Justified?

[UncleBuck]

did the border patrol agent get away with it? can I get away with it? i'll start tomorrow.

my opinion kills you.

so you are giving up your dream of sniping illegals without giving them their day in court because you fear some silly jail time? sounds like you like to talk the talk, but can't walk the walk

your opinion, one that many others have expressed, does nothing but invoke wonder: when did we forget that Americans hold themselves to a higher standard? we do not torture and everyone gets a trial....sadly, i fear these things are becoming a thing of the past. moreso when i see opinions like the ones youe express then stand behind

 

[fdd2blk]

so you are giving up your dream of sniping illegals without giving them their day in court because you fear some silly jail time? sounds like you like to talk the talk, but can't walk the walk

your opinion, one that many others have expressed, does nothing but invoke wonder: when did we forget that Americans hold themselves to a higher standard? we do not torture and everyone gets a trial....sadly, i fear these things are becoming a thing of the past. moreso when i see opinions like the ones youe express then stand behind

citizens get fair trials. illegals get shot.

it already happened. you can make up scenarios of what you expect of me, meanwhile, people are dying on the border.

 

[Keenly2]

It seems your not very smart or something. as I already stated its not about the neg rep. its the fact that it was done without leaving a name and it was done just because they didn't agree with what I said not because I broke any rules. learn how to read retard.

and if I cared that much about neg rep you idiot why would I be leaving this post that will obviously bring more neg rep from the same coward?

you keep breaking those forum rules and ill keep laughing at you cause some one disagreed with you over the internet

win win


to be perfectly honest, its not that hard to obtain legitimate status, at the same time i could imagine its pretty hard to get by in this country without knowing how to speak english

 

[UncleBuck]

citizens get fair trials. illegals get shot.

it already happened. you can make up scenarios of what you expect of me, meanwhile, people are dying on the border.

i do not disagree with the kid getting shot, the dumbass threw rocks at a BP...i'd hope for a lesser result but what happened.... happened.

what i disagree with is that the 'solution to the illegal problem' sounds a lot like the 'solution to the jewish problem' according to you and many others....the whole invade/kill/vigilante line of thought. it is frightening.

for your edification, illegals still DO get trials. they often get to stay despite their illegality. you seem to use google extensively, surely you have seen this. they do not 'get shot'. this is not iran

in any case, this thread has been FUBAR sidetracked. we know where we each stand, let's move on or let this thread die.

 

[fdd2blk]

i do not disagree with the kid getting shot, the dumbass threw rocks at a BP...i'd hope for a lesser result but what happened.... happened.

what i disagree with is that the 'solution to the illegal problem' sounds a lot like the 'solution to the jewish problem' according to you and many others....the whole invade/kill/vigilante line of thought. it is frightening.

for your edification, illegals still DO get trials. they often get to stay despite their illegality. you seem to use google extensively, surely you have seen this. they do not 'get shot'. this is not iran

in any case, this thread has been FUBAR sidetracked. we know where we each stand, let's move on or let this thread die.

i never said "invade" and i don't really need google to have feelings.

don't tell me what to do. i'll stay and rave all day if i want to.

yes, this just like the jews.
can we kill a million or 2 of them now?


this thread is NOT sidetracked at all. dude threw a rock at an armed GUARD and got himself killed. not really much more to it.

 

[amquai]

I agree with fdd.

its so easy for these illegals to cross the border what is stopping some terrorist bringing a nuclear bomb into our country and detonating it and then slip right back to mexico? We need to have tougher penalties to those that decide to break our laws and enter our country illegally as well as a better plan in place to prevent them from doing so. its a war we are fighting at the border. a war against drugs, child prostitution, human smuggling etc. etc. etc. we need to treat it as such and In wars people get shot.

 

[tinyTURTLE]

I agree with fdd.

its so easy for these illegals to cross the border what is stopping some terrorist bringing a nuclear bomb into our country and detonating it and then slip right back to mexico? We need to have tougher penalties to those that decide to break our laws and enter our country illegally as well as a better plan in place to prevent them from doing so. its a war we are fighting at the border. a war against drugs, child prostitution, human smuggling etc. etc. etc. we need to treat it as such and In wars people get shot.

as long as they detonate it in texas and go right back.

 

[GreatwhiteNorth]

Well folks, here's an update on the story.
Sounds like junior was pretty well known to LEO's and the BP.

APNewsBreak: Mexican boy killed by Border Patrol agents was among most wanted teen smugglers


Published June 25, 2010

EL PASO, Texas (AP) — Federal records show that a 15-year-old Mexican boy shot and killed by U.S. Border Patrol agents was among El Paso's most wanted juvenile smugglers.
According to federal arrest records reviewed by The Associated Press, Sergio Adrian Hernandez Huereka had been arrested at least four times since 2008 and twice in the same week in February 2009.
A Border Patrol agent shot and killed the teen on June 7 while trying to arrest illegal immigrants crossing the muddy bed of the Rio Grande. Some witnesses said a group of people on the Mexican side were throwing rocks at the agents. Agents are permitted to use lethal force against rock throwers.

