Seen the commercials looking for your gold?

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
Grow your own.

Gold and Bullets - now let's talk about inflation.

Gold will hold it's own, how much will you pay for bullets when our government tries to ban them?

Peace - :joint::peace:
Guns and bullets another hyped up inflation on consuners like myself:-P,,,I'd me more worried come 2012 if the republicans win, especially in California, and all medical states,,Than it's time to stock up on your buds and find way's to fight the Drug war that is only now a pathway to Freedom. Beware for what you wish for:leaf:
 

lopezri

Well-Known Member
I am fairly certain I didn't say it was going to pop immediately, but it is a good idea to keep your eye on it if you own gold. That is why I used the word soonish. They are still collecting it, once that slows the demand will be high, the price will still rise, and that is when I would be most worried about the pop.

And you should know that consumption is the term used when talking about it in economic terms, consumption is all new finished goods purchased. You were being an ass to tell me to look it up. It was an attempt you continue to use to try to belittle me. You did fail, because I really could care less about your failed vocab lesson.

And you if you can consume gas, you are telling me, that a car with 300k miles on it that has no prayer of moving, is not consumed?


Every one of these are new and get used up. It is considered consumption when it is newly made, and not counted again in GDP. Because it will eventually be replaced when its no longer used.

When you buy new finished goods or services it enters into consumption. Which along with business investment and government and net export make up GDP.

But hey, cannot trust anything math or science if it involves anything about reality of what the government does, according to you, so I guess why even bother measuring things like GDP or inflation.
Ha, ha! Again in the red letters.

You USED to be able to trust the government to give truths and tell the American public what is really going on, but you can't really depend on that now, ever since the Great Depression, The New Deal, the Roswell, NM crash and the two Great Wars!
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Han, I can see you must be currently taking an economics course. You seem to be getting an education, unfortunately you have little experience in the real world. Your mind is young and easily influenced but you have not paid attention in your history classes.

What is happening to the economy is not some sort of "oops" moment, it was planned to happen. If republicans AND democrats can both agree that Deficits are bad, then why do we have them? If Dems and Republicans can agree that the wall street bankers are the ones to blame, then why aren't they punished? If both can agree that wars are bad, then why are we in a constant state of war nearly spanning the entire last century? The only answer that can be the truth is that we have these things because they (Our Leaders) want it to be that way. It is only a logical decision to think this way.


Loprezi, inflation is not caused by Trading with foreign countries, inflation is caused by increasing the money supply. period. The Fed Reserve does not "Back" the dollar with gold, it is backed by a promise.
 

lopezri

Well-Known Member
Han, I can see you must be currently taking an economics course. You seem to be getting an education, unfortunately you have little experience in the real world. Your mind is young and easily influenced but you have not paid attention in your history classes.

What is happening to the economy is not some sort of "oops" moment, it was planned to happen. If republicans AND democrats can both agree that Deficits are bad, then why do we have them? If Dems and Republicans can agree that the wall street bankers are the ones to blame, then why aren't they punished? If both can agree that wars are bad, then why are we in a constant state of war nearly spanning the entire last century? The only answer that can be the truth is that we have these things because they (Our Leaders) want it to be that way. It is only a logical decision to think this way.


Loprezi, inflation is not caused by Trading with foreign countries, inflation is caused by increasing the money supply. period. The Fed Reserve does not "Back" the dollar with gold, it is backed by a promise.
Actually, the U.S. gold standard is backed by gold, kind of. . . in 1873 the U.S. adopted the Gold Standard - de facto. It's a convoluted way to set the standard through silver and foreign exchange.

I never said inflation is caused by trading. I said inflation is caused by the U.S. printing more paper-money w/out having an equal amount of standard to back it.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Actually, the U.S. gold standard is backed by gold, kind of. . . in 1873 the U.S. adopted the Gold Standard - de facto. It's a convoluted way to set the standard through silver and foreign exchange.

I never said inflation is caused by trading. I said inflation is caused by the U.S. printing more paper-money w/out having an equal amount of standard to back it.
The U.S. hasn't been on the gold standard since 1933. We use a system of Fiat Currency: Paper money (and coinage) which has value because the govt. says it does.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Actually, the U.S. gold standard is backed by gold, kind of. . . in 1873 the U.S. adopted the Gold Standard - de facto. It's a convoluted way to set the standard through silver and foreign exchange.

I never said inflation is caused by trading. I said inflation is caused by the U.S. printing more paper-money w/out having an equal amount of standard to back it.

