How to tell if a picture is fake or photoshopped?

ScoobyDoobyDoo

ScoobyDoobyDoo

Well-Known Member
homebrewer said:
When you have things dialed in, there are no surprises. You're exactly right in that my plants are the same each and every friggen time, that's the goal dude.

Here we go again, just a different thread. I'm still waiting on those pics Phil. Get off the internet for twenty minutes and snap some pics. You know, I'm beginning to think you've got jack and squat growing right now, hence your inability to pull yourself away from your masturbatorium.

The pics from my camera are too big to upload anywhere. I need to import them into paint, then 'save as' which resizes the pic to near 1MB. Again, I don't doctor my pics, there is really no need.
Click to expand...
please fill out this form and submit it for review.

butthurtform.jpg
 
DelSlow

DelSlow

Well-Known Member
ScoobyDoobyDoo said:
just seems weird to me that those first pics look exactly the same as the ones you posted in the "after trying dyna grow..." thread in the nutrients section. then the wide angle shots of your plants are always taken from the exact same angle and your plants and room always look the exact same. never any changes, plants always the same height and color, never anything different about the room. just looks suspicious to me. that coupled with the fact that any thread that comes up about AN you just drop in it and start talking shit. but you never go into experienced growers threads and try ot convince them to use Dyna. only the newbs using it. you talk up a big game to make them think you know what you're talking about but after we proved you were lying you got all butthurt. dyna isn't that much cheaper than sensi and we ran the ppm tests on dyna, sensi, and connoisseur and it was so clear how false your statements were about dyna being 85% more concentrated than AN.

then you are caught in a thread bashing pics from my last harvest as if they weren't quality. ironically the same person you compliment earlier in the thread as being an experienced grower with lots of knowledge who knows what he is talking about actually +reps me for the pics and posts that the plants were truly beautiful. also, i found it weird that not 1 person in that thread agreed with you. they all said the plants were grown to perfection. seems like an whole lot of hating on your part. that coupled with you constantly shilling for dyna just has me curious as to your motives.
Click to expand...
Don't take the internet too seriously, nuglets ;)
 
Total Head

Total Head

Well-Known Member
for the record, i went to that pskiller site and uploaded pictures straight off a sony memory stick and every single one said "saturation adjusted". i have never adjusted any of the photos, not even to crop out the datestamp. for what purpose would i adjust the saturation on a picture of a joint?




i also uploaded the pic directly off the memory stick. i'd love for someone to explain how this picture was adjusted. i own absolutely no picture editing software except for whatever comes with windows photo viewer, and i only use that for cropping (which this picture is not).

edit: i just went and snapped an experimental pic with the same memory stick and camera and uploaded it directly from the stick and it again says "saturation adjusted". not sure what that's all about but the site is clearly not gospel. apparently it doesn't like certain settings on the camera itself. last i checked, using the appropriate setting on one's digital camera is not "cheating".
 

Attachments

KushXOJ

KushXOJ

Well-Known Member
Total Head said:
for the record, i went to that pskiller site and uploaded pictures straight off a sony memory stick and every single one said "saturation adjusted". i have never adjusted any of the photos, not even to crop out the datestamp. for what purpose would i adjust the saturation on a picture of a joint?




i also uploaded the pic directly off the memory stick. i'd love for someone to explain how this picture was adjusted. i own absolutely no picture editing software except for whatever comes with windows photo viewer, and i only use that for cropping (which this picture is not).

edit: i just went and snapped an experimental pic with the same memory stick and camera and uploaded it directly from the stick and it again says "saturation adjusted". not sure what that's all about but the site is clearly not gospel. apparently it doesn't like certain settings on the camera itself. last i checked, using the appropriate setting on one's digital camera is not "cheating".
Click to expand...
Idk I just uploaded a couple pics and they all came back not manipulated

Then I uploaded this pic


which I took today and it said the same thing as yours.
I know I didn't edit it but it says saturation adjusted.
 
CR500ROOST

CR500ROOST

Well-Known Member
ScoobyDoobyDoo said:
i'm not harrassing him. he started shit in an AN thread in nutrients and hijacked it. then posted a link to that thread like 3 different times on 1 page talking shit to all of us. then he commented in the thread after he posted the pics. he basically states in the thread on AN that anyone that posts in toke and talk most of the time is not a grower.

get your facts straight pal before you open your mouth.
Click to expand...
Phil is gonna get banned again.
 
VLRD.Kush

VLRD.Kush

Well-Known Member
Proved me wrong Homebrewer. Guess I should have stayed in school longer, hahaha. It must be the flash on the white that makes the bone super white but the background not really, which gives it an optical illusion of sorts. Nice buds BTW, and fire looking kief you lucky son of a gun
 
ganjames

ganjames

Well-Known Member
apparently this photo of photoshop was photoshopped.



Image has cloned areas.
Make/Model information is missing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top