 

[UncleBuck]

i never said "invade" and i don't really need google to have feelings.

don't tell me what to do. i'll stay and rave all day if i want to.

yes, this just like the jews.
can we kill a million or 2 of them now?


this thread is NOT sidetracked at all. dude threw a rock at an armed GUARD and got himself killed. not really much more to it.

you have proposed invasion in other threads or this one.

feel free to rave all day. don't mind me when i come along and point out the logical consequences of your extremism.

we did get kinda sidetracked from the main issue when we started talking about your 'final solutions'...kill 'em all

eh, whatever.

 

[UncleBuck]

Well folks, here's an update on the story.
Sounds like junior was pretty well known to LEO's and the BP.

APNewsBreak: Mexican boy killed by Border Patrol agents was among most wanted teen smugglers


Published June 25, 2010

EL PASO, Texas (AP) — Federal records show that a 15-year-old Mexican boy shot and killed by U.S. Border Patrol agents was among El Paso's most wanted juvenile smugglers.
According to federal arrest records reviewed by The Associated Press, Sergio Adrian Hernandez Huereka had been arrested at least four times since 2008 and twice in the same week in February 2009.
A Border Patrol agent shot and killed the teen on June 7 while trying to arrest illegal immigrants crossing the muddy bed of the Rio Grande. Some witnesses said a group of people on the Mexican side were throwing rocks at the agents. Agents are permitted to use lethal force against rock throwers.

i have pointed out before that this kid's criminal history is irrelevant, unless of course the BP had some super ESP and knew about all these offenses in those moments he chose to fire. it has no bearing on the 'justified or not?' question, whatsoever. besides, this is fairly old news

 

[UncleBuck]

as long as they detonate it in texas and go right back.

Dear God,

Please make this scenario come true. If you do, I will stop masturbating and torturing kittens.

The End.

Love,

Me

 

[fdd2blk]

you have proposed invasion in other threads or this one.

feel free to rave all day. don't mind me when i come along and point out the logical consequences of your extremism.

we did get kinda sidetracked from the main issue when we started talking about your 'final solutions'...kill 'em all

eh, whatever.

now you're just making shit up.

none of this means anything. there is NO argument here.

"Agents are permitted to use lethal force against rock throwers."

end of subject.

 

[UncleBuck]

find me 6 million plus that are not criminals...you have no evidence,,what have you seen? nothing..your talking out your ass,,,again..keep your scoops of bullshit..your not always right..and you really have no idea wtf your talking about..come to my neck of the woods and let myself and my mexican gangster neighbors enlighten you..you really are ignorant.

Jan Brewer tried to make a similar assertion to yours:

"The majority of them in my opinion and I think in the opinion of law enforcement is that they are not coming here to work. They are coming here and they’re bringing drugs. And they’re doing drop houses and they’re extorting people and they’re terrorizing the families."

she had to promptly correct herself because....IT IS NOT TRUE.

this should be the end of this particular sub-debate

 

[GreatwhiteNorth]

i have pointed out before that this kid's criminal history is irrelevant, unless of course the BP had some super ESP and knew about all these offenses in those moments he chose to fire. it has no bearing on the 'justified or not?' question, whatsoever. besides, this is fairly old news

Crap, I didn't realize YOU were the one that pointed it out, but then again perhaps it is relevant - is it possible that BP has some knowledge of such a young and infamous individual since he "was among El Paso's most wanted juvenile smugglers"?

 

[fdd2blk]

"Agents are permitted to use lethal force against rock throwers."

 

[Smile at someone today]

"Still say post signs trespassers will be shot"
But the USA will never do that the people in charge are to worried about polls.
Look around the world people are fair, fair more radical about illegal immigrants then the USA is,and in most places they don't have to worry about being killed by these savages

 

[UncleBuck]

Crap, I didn't realize YOU were the one that pointed it out, but then again perhaps it is relevant - is it possible that BP has some knowledge of such a young and infamous individual since he "was among El Paso's most wanted juvenile smugglers"?

alright, suppose they did recognize him in the chaos and from a distance. i will grant that.

now assuming they recognized him, does that make it OK for them to shoot to kill for that alone without his day in court? last time i checked, even illegals get trials. it is part of the silly 'innocent until proven guilty' principle american believe in. we don't simply drag suspected criminals behind the court house to shoot them, no matter how damning the evidence.

so still irrelevant.

 

[GreatwhiteNorth]

alright, suppose they did recognize him in the chaos and from a distance. i will grant that.

now assuming they recognized him, does that make it OK for them to shoot to kill for that alone without his day in court? last time i checked, even illegals get trials. it is part of the silly 'innocent until proven guilty' principle american believe in. we don't simply drag suspected criminals behind the court house to shoot them, no matter how damning the evidence.

so still irrelevant.

You have your opinion and I have mine, so shall we agree to disagree?

Then again there is this: Justified; to prove or show to be just, right, or reasonable b (1) : to show to have had a sufficient legal reason.
Since we have sufficiently ascertained that the BP agent acted within the law (yes?), he was justified in that he had sufficient legal reason in shooting said individual.
Case closed.

 

[UncleBuck]

i'll take it that by switching the conversation back to justifiability, you concede his prior deeds are irrelevant to the question of justifiability.

 

[Smile at someone today]

i'll take it that by switching the conversation back to justifiability, you concede his prior deeds are irrelevant to the question of justifiability.

well im done here and i think he is also ... your here to type and he chose to prove his case instead of using "Google facts"

-Peace