IF we were on a gold standard, then you would be able to walk into a BANK and give them a $20 bill and they would give you a $20 gold eagle coin in exchange. In the real world you need to pay the spot price of Gold ( Currently at $1143 + whatever premium the bullion dealer is charging ( Usually 10%) so now you need to give approx $1300 for a $20 gold eagle coin.

Nixon totally closed the gold window in 1971 completely taking the USA off the gold standard, the USA dollar is not backed by any amount of gold, not 1 ounce. It is fiat and by legal tender laws must be taken in exchange for goods and services. FWIW the USA was originally on the silver standard until the 1873 coin act which demonetized it and put gold in its place.
 

lopezri

Well-Known Member
The U.S. hasn't been on the gold standard since 1933. We use a system of Fiat Currency: Paper money (and coinage) which has value because the govt. says it does.
Well I guess that is kind of right too, but by that logic, the currency of the U.S. ONLY has value because the government says it does. So it only spends here in the U.S. with that value. The rest of the world isn't going to assume it has that value just because our government says it does.

It really does all just boil down to the value of goods, services, or labor.
 
I went the route of silver. One thing I did different than most people is buying pre-1950's currency, A shit ton of silver walking liberties to be exact. Since it is currency and not bullion, I dont pay taxes when I decide to cash it out. I put in about a thousand when silver was at $12, now its at 18 and change. This increase in value is attributed mostly to the decline in the dollar and not an increase in demand. The more the dollar tanks the more my silver is worth, a double edge sword.

Whats Fonzi?bongsmilie
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Well I guess that is kind of right too, but by that logic, the currency of the U.S. ONLY has value because the government says it does. So it only spends here in the U.S. with that value. The rest of the world isn't going to assume it has that value just because our government says it does.

It really does all just boil down to the value of goods, services, or labor.

You just figured it out, thats exactly what fiat means, it means it has value by government decree. Do you think your dollar has intrisic value? its a piece of paper that is backed by a promise. You need to look into the Bretton-Woods treaty to figure out how they made the world HAVE TO USE dollars. It has alot to do with Oil, US protection and globalization.

The actual "Value" of the dollar and ALL currencies depends on the value of Gold. All currencies are pegged to the value of gold, you see Gold is the standard around which all other prices revolve. The price of gold does not change. Gold is the eternal, immutable standard. Gold is priced by the minute worldwide in dollars. If the dollar price of gold rises (as now), the dollar is, in effect, being devalued. All other currencies are compared with the dollar. Thus, if the price of gold rises, that rise effects all other currencies, and thus all currencies move around the dollar, and the dollar in turn fluctuates around gold.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Han, I can see you must be currently taking an economics course. You seem to be getting an education, unfortunately you have little experience in the real world. Your mind is young and easily influenced but you have not paid attention in your history classes.

What is happening to the economy is not some sort of "oops" moment, it was planned to happen. If republicans AND democrats can both agree that Deficits are bad, then why do we have them? If Dems and Republicans can agree that the wall street bankers are the ones to blame, then why aren't they punished? If both can agree that wars are bad, then why are we in a constant state of war nearly spanning the entire last century? The only answer that can be the truth is that we have these things because they (Our Leaders) want it to be that way. It is only a logical decision to think this way.
First congrats, you are right I am getting my actuarial econ degree and going on for a PHD in economics.

I have said this numerous times on this site, but w/e.

But you are wrong, I am not young, I am 30 years old and have been working since I was 13, I have worked in a few different sectors of the economy and advanced to many different positions. I have worked hard, bought a house at 24, put my fiance' through school to get her doctor of Pharm. And now I am able to reap the reward and concentrate full time on school to finish my degree.

I had started out as a education major with concentration in history, before I realized that would be horrifically boring and decided I needed something more advanced. I did not just go to school either, I have studied and read up several books on my own time, and continue to do so. See I did a lot of research to decide which field would be best for me.

Also I am not in a bubble, like some people on this site seem to be. I like to see (and understand) the viewpoint that I had opposed so that I can reformulate my thinking with all the facts. That is actually why I post here, most of you are republicans, and have a very different view about the government being out to get you. And I like the fact everyone here is usually very well informed in their own way, it means that if you want to have a POV hold up you better come with some serious facts, or you will get destroyed. And if you only rely on junk websites and youtube videos pretty much that is what will happen to you.

So when you say 'young mind' as again another way to belittle me, you again fail.

I just disagree and have seen enough of the real world to know how it is. And to think that somehow everyone is out to get you is nonsense. The government is not out to get you, they are just generally people that have little knowledge in the sciences that don't really understand their advisers that are trying to get them to do the right thing.


