CrackerJax
New Member
You seem to have your head on straight. You bring up some good points.If its not part of the Constitutional Duties, fair enough, thats the law, but it seems like assuring the health of you people should be a priority.
As for the rest of the points you raised, they are entirely specific to the U.S, and above all true. So there is no argument there.
If it were not for the culture in America that involves everyone wanting to sue everyone else, than maybe the premiums would not be so high and the current system would work better.
Just out of interest, are you opposed to change entirely or would you be in favour of (if it was possible, I don't know) a system that allowed those to pay out of pocket if they want to, but also provided cover for those who can't afford to?
Let's get a few things clear. The vast majority of the country is insured for health care. There is no health care crisis in the USA....
Lots of folks who are NOT insured do it by their own CHOICE. That's important.
No one in the USA is ever denied services because they cannot pay. That's the law of the land. Just as an extreme case, if you are homeless and penniless and you get injured, if you go to a hospital or a doctor, you will be treated. So no one goes without. Is having say the health care policy of a US Senator better than no insurance...of course it is, but everyone gets care here in the states.
The last point you made is an important one. Lawyers and lawsuits and tort cases. When a doctor has to pony up $200,000 in liability insurance before he/she can turn on the light switch each and every year, who do you think pays for that? The end user of course. This is a key element in bringing down the costs of private health care further. This is something Obama will not breathe a word of either. The democrats are OWNED by the Tort lawyers and Obama will not call off the dogs. It is this more than anything which drives the cost of medicine up. If Obama called off the lawyers, then the private health care system would BLOSSOM further, and Obama would not be able to gain control of 1/7th of the economy. Obama isn't about fixing the health care system as he is about taking it over. There's a difference.
Good post though...