I would like to get to the bottom of this fact or fiction wavelength debate. Has anyone done any real testing with 420nm vs. 460nm to see which is more beneficial or not necessary? I've heard mixed messages when it comes to this debate. It doesn't seem like there is a clear answer. Lately, I've heard that 420nm is the preferred wavelength.
I do know that the Hortilux Blue MH lamp has to be the best lamp out there for growing. I've only seen great results growing with the Horti Blue. I do know that the lamp contains much lower blue wavelengths down into the 400nm region so could this be the answer? I do know that this lamp has more 420nm than 460nm. It seems the 460nm may be of less importance than the violet wavelengths, 400-420nm. With this being said, I would like to see some side by side comparison between using 460nm and not using 460nm. Has anyone tried combining lamps only using the UVL super actinic for the blue light? Anyone tried mixing only UVL super actinic and UVL red suns yet? Results? I only want tried and true proof, not opinions. The web is full of opinions and not so much actual fact, so please do not quote some science webpage or opinion from someone else because all that matter is facts, tried and true experimentation with photos, etc.
thanks for your input