People want to piss and moan about things like inflation, but you should realize it is helpful for a smoother economy (in small doses. We just went through a very sever recession. And guess what, we are all here sitting in front of a computer, so things cannot be that bad for you.

People did get screwed but because Bush stepped up to the plate and listened to his economists we still have a banking sector and the system can be repaired. Everyone with money in stocks and is a baby boomer would have been fucked if he wouldn't have. And imagine the costs of having to care for all of them because they lost everything.

The idea of evil bankers and evil politicians is silly. That is not to say there are not some that are, but mostly they are just people doing a mediocre job. Luckily the system works.

Look at the standard of living over the last 80 years. We have gotten here through good hard work and smart economics. We have something special here, but to think that any one sector is ok to let have all the power is asinine.

If you give the power to the people, we will fall like any communist country will (because we will take and take), you give all the power to the government (because they will choke the free market), and we will fall like any fascist country will, and if you give it all to the businesses they will figure out a way to get all the money and collapse it and move on like any other commodity.

We need to have all three working against eachother with all of them looking out for their best interests, this way nobody can get too powerful. That I think we may be able to agree on. I just disagree on where we are at today with this balance. I understand the need of the FED and banking system very well, and to see all the tools dismantled because the price of a mineral is retarded. They keep the financial system afloat (even if it is not always smooth) so that the economy doesn't collapse. There is a reason why our standard of living continues to increase even though we have had what 6 recessions (2 with regan, 1 with bush sr, 2 with bush jr, not sure if clintons was technically a recession atm but lets just say it was) over the last 30 years. It is because of all of its flaws it is still one hell of a machine. And nobody is going to take that away from us anytime soon. And that is why the dollar will continue to be the place most invested by the world, which is why gold will have less demand once this panic starts to ease.




And question I have for you. You are basically saying that if we do a CPI and had gold in the basket, that if we did say buy a $20 gold eagle coin for $1300. While (not real numbers, more the equation you are getting at) in 1950 to buy one coin was $650 for that coin. It would be ($1300 - $650)/($650) to get the inflation rate right? (CPIt - CPIt-1)/(CPIt-1)

Well if that is the case we can do the same for anything, hell a gallon of milk, and say that everything has been inflated and only milks value is what matters.

Or do you have some sort of other equation that you are using. Feel free to get nerdy, I enjoy math.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
It does not matter how much gold cost between 1931 and 1973, you could NOT own it. You cannot sell what you don't have, therefore the price is irrelevant.

FWIW gold in 1950 was $35 per ounce just like it was in 1931 and in 1971 and all the years in between. Government (FDR) set that price when they confiscated it from their own citizens. After Nixon closed the gold window gold was still illegal to own, in 1973 the law was changed and people started buying gold again. The terrible economy we had in the late 70's caused gold to go to $850 in a short span of 6 years.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
It does not matter how much gold cost between 1931 and 1973, you could NOT own it. You cannot sell what you don't have, therefore the price is irrelevant.

FWIW gold in 1950 was $35 per ounce just like it was in 1931 and in 1971 and all the years in between. Government (FDR) set that price when they confiscated it from their own citizens. After Nixon closed the gold window gold was still illegal to own, in 1973 the law was changed and people started buying gold again. The terrible economy we had in the late 70's caused gold to go to $850 in a short span of 6 years.
Is it still illegal to own gold?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
What would happen if you owned a jewelry store? Or if you had gold teeth? I am not too familiar with this aside from some quick reading on this website and some others.

Were you able to hold any gold if you were a citizen? Why can we own gold now?

What if you were a miner?

What was the reasoning (explained not theorized by conspiracy theories) given on why this was happening, and was it reasonable?

Who had it confiscated from them that was an American? And was it a purchase of the gold the people owned or was it taken?

Could the lack of american demand be a reason why the price didn't move? How do you know it didn't move?

It seems to have moved in price according to this:



I just don't buy that something that has little real value to society has to be the only thing worth anything.

And if you please, could you also answer my question here:

And question I have for you. You are basically saying that if we do a CPI and had gold in the basket, that if we did say buy a $20 gold eagle coin for $1300. While (not real numbers, more the equation you are getting at) in 1950 to buy one coin was $650 for that coin. It would be ($1300 - $650)/($650) to get the inflation rate right? (CPIt - CPIt-1)/(CPIt-1)

Well if that is the case we can do the same for anything, hell a gallon of milk, and say that everything has been inflated and only milks value is what matters.

Or do you have some sort of other equation that you are using. Feel free to get nerdy, I enjoy math.
I am actually very interested in how you get to gold being the only measurement of value.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
What would happen if you owned a jewelry store? Or if you had gold teeth? I am not too familiar with this aside from some quick reading on this website and some others.

