msgs......
A lawsuit has been filed to remove Congressman Scott Perry, the former chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, from the ballot for violating the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause. The lawsuit alleges that Perry engaged in a conspiracy to incite a violent insurrection on January 6, 2021. It was filed by a local Democratic activist and comes just weeks after Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained Perry's personal text messages in furtherance of his investigation into January 6, 2021.
This latest news comes amid a significant legal battle over the meaning of the 14th Amendment. The Colorado Supreme Court has already ruled that former President Donald Trump should be removed from the state's ballot, while other states like Michigan and Minnesota, have defined the confines of the 14th Amendment differently. One key issue that is distinct in Perry's case, however, is that Perry is not running for President. All of the courts that have decided the issue have assumed that members of Congress are subject to the insurrection clause. The key issue here will be whether the courts are the proper avenue to remove someone from the ballot for violating the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause.
personally all those GOP nut jobs need to be under the 14th gun, especially if Jack Smith has your txt msgs......
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
More than Trump's disqualification could hinge on the SCOTUS decision, others like Perry could be affected too, but most of them are from red states though.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Maine is a red state, and look what they did.....even though orange dummy is trying to apeal it, of which i don't see that happening for some reason...then again i'm not they're courts and or Maine scotus for that matter....we'll see....
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
And should start off with a Helluva bang!
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
yes it will
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
think it already has.......And should start off with a Helluva bang!
printer
Well-Known Member
"Please, please, please, pretty please?" "I am so fucked."
Meadows beefs up legal team, asks appeals court to rehear bid to move Georgia charges
Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows asked an appeals court to reconsider his attempt to move his Georgia 2020 election racketeering charges to federal court, while also revealing he has brought on a legal heavyweight as the battle moves forward.
In court papers filed Tuesday evening, Meadows asked the full 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear his bid after a three-judge panel of the court rejected Meadows’s arguments last month. The battle could ultimately reach the Supreme Court.
Succeeding in moving to federal court would give Meadows a pathway to try to assert immunity and get his charges tossed, a tactic that could imperil Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s (D) prosecution of Meadows and other co-defendants, including former President Trump. Willis opposes moving the Meadows case.
It would also broaden the jury pool to less-heavily Democratic areas of northern Georgia, have Meadows’s case overseen by a federal judge and doom chances of his trial being televised.
Meadows also revealed Tuesday that he has expanded his legal team to include Paul Clement, who served as U.S. solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and has previously been floated as a potential nominee to the Supreme Court.
Clement has argued more than 100 cases before the justices, including the court’s three biggest Second Amendment cases in recent years, a controversial dispute concerning a football coach and school prayer and defenses of the Bush administration in many cases related to the war on terrorism.
Meadows also brought on Erin Murphy, a prominent appellate advocate who is Clement’s firm’s other named partner, and associate Zachary Lustbader, court filings show. Meadows also continues to be represented by his existing attorneys.
Meadows, who was indicted alongside Trump and more than a dozen co-defendants, faces two charges over accusations he unlawfully attempted to overturn President Biden’s victory in the Peach State in 2020. Meadows pleaded not guilty.
Under federal law, federal officials can move their criminal charges from state to federal court, a process called removal, if the allegations relate to any act “under color of such office” and the official can present a plausible federal defense.
Meadows argues he should be able to move his charges because he was acting within his capacity as White House chief of staff.
But the 11th Circuit panel, comprising one Republican and two Democratic appointees, ruled last month that only currently serving officials can move their charges under the removal statute.
“That proposition is so novel and expectation-defying that it did not even occur to Georgia to advance it until it was prompted by a supplemental briefing order,” Clement and the other attorneys wrote in court filings Tuesday. “The panel’s decision is profoundly wrong—it defies text, precedent, and common sense—and profoundly consequential.”
thehill.com
Meadows beefs up legal team, asks appeals court to rehear bid to move Georgia charges
Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows asked an appeals court to reconsider his attempt to move his Georgia 2020 election racketeering charges to federal court, while also revealing he has brought on a legal heavyweight as the battle moves forward.
In court papers filed Tuesday evening, Meadows asked the full 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear his bid after a three-judge panel of the court rejected Meadows’s arguments last month. The battle could ultimately reach the Supreme Court.
Succeeding in moving to federal court would give Meadows a pathway to try to assert immunity and get his charges tossed, a tactic that could imperil Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s (D) prosecution of Meadows and other co-defendants, including former President Trump. Willis opposes moving the Meadows case.
It would also broaden the jury pool to less-heavily Democratic areas of northern Georgia, have Meadows’s case overseen by a federal judge and doom chances of his trial being televised.
Meadows also revealed Tuesday that he has expanded his legal team to include Paul Clement, who served as U.S. solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and has previously been floated as a potential nominee to the Supreme Court.
