Thinking of voting for 0bama?

DelSlow

Well-Known Member
Yeah people talked a lot of shit about Bush too. However I was making $76,000 a year when Bush was in office. Right now I'm broke as shit and can't find a job to save my life. So.... Obama sucks my pussy. And I already have health insurance soo what's the point in mandating that I have it... like wtf back the fuck off
cause that totally has everything to do with Obama right?
This guy thinks so.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cause that totally has everything to do with Obama right?
it's so funny.

anything remotely negative that happens is 100% obama's direct fault. see f&f (boy that got legs, eh? :lol:).

but anything positive that happens is just mere circumstance. see the death of osama bin laden or the improving economy.

a ridiculous double standard implemented by whiney pussies.
 

deprave

New Member
it's so funny.

anything remotely negative that happens is 100% obama's direct fault. see f&f (boy that got legs, eh? :lol:).

but anything positive that happens is just mere circumstance. see the death of osama bin laden or the improving economy.

a ridiculous double standard implemented by whiney pussies.
Its how they divide you realy, think about it, Obama blames the republicans for everything and then the republicans blame Obama for everything.

Don't you just hate those nasty republicans/democrats? omg I do too, they are always at fault. I am so angry right now I am going to vote republican/democrat to make sure that democrat/republican that I hate so much doesn't get elected.

In the end we all lose out, we got trolled by some gangsters into voting for their golf buddies. Corruption continues, nothing changes.
 

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
I blame Ron Paul for running freaking Republican. If only he had the guts this time around to make a stand and run Independent. Why did he not do this. I blame Ron Paul.
You would vote for Ron Paul if he had anything other than an "R" after his name?
 

deprave

New Member
Its how they divide you realy, think about it, Obama blames the republicans for everything and then the republicans blame Obama for everything.

Don't you just hate those nasty republicans/democrats? omg I do too, they are always at fault. I am so angry right now I am going to vote republican/democrat to make sure that democrat/republican that I hate so much doesn't get elected.

In the end we all lose out, we got trolled by some gangsters into voting for their golf buddies. Corruption continues, nothing changes.
I mean this stuff is really simple, I learned in grade school we would watch the debates and count the number of lies. We also learned that there is little difference between republican's and democrats and the way the two party system is setup to get us to vote for the lesser evil when really its a false choice, I think 2nd or 3rd grade I learned this stuff? Why does it seem soo many people never learned this stuff?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You would vote for Ron Paul if he had anything other than an "R" after his name?
He should have gave the people another choice. Running R was stupid because, ( as I said before many many times) they will never give him the nod. Why waste his and supporters time. If you not in it to win it then why the fuck you in it ?? Independent he would still be in the run for POTUS. Damn you Ron Paul.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
I mean this stuff is really simple, I learned in grade school we would watch the debates and count the number of lies. We also learned that there is little difference between republican's and democrats and the way the two party system is setup to get us to vote for the lesser evil when really its a false choice, I think 2nd or 3rd grade I learned this stuff? Why does it seem soo many people never learned this stuff?
because they never saw Ron Paul youtube video
 

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
He should have gave the people another choice. Running R was stupid because, ( as I said before many many times) they will never give him the nod. Why waste his and supporters time. If you not in it to win it then why the fuck you in it ?? Independent he would still be in the run for POTUS. Damn you Ron Paul.
Nice speech, kind of naive but I'm still waiting for your answer, though.
 

Justin00

Active Member
we gave Obama his chance and he fuck us, i guess its Romney's turn now. I would rather give Romney a try then stick with what we know doesn't work.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
we gave Obama his chance and he fuck us, i guess its Romney's turn now. I would rather give Romney a try then stick with what we know doesn't work.
How did Obama fuck you again ????? and what will Romney do that will be better ????
 

medicineman

New Member
we gave Obama his chance and he fuck us, i guess its Romney's turn now. I would rather give Romney a try then stick with what we know doesn't work.
I guess you are a very rich fuck then. Romney came from "BIG" money and never looked back. He is a country club dude and proud of it. If you are a country club dude, then by all means, you should vote for Romney, otherwise, a vote for Romney would be infinintly stupid. By the way. most of what hasn't worked is stuff Obama tried to get through the congress and was blocked by the republicans, jobs bills and such. It is a wonder there are any jobs with the republicans blocking anything that would make Obama look good. You must remember their mantra, "make Obama a one term president at all costs".
 

deprave

New Member
I guess you are a very rich fuck then. Romney came from "BIG" money and never looked back. He is a country club dude and proud of it. If you are a country club dude, then by all means, you should vote for Romney, otherwise, a vote for Romney would be infinintly stupid. By the way. most of what hasn't worked is stuff Obama tried to get through the congress and was blocked by the republicans, jobs bills and such. It is a wonder there are any jobs with the republicans blocking anything that would make Obama look good. You must remember their mantra, "make Obama a one term president at all costs".
Rich or Poor a vote for Obama or Romney is "infinintly stupid"
 

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
The Obumba administration repeats same jobs line—for the 30th month.....