Were you able to hold any gold if you were a citizen? Why can we own gold now?

What if you were a miner?

What was the reasoning (explained not theorized by conspiracy theories) given on why this was happening, and was it reasonable?

Who had it confiscated from them that was an American? And was it a purchase of the gold the people owned or was it taken?

Could the lack of american demand be a reason why the price didn't move? How do you know it didn't move?

It seems to have moved in price according to this:

I just don't buy that something that has little real value to society has to be the only thing worth anything.

And if you please, could you also answer my question here:



I am actually very interested in how you get to gold being the only measurement of value.
Ill do my best here han to answer your questions.
First of all we need to determine what makes an item useful as money. For things to be used as money they need to have certain characteristics.

Durability-Any commodity that is to serve well as money should possess durability to a high degree. Otherwise it would wear quickly in its passage from hand to hand, and even deteriorate while in the possession of its owner. Consequently, perishable goods such as cattle, furs, tobacco, and even wheat and corn, have never proved satisfactory as mediums of exchange.

Portability-The commodity that serves as money must be moved from point to point, among the members of the society that uses it. Otherwise it is not money. This movement involves laborhttp://chestofbooks.com/finance/economics/Elementary-Economics/75-Foreign-Immigration-Immigration-And-Labor.html and expense. Hence, the commodity that combines greatest value in the smallest bulk, if we consider portability alone, is the most desirable as a medium of exchange.

Homogeneity- that is, the commodity from which it is made must be of the same quality wherever it is found. Obviously, cattle possess this characteristic to a very low degree, for scarcely any two of them are alike.

Divisibility- Is closely related to homogeneity, simply means the capability of a commodity to be divided without destroying its value. Here again, cattle do not possess this characteristic. Neither do furs or diamonds. Either loses value by being divided. The total value of the parts of a split diamond never equals the value of the original stone.


Of all the commodities known to mankind gold possesses in the highest degree the characteristics of good moneyhttp://chestofbooks.com/finance/economics/Elementary-Economics/Characteristics-Of-Gold.html#. Since the earliest time it has been desired for its own use as a commodity. Primitive man prized gold above all other metals. From it he made rings, chains, and other ornaments that appealed to his vanity. His descendants regard gold in much the same way. Gold is also scarce enough to make it highly valuable compared to its bulk, and yet it exists in large enough quantities to permit of its use in making exchangeshttp://chestofbooks.com/finance/economics/Elementary-Economics/Exchange.html. Finally, the value of gold is stable, though we must not get the mistaken idea, which some have, that it does not vary. The reason for its stability is that the supply of the metal coming from the mines, in any year let us say, is extremely small compared with the total supply in the possession of society.


Gold possesses also to a high degree the physical characteristics of a good money It is made durable by combining with the fine metal a small part of alloy. Gold wears well in coins, though it is best preserved by molding it in the form of bars. Also since it combines a relatively high value with small bulk, gold may be easily carried about. The homogeneity of gold is well known to every student of chemistry, who learns early in his course that it is a chemical element. All fine gold, therefore, is exactly alike, whether it be mined in South Africa or in Alaska. Gold is also divisible. No change in its shape or form affects its value. Two one-ounce pieces of gold are worth exactly as much as one two-ounce piece. Melting, rolling, or pounding has no effect whatever on the value of fine gold. Fifth, gold is the most difficult of all the metals to counterfeit. Any one accustomed to handle gold money can detect a spurious Gold Coin at a glance.


From the foregoing discussion of the qualities of a good money we can easily see why society has, by a long process of selection chosen gold as a standard. It could not have done otherwise. Whether or not gold will continue down to the end of time as the money standard, no one can say. I am reasonably sure that commodity will come only when that commodity shows its superiority to gold.





Acting under the authority of the Emergency Banking Relief Act, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order No. 6073. In addition to authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury to decide which of the nations' banks could open, the Order prohibited owners of gold from exporting or otherwise removing it from the United States. Shortly thereafter, also under the authority of the Emergency Banking Act, the President issued Executive Order No. 6102, which provided that all privately owned gold in the United States was to be confiscated by the government. As compensation, the owners would receive paper money.

in 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt dealt with a monetary and banking crisis by confiscating all privately owned gold; paying for the gold at $20.67 per ounce; immediately devaluing the dollar by 40 percent; and setting the price of gold at $35.00 per ounce. At a single stroke, Roosevelt increased the government's gold assets, stabilized the monetary system and increased wholesale prices by more than 33 percent. However, he also inflicted losses of 40 percent on gold owners and stripped them of the gold that they saved to insure their financial futures.