Clement has argued more than 100 cases before the justices, including the court’s three biggest Second Amendment cases in recent years, a controversial dispute concerning a football coach and school prayer and defenses of the Bush administration in many cases related to the war on terrorism.
Meadows also brought on Erin Murphy, a prominent appellate advocate who is Clement’s firm’s other named partner, and associate Zachary Lustbader, court filings show. Meadows also continues to be represented by his existing attorneys.
Meadows, who was indicted alongside Trump and more than a dozen co-defendants, faces two charges over accusations he unlawfully attempted to overturn President Biden’s victory in the Peach State in 2020. Meadows pleaded not guilty.
Under federal law, federal officials can move their criminal charges from state to federal court, a process called removal, if the allegations relate to any act “under color of such office” and the official can present a plausible federal defense.
Meadows argues he should be able to move his charges because he was acting within his capacity as White House chief of staff.
But the 11th Circuit panel, comprising one Republican and two Democratic appointees, ruled last month that only currently serving officials can move their charges under the removal statute.
“That proposition is so novel and expectation-defying that it did not even occur to Georgia to advance it until it was prompted by a supplemental briefing order,” Clement and the other attorneys wrote in court filings Tuesday. “The panel’s decision is profoundly wrong—it defies text, precedent, and common sense—and profoundly consequential.”
Meadows beefs up legal team, asks appeals court to rehear bid to move Georgia charges
Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows asked an appeals court to reconsider his attempt to move his Georgia 2020 election racketeering charges to federal court, while also revealing h…
thehill.com
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
He blew his credibility as a witness when he lied under oath and would need to cough up a lot of GOP congress people with receipts to get a deal from Jack, he doesn't need him to nail Trump and the rest including Mark. I had high hopes for Mark until he blew it by lying, he was the hub of a hub and spoke conspiracy and knows where all the bodies are buried and who wanted a pardon and why. Mark could probably take down dozens of republican congress people and senators with the receipts on his phone and his testimony."Please, please, please, pretty please?" "I am so fucked."
Meadows beefs up legal team, asks appeals court to rehear bid to move Georgia charges
Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows asked an appeals court to reconsider his attempt to move his Georgia 2020 election racketeering charges to federal court, while also revealing he has brought on a legal heavyweight as the battle moves forward.
In court papers filed Tuesday evening, Meadows asked the full 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear his bid after a three-judge panel of the court rejected Meadows’s arguments last month. The battle could ultimately reach the Supreme Court.
Succeeding in moving to federal court would give Meadows a pathway to try to assert immunity and get his charges tossed, a tactic that could imperil Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s (D) prosecution of Meadows and other co-defendants, including former President Trump. Willis opposes moving the Meadows case.
It would also broaden the jury pool to less-heavily Democratic areas of northern Georgia, have Meadows’s case overseen by a federal judge and doom chances of his trial being televised.
Meadows also revealed Tuesday that he has expanded his legal team to include Paul Clement, who served as U.S. solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and has previously been floated as a potential nominee to the Supreme Court.
Clement has argued more than 100 cases before the justices, including the court’s three biggest Second Amendment cases in recent years, a controversial dispute concerning a football coach and school prayer and defenses of the Bush administration in many cases related to the war on terrorism.
Meadows also brought on Erin Murphy, a prominent appellate advocate who is Clement’s firm’s other named partner, and associate Zachary Lustbader, court filings show. Meadows also continues to be represented by his existing attorneys.
Meadows, who was indicted alongside Trump and more than a dozen co-defendants, faces two charges over accusations he unlawfully attempted to overturn President Biden’s victory in the Peach State in 2020. Meadows pleaded not guilty.
Under federal law, federal officials can move their criminal charges from state to federal court, a process called removal, if the allegations relate to any act “under color of such office” and the official can present a plausible federal defense.
Meadows argues he should be able to move his charges because he was acting within his capacity as White House chief of staff.
But the 11th Circuit panel, comprising one Republican and two Democratic appointees, ruled last month that only currently serving officials can move their charges under the removal statute.
“That proposition is so novel and expectation-defying that it did not even occur to Georgia to advance it until it was prompted by a supplemental briefing order,” Clement and the other attorneys wrote in court filings Tuesday. “The panel’s decision is profoundly wrong—it defies text, precedent, and common sense—and profoundly consequential.”
Meadows beefs up legal team, asks appeals court to rehear bid to move Georgia charges
Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows asked an appeals court to reconsider his attempt to move his Georgia 2020 election racketeering charges to federal court, while also revealing h…
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Rudy is done, stick a fork in him. By the end of this month Donald could be done too, with court rulings going against him and losing a fortune in NY while his finances are exposed to the public.
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
he might be done with the money aspects, but Rudy still has Georgia to tend with, and he's also got DC to deal with.......here is the ultimate question.....how in the hell is he gonna pay his lawyers.....
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
good one!