Why Is The Bible So Revered As The "Word of GOD"?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Leothwyn

Leothwyn

Well-Known Member
This post is perfect... Heisenberg basically points out that BrotherBuz isn't capable of having a real debate, and that he doesn't seem to be able (or willing) to respond directly to other peoples points. So, BrotherBuz quotes him, and responds with...... a rant about gays. :lol::lol: Hilarious.


BrotherBuz said:
Sir, I understand you better now; you’re the same dude that found it odd that anyone, would hate the act of homosexuality. You’re found on p.42, (people knocking on your door), right below this thread, trying to convenience a young man that homosexual acts are considered normal and shouldn‘t make him feel repulsed.

As I said before, no one should explain to another, why homosexuality is a creepy thought. You should already know that!!

Listen carefully "deviant", just because Klosetman, Padawanbater and yourself find it okay or normal for a man to stick his penis in another man’s ass doesn’t mean that most condone this act or find it okay. Most find it sickening.
So, there you go, you Klosetman and Padwanbater are in the wrong thread!!
Click to expand...
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Ok, Im finally gonna give in and admit you cant argue with an idiot, so I aint gonna try argue with BB anymore.

Its like trying to teach a dog to play piano, he'll just sit there and bark.

Sad thing is, he probably thinks he won...
ROFLCOPTER@BB
 
KlosetKing

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
BrotherBuz said:
^^^context: This is Klosetman talking to Heisenberg.
I'm sorry, but I just can't resist LOL . . . This has to be the funniest shit on the net.
Click to expand...
Keep trying buddy, but we have showed you that your petty religion will no longer divide 'us'. How long will you let it isolate you from rational discussion and logical thinking?

Oh wait, you've been trained to NOT want that. I forgot.
 
BrotherBuz

BrotherBuz

Active Member
KlosetKing said:
Keep trying buddy,but we have showed you that your petty religion will no longer divide 'us'.
Click to expand...
Heisenberg said:
And so when the thread gets no attention he struggles and casts his lure over and over until sure enough he gets more bites. KK can't seem to resist the bait and allows the griefer to successfully reel in his catch.
Click to expand...
Sounds like your already divided. Time to move in for the Kill. See what happens when a boy wonders into the Lyons' Den.
 
ChubbySoap

ChubbySoap

Well-Known Member
...and a lovely romanesque stainless steel flatware making company....

perhaps he meant them....pretty mean cold meat fork they make...
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
And you never know when you could need a high quality cold meat fork...better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it!

EDIT: Nice plant in your avatar KlosetKing by the way, it smoke up nice?
 
BrotherBuz

BrotherBuz

Active Member
Klosetking-

If homosexuality is so benevolent, gay and normal, why is it that they can't procreate?

Please, no smoke & mirrors.
 
Heisenberg

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
BrotherBuz said:
Klosetking-

If homosexuality is so benevolent, gay and normal, why is it that they can't procreate?

Please, no smoke & mirrors.
Click to expand...
Someone only has to think about this question for 10 seconds to see the error contained within. This is both a flawed premise and a flawed conclusion. What we have here is another statement that has had enough thought put into it to cause emotion, but not enough thought to determine if the question is valid.

After 10 seconds thought it should occur to someone, homosexuals are able to procreate.

After 20 seconds thought it should occur to someone that if we condemn acts which do not lead to procreation, then we must include, masturbation, oral sex, condom use, pulling out, ect.

So following his own logic, either BB is a virgin who's never masturbated or else his sexual encounters have always led to pregnancy...or hes a hypocrite.

If BB puts less than 10 seconds thought into his own posts, how much time do you think he spends on others? This sort of critical thought, the act of thinking the idea through and exploring it's implications, is what BB calls smoke and mirrors; dodging.

BB's posts can have some value. He does a great job of demonstrating logical fallacies. It's been pointed out how he uses ad hominem attacks and red herrings. I wonder, can anyone pick out a much more subtle form of ad hominem attack called 'poisoning the well'?

Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a logical fallacy where adverse information about a target is pre-emptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say.

Hes used it many times but perhaps it is too boring to go back and find it. No worries, I am sure he will commit this and other fallacies in future posts since he can't seem to understand why fallacies are invalid. Perhaps when this thread is finished it can be printed out and used for a critical thinking class. (I know mine could have used new material)

As I said, debating him is useless, but perhaps we can use the opportunity to actually teach some people about critical thinking. The beauty is, we don't actually have to respond directly to him and yet the fallacies will still keep coming.
 
karri0n

karri0n

Well-Known Member
Heisenberg said:
Someone only has to think about this question for 10 seconds to see the error contained within. What we have here is another statement that has had enough thought put into it to cause emotion, but not enough thought to determine if the question is valid.

After 10 seconds thought it should occur to someone, homosexuals are able to procreate.

After 20 seconds thought it should occur to someone that if we condemn acts which do not lead to procreation, then we must include, masturbation, oral sex, condom use, pulling out, ect.
So either BB is a virgin or else his sexual encounters have always led to pregnancy...or hes a hypocrite.

If BB puts less than 10 seconds thought into his own posts, how much time do you think he spends on others? This sort of critical thought, the act of thinking the idea through and exploring it's implications, is what BB calls smoke and mirrors; dodging.