There were certain Caveats,
The President's gold confiscation order specifically exempted "gold coins having a recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins." The reason for the exception had nothing to do with sympathy for owners of numismatic gold coins, but rather with the provisions of the Constitution's Eminent Domain Clause. Twelve words provide the protective barrier: "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Since the confiscation of rare coins would be a taking of private property, just compensation would have to be paid.
When gold bullion was confiscated, the government had no difficulty asserting that payment in paper currency at the official gold price was just compensation. What had occurred was arguably a mere exchange of component parts of the monetary system, i.e. bullion for currency. But just compensation for rare gold coins –manifestly not part of the monetary system – would have been a very different situation. The government would have been forced to determine compensation on a coin-by-coin basis, an impossible administrative and logistical burden.




Order 6102 specifically exempted "customary use in industry, profession or art"--a provision that covered artists, jewelers, dentists, and sign makers among others. The order further permitted any person to own up to $100 in gold coins. So if you had 1000 double eagles, when the government was done with you , they let you keep 5 of those coins.

Now you may have figured out that only US citizens could not own gold, but Foreigners could still exchange each dollar for an equivalent amount of gold, and that is just what they did. Over the next 40 years various programs were used to stop the gold from leaving the country. With foreign governments exchanging their dollars for our gold if something wasn't done, there would be no gold left in the government coffers in which to back the currency. By the 1960's the gold reserves could no longer back each dollar but fractionally, President Eisenhower and Kennedy passed orders making it more difficult to get the gold out of the country, but France all of a sudden wanted to trade their 200 million dollars in for gold, if that had happened there would be almost no gold left in the USA. Nixon refused and closed the exchange forever. Since that day on the US dollar had only fiat value, its intrinsic value is near nothing.

Why did the price of gold stay the same price? because the government controlled the price and they only revalued it a few more times. By the time it was all said and done gold was worth $42 per ounce and the US still uses that price to value the gold in reserves. Since the price of gold was kept the same, all other items would now vary in price in relation to gold. Thats why your chart of housing shows a non linear price. The value of the homes was increasing or decreasing in relation to the fixed value of gold. It is still that way. think of the US dollar on one side of a teeter totter and gold being on the other side. It is a perfect correlation. When you see the USDX (Us Dollar index) go down, you will see a exact reverse correlation in the price of gold.

Now you explained that Alan Greenspan had alot to do with the economic downturn, and I agree.,but Greenspan also knew of the power of gold.
He gave a speech which i will Quote some and leave you a link for the rest.

"
[SIZE=-1]In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]protect savings from confiscation through inflation[/SIZE][SIZE=-1]. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. [/SIZE][SIZE=-1]The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves."[/SIZE]
http://www.usagold.com/gildedopinion/greenspan.html
How do you suppose Greenspan came to this conclusion?

When 1 foreign central bank pays another central bank what do they pay in? They don't use currencies they use GOLD. For the last century the Politicians and governments of this world have deceived all of us and made us believe that these pieces of paper really had value, but it is an ever decreasing value. They keep the gold and give us the paper, they know that paper aint worth shit, but gold is the standard by which EVERYTHING is priced against. of course they don't tell you that, they don't want you to know the secret.

How can you explain that a hershey bar in 1950 cost 5 cents, but now it costs $1. Did the candy bar become harder and harder to manufacture over the years? No, it has become a much much more efficient process. Did cocoa harvest decrease year after year? No they have increased every year. Did the sugar industry and the milk industry become much less efficient over the last 100 years? certainly not. So how is it that a candy bar has increased in price by 2000%? You don't see the price of a computer go up each year, they keep finding new ways to make them cheaper to produce, just Like the Hershey Company has found ways to make their candy bars cheaper to manufacture. So why the increase in price? Its simple really, the price hasn't increased, your dollar has lost value and it just takes more of them to purchase the same things...Inflation


Hopefully you get the idea.


Smilies :cuss::sleep::lol::wink: :dunce::bigjoint::!::finger: :sad::wall::?::fire: :sad::leaf::razz:
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I take it that was for a different post. Regardless, good to read to get a better idea of where you are coming from.

I still disagree for a few reasons:

1. Gold is not easy to transport. It is bulky and heavy, I really do not like the thought of having to carry all my currency in coins.

2. Unless we spent the money for the infrastructure to test metals in every shop it would be very difficult for most people to tell a counterfeit. Coins are easier to counterfeit than paper (test strips on large denominations) especially for vending machines (which how would we use vending machines/anything that uses coins atm). What if people shave some off of several hundred coins and remint it, unless we go back to scales that would be a mess.

