bob harris
Well-Known Member
The Michigan law certainly needs clarification. The question is: Whats fair and responsible?
1) Getting your certification
Currently anyone can get certified. Just go to your local profiteering Dr. hand over your cash and tell him about the severe and chronic pain you have in your knee from falling off your bike as a toddler...of course you've got no medical records..but that's ok..The certification process needs to be legitimized. Real conditions need to be established....you can't go to a real Dr, give him the same story and get Oxycontin..
2) Growers
The person growing for themselves should be left alone, for the most part. Care givers on the other hand should be monitored. I'm not talking about distribution here, rather quality control.
Testing of the cannabis should be required. Not only thc/cbd/cbn levels, but mold, parasites, pesticides should all be checked for prior to distribution. It's medicine, not moonshine. If people growing for their own use want to supply their overages to other..same thing applies, it should be tested.
3) Distribution
Care givers need to be held responsible for "overages".. The vast majority of people seeking care giver status simply want to profit on the overages created. Come on now..if youv'e got 5 people on your card, and have 60 plants going...tell me with a straight face you don't have significant overages. No way possible that 5 people can use the product of that many plants.
I'm not saying that a profit shouldn't be made for the effort...I'm simply saying that records need to be kept..taxes need to be paid..it should be treated like any other business.
The 12 plant limit was established with the patient that grows their own in mind. It allows for less than ideal growing conditions of a small grow room..plants in different stages of life for a continual supply, and loss due to disease, pests and other maladies that can affect a crop.
When someone steps to the plate and invests the money to grow 60 plants..a lot of those variables are reduced or eliminated. All of a sudden proper lighting, atmospheric controls, nutrient schedule are all improved (hopefully) and the crops and yields are larger.
4) distribution..part 2
Dispensaries, commissaries, 'cafe's"...all need to be addressed. I'm not opposed to some form of dispensary distribution. For those that can't grow their own, there shold be a "pharmacy" resource.
But could we have a little professionalism please? Cafe's are ridiculous. That's just wanting to open a "bar' for cannabis....Dispensaries should be held to a professional standard. Certified testing of the product sold..low key, professional environment, maybe even someone behind the counter that understands THC/CBD/CBN values, and how they affect the type of treatment you can expect from a given strain. A heavy indica for pain relief is a whole lot different than sativa you would want for movement disorders.
Just my thoughts...
1) Getting your certification
Currently anyone can get certified. Just go to your local profiteering Dr. hand over your cash and tell him about the severe and chronic pain you have in your knee from falling off your bike as a toddler...of course you've got no medical records..but that's ok..The certification process needs to be legitimized. Real conditions need to be established....you can't go to a real Dr, give him the same story and get Oxycontin..
2) Growers
The person growing for themselves should be left alone, for the most part. Care givers on the other hand should be monitored. I'm not talking about distribution here, rather quality control.
Testing of the cannabis should be required. Not only thc/cbd/cbn levels, but mold, parasites, pesticides should all be checked for prior to distribution. It's medicine, not moonshine. If people growing for their own use want to supply their overages to other..same thing applies, it should be tested.
3) Distribution
Care givers need to be held responsible for "overages".. The vast majority of people seeking care giver status simply want to profit on the overages created. Come on now..if youv'e got 5 people on your card, and have 60 plants going...tell me with a straight face you don't have significant overages. No way possible that 5 people can use the product of that many plants.
I'm not saying that a profit shouldn't be made for the effort...I'm simply saying that records need to be kept..taxes need to be paid..it should be treated like any other business.
The 12 plant limit was established with the patient that grows their own in mind. It allows for less than ideal growing conditions of a small grow room..plants in different stages of life for a continual supply, and loss due to disease, pests and other maladies that can affect a crop.
When someone steps to the plate and invests the money to grow 60 plants..a lot of those variables are reduced or eliminated. All of a sudden proper lighting, atmospheric controls, nutrient schedule are all improved (hopefully) and the crops and yields are larger.
4) distribution..part 2
Dispensaries, commissaries, 'cafe's"...all need to be addressed. I'm not opposed to some form of dispensary distribution. For those that can't grow their own, there shold be a "pharmacy" resource.
But could we have a little professionalism please? Cafe's are ridiculous. That's just wanting to open a "bar' for cannabis....Dispensaries should be held to a professional standard. Certified testing of the product sold..low key, professional environment, maybe even someone behind the counter that understands THC/CBD/CBN values, and how they affect the type of treatment you can expect from a given strain. A heavy indica for pain relief is a whole lot different than sativa you would want for movement disorders.
Just my thoughts...