BB's posts can have some value. He does a great job of demonstrating logical fallacies. It's been pointed out how he uses ad hominem attacks and red herrings. I wonder, can anyone pick out a much more subtle form of ad hominem attack called 'poisoning the well'?

Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a logical fallacy where adverse information about a target is pre-emptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say.

Hes used it many times but perhaps it is too boring to go back and find it. No worries, I am sure he will commit this and other fallacies in future posts since he can't seem to understand why fallacies are invalid. Perhaps when this thread is finished it can be printed out and used for a critical thinking class. (I know mine could have used new material)
Click to expand...
I just don't like the whole 1-2 sentences, double spacing thing....
 
KlosetKing

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
EDIT: Nice plant in your avatar KlosetKing by the way, it smoke up nice?
Click to expand...
Well due to some late stress, it actually ended up hermy'ing, but aside from that, ya it turned out pretty chron =D

Heisenberg said:
Someone only has to think about this question for 10 seconds to see the error contained within. This is both a flawed premise and a flawed conclusion. What we have here is another statement that has had enough thought put into it to cause emotion, but not enough thought to determine if the question is valid.

After 10 seconds thought it should occur to someone, homosexuals are able to procreate.

After 20 seconds thought it should occur to someone that if we condemn acts which do not lead to procreation, then we must include, masturbation, oral sex, condom use, pulling out, ect.

So following his own logic, either BB is a virgin who's never masturbated or else his sexual encounters have always led to pregnancy...or hes a hypocrite.

If BB puts less than 10 seconds thought into his own posts, how much time do you think he spends on others? This sort of critical thought, the act of thinking the idea through and exploring it's implications, is what BB calls smoke and mirrors; dodging.

BB's posts can have some value. He does a great job of demonstrating logical fallacies. It's been pointed out how he uses ad hominem attacks and red herrings. I wonder, can anyone pick out a much more subtle form of ad hominem attack called 'poisoning the well'?

Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a logical fallacy where adverse information about a target is pre-emptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say.

Hes used it many times but perhaps it is too boring to go back and find it. No worries, I am sure he will commit this and other fallacies in future posts since he can't seem to understand why fallacies are invalid. Perhaps when this thread is finished it can be printed out and used for a critical thinking class. (I know mine could have used new material)

As I said, debating him is useless, but perhaps we can use the opportunity to actually teach some people about critical thinking. The beauty is, we don't actually have to respond directly to him and yet the fallacies will still keep coming.
Click to expand...
Couldn't have said it better myself. Going back over the thread, it becomes obvious that what little support he has had has come and gone very quickly, while others have stuck around to watch him dig deeper into the hole.

I feel we 'all' have learned a little something from this, if only at the very least honing conversation skills. Your point about his posts being designed strictly to arise emotion is 100% on as well, its just too bad he hasn't realized that he hasn't stirred any emotion for quite sometime now, and there are very little rises left to get out of people.

Also, this can be a learning experience for other religious type, to possible open their mind a bit. Realize that 'his' style of thinking only makes you look foolish, and lashing out with no purpose other than to anger and upset others, does not further your cause. Speak softly, think thoroughly, and remember that it is 'just debate'. Not one person here expects to 'convince' anyone else of anything (aside from maybe BB), its more about providing intelligent discussion.

karri0n said:
I just don't like the whole 1-2 sentences, double spacing thing....
Click to expand...
Well, imo, would you rather some split up, easily readable sentences? Or one giant block of text that's almost unreadable? Ill take the split sentences, thank you =D (oh and its single spaced btw)
 
Heisenberg

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
Ever wonder about his frequent use of the term 'smoke and mirrors'? I think it's because when he tries to hold in his mind a logical conclusion which conflicts with his beliefs his mind gets all cloudy and starts reflecting back to him the ideas which brought him comfort in the past. He interprets this as smoke and mirrors; better known as cognitive disequilibriume.

A critical thinking mind tends to relieve cognitive dissonance by changing attitude, beliefs, and actions. A self-centered mind tends to handle dissonance by justifying, blaming, and denying/ignoring. It's clear to see which group BB falls into.

When we strive to understand why some people hold and defend erroneousness conclusions, understanding cognitive dissonance can help a lot. Next time your mind experiences cognitive dissonance pay attention to the way you resolve it.
 
mccumcumber

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
If homosexuality is so benevolent, gay and normal, why is it that they can't procreate?

Please, no smoke & mirrors.
Click to expand...
You still haven't answered why priests, the holy ones of religion, seem to be homosexual pedophiles.

Also, not being able to procreate is a very good thing in our day and age. Have you noticed how overpopulated the world is? Stephen Hawking predicted that we'd run out of resources in the next 50 years to support the amount of people we have! Funny enough, Newton predicted, by studying the bible, that the world would end some time around 2050...
 
ChronicObsession

ChronicObsession

Well-Known Member
Homosexuality defined in 3 simple sentences. Butt encounters Penis. Penis Make Camp inside of Butt's Anus. Penis takes a shower with soap.:lol: So... From which orifice does the baby come out of? Well, that question just doesn't make any sense, does it? Hehe... guide your penis into... a vagina !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top