Then how about people dillute the gold with other metals and restrike them. It would be easy to make a mold of a coin, we used to do it in art class in middle school.

3. Currency is just a representation of some value right? I mean if i work and make $25 then $25 represents one unit of time, it doesn't matter if it is .1 gram or worthless cheap paper currency right?

4. There would be a very big demand for gold if everyone is paid in it. When a currency doesn't change value (which I will continue to believe it doesn't unless you do the math that I had asked for to show me it quantifiably) then you will cause a recession, here check this out:

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/05/krugmans_baby-s.html (check out some of the responses to the criticism.

Correct me if I am wrong (saying your wrong doesn't count) but if we had a currency that does not devalue over time, you will have people storing their money and even keeping it in banks would be unpleasant due to the possibility of collapse, so it would make more sense to keep it buried in your back yard.

So then we would miss out on the beauty of financial intermediaries. The ability to have someone use the money in my bank account to finance their company expansion or some other way that my money would have better growth. The economy would suffer and stagnate. Financial innovations I would argue is what helped lead to the greatest expansion of technology we have seen over the last couple hundred years.

Imagine if Ford would not have been able to finance his company, how much longer would it have been if he could only sell something that he had to finance himself. Or microsoft not being able to get a loan to get onto the stock market because people not putting their money up.

Maybe I am dumping the anti banking/FED paronia on you, I am not sure atm if you are one of them or not. I kinda miss theBrutalTruth, he was very pro gold too.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I take it that was for a different post. Regardless, good to read to get a better idea of where you are coming from.

I still disagree for a few reasons:

1. Gold is not easy to transport. It is bulky and heavy, I really do not like the thought of having to carry all my currency in coins.

2. Unless we spent the money for the infrastructure to test metals in every shop it would be very difficult for most people to tell a counterfeit. Coins are easier to counterfeit than paper (test strips on large denominations) especially for vending machines (which how would we use vending machines/anything that uses coins atm). What if people shave some off of several hundred coins and remint it, unless we go back to scales that would be a mess.

Then how about people dillute the gold with other metals and restrike them. It would be easy to make a mold of a coin, we used to do it in art class in middle school.

3. Currency is just a representation of some value right? I mean if i work and make $25 then $25 represents one unit of time, it doesn't matter if it is .1 gram or worthless cheap paper currency right?

4. There would be a very big demand for gold if everyone is paid in it. When a currency doesn't change value (which I will continue to believe it doesn't unless you do the math that I had asked for to show me it quantifiably) then you will cause a recession, here check this out:

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/05/krugmans_baby-s.html (check out some of the responses to the criticism.

Correct me if I am wrong (saying your wrong doesn't count) but if we had a currency that does not devalue over time, you will have people storing their money and even keeping it in banks would be unpleasant due to the possibility of collapse, so it would make more sense to keep it buried in your back yard.

So then we would miss out on the beauty of financial intermediaries. The ability to have someone use the money in my bank account to finance their company expansion or some other way that my money would have better growth. The economy would suffer and stagnate. Financial innovations I would argue is what helped lead to the greatest expansion of technology we have seen over the last couple hundred years.

Imagine if Ford would not have been able to finance his company, how much longer would it have been if he could only sell something that he had to finance himself. Or microsoft not being able to get a loan to get onto the stock market because people not putting their money up.

Maybe I am dumping the anti banking/FED paronia on you, I am not sure atm if you are one of them or not. I kinda miss theBrutalTruth, he was very pro gold too.
Im not going to address all of your misunderstandings, you know how to read. Stop taking your professors teachings as gospel, they can and are very wrong very frequently. I will just touch on a couple of things. You CAN have paper money, it just must be convertible to Gold upon demand. We did it that way for 190 years, it has been proven to work. Basically you are trading gold warehouse receipts as cash just as was done 400 years ago.

When you deposit money into your bank, they in turn deposit your cash as a RESERVE upon which they can and do create money out of thin air to loan to someone else. The Entire world's banking system works on FRACTIONAL reserves. They don't actually lend YOUR money to anyone, your deposit lets them make a loan about 10 times larger than your deposit. Your deposit is sent to a holding area and it becomes part of the reserve required by law to be at least 10% in assets to loans. IE the bank has 1 million in reserve and 10 million in loans. this is the basis of our banking system, we let banks borrow money to us that doesn't even exist and we gladly pay them interest to do it. The banks are basically making money off of nothing. It has been this way since 1913. It has been this way for your entire life and you have no idea thats how it was done, because you and millions like you have been fooled into thinking that a piece of paper is as good as gold. If the government were to collapse the US dollar would be worth exactly NOTHING. It is government force that requires you to accept these pieces of paper in payment for your property and labor. Look into Legal tender laws, read all about it, then read on Fractional reserve banking..here this will get you started on your reeducation http://www.federalreserve.gov/ pay particular attention to "About the Fed" in it you will see I speak the truth.