June 2012: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is informative to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/07/06/employment-situation-june)

May 2012: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/06/01/employment-situation-may)

April 2012: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/05/04/employment-situation-april)

March 2012: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/06/employment-situation-march)

February 2012: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report; nevertheless, the trend in job market indicators over recent months is an encouraging sign." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/09/employment-situation-february)

January 2012: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report; nevertheless, the trend in job market indicators over recent months is an encouraging sign." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/02/03/employment-situation-january)

December 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/06/employment-situation-december)

November 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/12/02/employment-situation-november)

October 2011: "The monthly employment and unemployment numbers are volatile and employment estimates are subject to substantial revision. There is no better example than August's jobs figure, which was initially reported at zero and in the latest revision increased to 104,000. This illustrates why the Administration always stresses it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/11/04/employment-situation-october)

September 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/10/07/employment-situation-september)

August 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/09/02/employment-situation-august)

July 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/08/05/employment-situation-july)

June 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/07/08/employment-situation-june)

May 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/06/03/employment-situation-may)

April 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/06/employment-situation-april)

March 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/01/employment-situation-march)

February 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/03/04/employment-situation-february)

January 2011: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/02/04/employment-situation-january)

December 2010: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/01/07/employment-situation-december)

November 2010: "Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/12/03/employment-situation-november)

October 2010: "Given the volatility in monthly employment and unemployment data, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/11/05/employment-situation-october)

September 2010: "Given the volatility in the monthly employment and unemployment data, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/10/08/employment-situation-september)

July 2010: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative. It is essential that we continue our efforts to move in the right direction and replace job losses with robust job gains." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/08/06/employment-situation-july)

August 2010: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/09/03/employment-situation-august)

June 2010: "As always, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/07/02/employment-situation-june)

May 2010: "As always, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/04/employment-situation-may)

April 2010: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/05/07/employment-situation-april)

March 2010: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/04/02/employment-situation-march)

January 2010: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/02/05/employment-situation-january)

November 2009: "Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative." (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2009/12/04/employment-situation-november)
 

Hemlock

Well-Known Member
I guess you are a very rich fuck then. Romney came from "BIG" money and never looked back. He is a country club dude and proud of it. If you are a country club dude, then by all means, you should vote for Romney, otherwise, a vote for Romney would be infinintly stupid. By the way. most of what hasn't worked is stuff Obama tried to get through the congress and was blocked by the republicans, jobs bills and such. It is a wonder there are any jobs with the republicans blocking anything that would make Obama look good. You must remember their mantra, "make Obama a one term president at all costs".

Bullshit Obama had the House and Senate for 2 plus years...All he did was spend spend spend. Supply side economics don't work ask the former USSR.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Bullshit Obama had the House and Senate for 2 plus years...All he did was spend spend spend. Supply side economics don't work ask the former USSR.
Despite what Republicans and the tea party would
like to have Americans believe, taxes, spending and the deficit are all lower
than when President Obama took office.


Think Progress:

In January 2009, before President Obama had even
taken the oath of office, annual spending was set to total 24.9 percent of gross
domestic product. Total spending this year, fiscal year 2012, is expected to top
out at 23.4 percent of GDP.

Here’s another interesting fact. Taxes today are
lower than they were on inauguration day 2009. Back in January 2009, the CBO
projected that total federal tax revenue that year would amount to 16.5 percent
of GDP. This year? 15.8 percent.

One last nugget. The deficit this year is going to
be lower than what it was on the day President Obama took office. Back then, the
CBO said the 2009 deficit would be 8.3 percent of GDP. This year’s deficit is
expected to come in at 7.6 percent.

Read more
Another notable figure: When President Bush came
into office in 2001, he inherited a $281 billion federal budget surplus from the
Clinton administration. By the time Obama took over eight years later, the
deficit was $1.2 trillion. An interesting fact given that conservatives love to
blame Democrats—and in particular Obama—for America’s current economic problems.
—TEB
 
Top