CrackerJax
New Member
What if INCREASING our carbon is the best way to improve our situation? We're hamstringing ourselves with bad science, certainly premature science.
where are you getting your information?So now we base our economy on something which is not proven nor indicated? global temps flatlined in 1998 and have been cooling ever since......
why do they find mammoths under snow and ice?where are you getting your information?
unless NASA is actually a band of treehugging liberals we are still in a warming pattern.
2005 was the warmest since they began recording and 1998's second place record is tied with 2007.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
Have you read the latest EPA report? You should. No one believes (reputable that is) the world is getting warmer. read the last report which was unsuccessfully squashed by the administration. Read up on John Carlin who made the mistake of trying to have a transparent govt. (oops).
um...im sorry...WHAT!?!?!?why do they find mammoths under snow and ice?
planet must have been a lot WARMER at some time, eh?
no, there are many many MANY "epa reports" and i'm not going to spend the next hour googling and sifting.Simple FDD, but can you tax it?? One of the reasons why Gore doesn't want to hear about the sun...
Link to the EPA report.... just google it.
and that just happened naturally, yet global WARMING is man made?there was something called the 'ice age'. hear about it? sharp temperature drop, glaciers, mass extinctions, etc.
my god this is getting so weird.
FDD..... can you link that explanation?
Just get the very latest EPA report, it just came out, even though it is being IGNORED by the administration. Google John Carlin and all will be revealed.
my god this is pathetic. nobody has ever argued that global warming trends can only be caused by human activity. the debate is whether or not the current trend is directly related human-caused co2 emmisions. the facts preceding the argument areand that just happened naturally, yet global WARMING is man made?
am i really explaining this?
so basically you are just looking to argue?my god this is pathetic. nobody has ever argued that global warming trends can only be caused by human activity. the debate is whether or not the current trend is directly related human-caused co2 emmisions. the facts preceding the argument are
1-the earth is in a warming pattern
2-global co2 levels are increasing
thus the real debate is focused on 2 questions
1-is this warming pattern related to co2 levels?
2-(if so) has human activity caused or accelerated this trend.
thats the legitimate scientific debate. choose a side of that debate if you dont want to look silly while discussing the issue. or you can just keep dodging peoples' points and evidence just to feel like some internet champ.
yes, and to refresh your memory i presented counter-evidence and you chose to ignore it and change the subject. so whatever then.I've just shown you a chart which CLEARLY shows no LINKAGE between CO2 and global temps. CO2 is not a pollutant!!! If we had more CO2 the earth would produce more and larger trees and plants.....HORRORS!!!!
so basically you are just looking to argue?
troll.
the planets temps go up. the planets temps go down. been happening for billions of years. money will not fix it. killing your car may make you feel better. do you drive?
what's there to debate? al gore?yes thats it 'troll'. you got me! and i would have gotten away with it too, if it wasnt for you meddling kids.
look, i'll just bow out of your demonstration. i actually thought it was a debate, thus the friction. my bad.
yay a pissing contest!my bad, carry on with your little pissing contest. hope you win.
l