GOLD is extremely hard to counterfeit, you only need some water and some math to easily figure out if it is real or not as gold is the ONLY metal with its specific gravity, tungsten comes close, but its EXTREMELY easy to tell the difference between tungsten and gold, even a 1 year old could make the distinction.

Now as far as mixing metals into coins and DEBASING their gold makeup has certainly been tried By many many governments in the past, it was called inflation then also because it did not take very long for the general population to figure out their coins were not what they used to be and you have an increase in prices. the increase in prices only comes after the government had spent all the money at face value. It works the same way today.This is all easily verified by taking a good look at history, which makes me think that you did not like history at all hence your change to economics.
The US government debased almost all of its coinage in 1965, quarters, fifty cent pieces, dimes and dollars were all made of 90% silver from the dawn of the USA until 1964. Now its all nickle plated copper. In 1982 the US penny went from 99% copper content to 99% zinc content. a 1981 penny in metal value is worth 3 cents. Of course the Government has made the melting of its coins illegal. DUH!

There was a period in our countries history when you could go mine your gold and bring it to the treasury after assaying and have your gold minted into US coins at no charge to you.
If you had a currency that did not devalue over time you would still have deposits in banks, banks do provide a modicum of interest, PLUS the safety of a vault and security systems, which your mattress does not. Just because we used gold does not mean banks cannot make loans. They would just be loaning yours and mine to make the loan, not make the money by creating some numbers in an account and calling it good and using the deposit as the reserve.

We once had a President who stood up the Federal Reserve and had congress issue silver certificates that could be brought to the US treasury and traded for the same amount of value in silver. Can you name the president who did this? What happened to those certificates and what was the reason behind issuing them in the first place?

Gold is pretty easy to transport, If I wanted to buy a house for $100K, I would need to bring approx 90 TROY ounces of gold which is about 12-13 troy ounces to the pound. So with about 8 pounds of metal I can buy a house. not really that hard to transport. Back in 1910 you could buy a nice tailored suit, tie, and shoes and belt for about 1 gold double eagle, and today you can buy pretty much the same thing for 1 ounce of gold. But now people would be using the paper receits most likely and so therefore things really wouldn't be any different than they are now.

The biggest reason we should use gold and silver in payments of debts? The US constitution only allows for the use of gold and silver, but hey that thing is just a piece of paper made by a bunch of old men who knew nothing of tyranny nor economics right?

FYI there is not exactly 1 ounce of gold in a US double Eagle, there is actually only 90% gold in a Eagle, the rest is silver.

Also the greatest period of growth in the USA bar none was during the gold era.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Stop taking your professors teachings as gospel, they can and are very wrong very frequently.
I would like for you to know that I have not taken anything as gospel my entire life, I had a problem early on with this, and the only real difference between then and now is that I know when to shut up so that it doesn't control my livelihood.

When you deposit money into your bank, they in turn deposit your cash as a RESERVE upon which they can and do create money out of thin air to loan to someone else. The Entire world's banking system works on FRACTIONAL reserves. They don't actually lend YOUR money to anyone, your deposit lets them make a loan about 10 times larger than your deposit. Your deposit is sent to a holding area and it becomes part of the reserve required by law to be at least 10% in assets to loans. IE the bank has 1 million in reserve and 10 million in loans. this is the basis of our banking system, we let banks borrow money to us that doesn't even exist and we gladly pay them interest to do it.
This is not really the case, again correct me if I am wrong, but they don't create 10 million if I deposit 1 million out of thin air.

What happens is that they have 10 million of other peoples deposits, but are forced to carry 10% in RR (required reserves). That will allow them to make a loan for 9.09 million, without my deposit.

So with my deposit they can now make an additional $909,000 loan.

This is important, unless they have changed this somewhat recently because it is not money from nothing, it is real currency that they are loaning.



Just glanced at the fractional reserve requirement and I am pretty positive I am correct.

What happens (and why the Fed is important) is that they are forced to hold a certain amount of their assets (10% in our example) as a way to stop unlimited growth of money. If there was not a fraction kept out it would continue to inflate it without bound. So all your basis is off because of this simple mistake (again if I am wrong correct me because this is pivotal) your reasoning falls apart.

