He IS KENYAN PROOF INCLUDED

CrackerJax

New Member
I presume nothing. I see evidence of non disclosure from a President who PROMISED a NEW and HONEST Govt. But what do I see? Obstruction, deflection, finger pointing, and evasiveness.

It is quite obvious, if one merely looks for him/her self.

Typically, any documents suppressed by the President fall under National Security reasons. So his college admissions, papers, birth certificate...national security...or Obama security?
One I can stomach, the other I cannot.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
You guys need to dig a bit. If you haven't noticed...the media is guarding Obamas flank like a wolf. The mainstream for the most part are willing accomplices to this administrations take over and cover ups.

I'm not doing ur homework. How else will you learn? (slams door) :lol:
 

what... huh?

Active Member
These are the same records Bush paid to have withheld. The same records hundreds of thousands of dollars went to determine minimal compliance. School records et al. It is politics as usual. Don't tell me you swallowed the "change" hook... I know you didn't. I am not suggesting he is... Good on any level... I am saying the presumption of treason is mislain.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
These are the same records Bush paid to have withheld. The same records hundreds of thousands of dollars went to determine minimal compliance. School records et al. It is politics as usual. Don't tell me you swallowed the "change" hook... I know you didn't. I am not suggesting he is... Good on any level... I am saying the presumption of treason is mislain.
I reminded Cracker of this same fact pages ago, but every time someone challenges him, he ignores it.

I know you hear me:shock:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
You guys need to dig a bit. If you haven't noticed...the media is guarding Obamas flank like a wolf. The mainstream for the most part are willing accomplices to this administrations take over and cover ups.

I'm not doing ur homework. How else will you learn? (slams door) :lol:
I reminded Cracker of this same fact pages ago, but every time someone challenges him, he ignores it.

I know you hear me:shock:
actually, he just says to figure it out yourself. which simply means "i don't know". :mrgreen:
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Here's the real kicker. I don't think Obama has a US BC.... at all. He can't produce one because there isn't one.... :wink:

I know FDD... oh I know. I just like to make them work a bit. You are a news hound if you can find it. The media is hushing lots up, but it's there for all to see that actually look. Like I said, I'm not doing everyones homework.

It's just a COINCIDENCE that any document which would have Obamas signature and Origin of Birth listed is UNAVAILABLE. That's quite a coincidence....... hooboy.... wake up.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Here's the real kicker. I don't think Obama has a US BC.... at all. He can't produce one because there isn't one.... :wink:

I know FDD... oh I know. I just like to make them work a bit. You are a news hound if you can find it. The media is hushing lots up, but it's there for all to see that actually look. Like I said, I'm not doing everyones homework.

It's just a COINCIDENCE that any document which would have Obamas signature and Origin of Birth listed is UNAVAILABLE. That's quite a coincidence....... hooboy.... wake up.
maybe he's made of jello. :hump::joint::joint:
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I presume nothing. I see evidence of non disclosure from a President who PROMISED a NEW and HONEST Govt. But what do I see? Obstruction, deflection, finger pointing, and evasiveness.

It is quite obvious, if one merely looks for him/her self.

Typically, any documents suppressed by the President fall under National Security reasons. So his college admissions, papers, birth certificate...national security...or Obama security?
One I can stomach, the other I cannot.
These are very valid points regardless of the party lines.
Can anyone that favors Obama refute this?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
There is some interesting things that the birthers have came up with to put together a good conspiracy.

These are very valid points regardless of the party lines.
Can anyone that favors Obama refute this?
I think the biggest point is that it doesn't matter. He provided enough proof to be able to run for president. You don't think that if it had more teeth Hilary wouldn't have used it to get him dismissed. It was her campaign that tried to use it in the first place before anyone picked up on it.

The cert of live birth is all that is needed and Hawaii stated that it is what they issue.

Figure also that any baby that is not born in a hospital under the proof that you want would not be an American citizen if they have one parent that is canadian, english, irish, polish, african, asian, mexican, ect.

I think that there is more important things to worry about than if he has a 48 year old birth certificate which he obviously does not have an origional of.

As for college papers, that is easy, I wouldn't want some of the papers I wrote in my first go around in college put out there either if I was the president, and he doesn't have to. I wrote one bout the moon landing being a hoax, most college students believe that communism is a good thing because it sounds good until you actually learn about it and leave those ideals behind you (just like some think that dismantling the government and just following the constitution disallowing all other new laws is a good thing, or no taxes).

Face it, people like Alex Jones would have a field day with a college paper of Obama's.



Think about how silly it is that people are spending so much time on the birth certificate when they could be talking about something like the war in afghanastan, or how the border drug war is going, and using it as a way to open up the government debate on leagalizing them.

Instead people are being manipulated into going crazy about things that don't matter or are good for our country but they are misinformed about.

House passes resolution 378-0 "Obama born in Hawaii!!"

thinkprogress.org — This evening, the House passed a resolution sponsored by Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) that commemorates Hawaii’s 50th anniversary as a U.S. state by a vote of 378-0. The resolution also contains this provision: “Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii,”
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Wow...You people kill me... So The great USA was fooled by a black man not from here and chosen as the POTUS... OMG..so I guess that we are screwed big time if our National Security is so flawed... Give it a rest and face facts..America chose a black man to run this country after Bush ran it into the ground...There is no proof that he was born in Kenya and its really starting to show how dumb some people are for bring this up...Hate Obama for his views...Thats cool at least you have some ground to stand on...Stop acting like a racist redneck from W Virginia with a 3 grade education married to his sister.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
I could care less his ethnicity....it's his crazy ideas I can't stand.

We'll see about the BC. This issue is starting to steamroll. Four more military cases have been filed. Obama has set up a crisis in the making.

Perhaps he is the Joker.
 
Top