It has been this way for your entire life and you have no idea thats how it was done, because you and millions like you have been fooled into thinking that a piece of paper is as good as gold.
Funny enough I have known this for years, and it has nothing to do with school. If I work a forty hour workweek and take those dollars to the grocery store, I can buy food with it, and have plenty left to pay for the other things in life. If I take gold to the same place, they would not accept it would they? Therefore in our society gold is not considered currency. Because it cannot freely be traded for goods.

GOLD is extremely hard to counterfeit, you only need some water and some math to easily figure out if it is real or not as gold is the ONLY metal with its specific gravity, tungsten comes close, but its EXTREMELY easy to tell the difference between tungsten and gold, even a 1 year old could make the distinction.
Awesome, so now we just need to get everyone working at McDonalds to learn how to find the specific displacement of gold and do calculations based on that.

But using paper money that is tied to gold is fine too, but to think that people would not be fooled is not reality. People would not be able to tell a coin that is plated in gold vs one that is not without testing it somehow.

Now as far as mixing metals into coins and DEBASING their gold makeup has certainly been tried By many many governments in the past, it was called inflation then also because it did not take very long for the general population to figure out their coins were not what they used to be and you have an increase in prices. the increase in prices only comes after the government had spent all the money at face value. It works the same way today.This is all easily verified by taking a good look at history, which makes me think that you did not like history at all hence your change to economics.
The biggest reason I switched from history is that it is a soft science, we will never get the full actual history of a situation, so most of it is based off of educated guesswork, which is fun and exciting, but doesn't actually help you to get paid in the real world. Mathematics is the opposite, You are figuring out the most accurate way to measure things with math, anything.

That is why I had asked you to explain how you got to gold being the only 'real money'. Because I can mathematically show you other things that maintain the same value in regards to everything else changing in value, and that you are able to just buy the same amount of it, but everything else has changed its value according to that one item.

Can you prove that gold is the only thing that will do this?



This is the biggest problem I have with the gold only theory. It is really just like organized religion.
Everytime I have seen this, people will show some history of gold and show how it is the only thing that can exist, and refuse to bend that other things could do the same thing as it. I can agree that gold can be the currency, and have zero issue with it (as long as I can keep bills (I hate coins)), because it meets the requirements for the role of money, but to say it is the only thing is dogma unless you can prove otherwise.

The biggest reason we should use gold and silver in payments of debts? The US constitution only allows for the use of gold and silver, but hey that thing is just a piece of paper made by a bunch of old men who knew nothing of tyranny nor economics right?

FYI there is not exactly 1 ounce of gold in a US double Eagle, there is actually only 90% gold in a Eagle, the rest is silver.

Also the greatest period of growth in the USA bar none was during the gold era.
Maybe because they went from being mostly a trade based nation to a mature economy? Before this most americans were substanence farmers and a lot of trade took place off the books, once there was measures of account and reason for the government to track closer the trade traffic those measures became more accurate, and far larger.

It also helps that this was during the industrial revolution, so there was so many things that entered into the equation, that trying to put the reasoning on gold is a far stretch.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
This is not really the case, again correct me if I am wrong, but they don't create 10 million if I deposit 1 million out of thin air.

What happens is that they have 10 million of other peoples deposits, but are forced to carry 10% in RR (required reserves). That will allow them to make a loan for 9.09 million, without my deposit.

So with my deposit they can now make an additional $909,000 loan.

This is important, unless they have changed this somewhat recently because it is not money from nothing, it is real currency that they are loaning.



Just glanced at the fractional reserve requirement and I am pretty positive I am correct.

What happens (and why the Fed is important) is that they are forced to hold a certain amount of their assets (10% in our example) as a way to stop unlimited growth of money. If there was not a fraction kept out it would continue to inflate it without bound. So all your basis is off because of this simple mistake (again if I am wrong correct me because this is pivotal) your reasoning falls apart.
I started to do the math of this difference. And I can see why you are freaked out if I thought that it was a deposit would allow a bank to make a loan that used it as a 10% reserve requirement. Meaning that a $10,000 savings deposit would allow the bank to make a $100,000 loan.

Because if so when they use that money (like to buy a house) and the next bank receives those funds in form of a deposit, it would allow them to in turn give out a $1,000,000 loan, and the next bank could loan $10,000,000, on and on forever.

There is 100% no way that this is possible, so I refuse to believe it without irrefutable proof (like the law shown on a .gov).

And this basis for economic thought would prove that if this is your basis for how gold is the only measure of value, I would think that it is very very flawed.
 
Top