trayvan martin

afrawfraw

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
Uncle Buck's Bastard Son said:
Tell us how Martin was provoked.
Click to expand...
Following someone and questioning someone is provoking an altercation if you insist after they refuse or remain silent. Not even a police officer can question you after you state you have no statement or remain silent. Maybe where you live it's OK to follow and question strangers. Try it sometime. See how warm a response you get. May I suggest someone with an NRA jacket on?
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
afrawfraw said:
Following someone and questioning someone is provoking an altercation if you insist after they refuse or remain silent. Not even a police officer can question you after you state you have no statement or remain silent. Maybe where you live it's OK to follow and question strangers. Try it sometime. See how warm a response you get. May I suggest someone with an NRA jacket on?
Click to expand...
The police can ask as many questions as they like, even after you say you won't answer them. Its up to YOU to not answer, the police have no duty to keep silent, that is your right.

FYI It's ok to follow anyone at any time, you do it every single time you drive your car,or walk down the street. If you think that is provocation, well then I guess you should start ducking all the bullets that come your way.

FYI I have never had anyone try to shoot me because they felt I provoked a situation by going the same direction as they.
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
and yet still, he had no right to follow, him with the intent to question him, in his mind set(all these fuckers get away)

not on duty

no crime had been committed

and the police were already on the way

following and questioning were over kill, and so was the firearm he was told not to carry when he is on patrol, so when hes not on work its ok to be a vigilante 7-11 shopper hall monitor

he abused his power and shot a innocent kid as a result

thats about it

hes not a monster hes just a human, and now he has to pay karma back imo
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
and yet still, he had no right to follow, him with the intent to question him, in his mind set(all these fuckers get away)

not on duty

no crime had been committed

and the police were already on the way

following and questioning were over kill, and so was the firearm he was told not to carry when he is on patrol, so when hes not on work its ok to be a vigilante 7-11 shopper hall monitor

he abused his power and shot a innocent kid as a result

thats about it

hes not a monster hes just a human, and now he has to pay karma back imo
Click to expand...
I highlighted all the spin and lies and non facts for you so others wouldn't have to .

Neighborhood watch isn't a job, it has no rules you are bound to, there is no patrol and he was never told to not carry a weapon.

Some people don't even know the smallest facts, yet they feel they can sit and judge others. LOL
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
the laws in American prevent people from harassing each other with firearms without provocation not the other way around, you two cowboys got it twisted

you dont get to play cops and robbers as a private citizen then go opps guess it went to far, when your an adult you take responsibility for your actions
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
no one has even tried to answer my question, which is the main question that has to be answered for this case to make any sense.

how many more people are going to make the assumption that martin was attacking rather than defending himself despite all the evidence showing zimm to be the aggressor on offense while martin ran away and talked on his phone?

where does this unfounded assumption come from? are pot smokers generally known as violent people?

seriously, someone needs to explain this assumption to me. what enraged martin so much that after running away, he went on the attack? what was his motive?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
this strikes me as strange

[youtube]ZIi3YlWBw7w[/youtube]
Click to expand...
a left handed holster on his right waist band drawn with his right hand?

LOL!

had no idea zimm was a contortionist! must be double jointed!

i bet martin just got real tired of landing haymakers and just sat back and watched as zimm unholstered the gun, flipped it right side up, aimed and shot.

cannabis made him lazy. count this death as attributable to cannabis, not guns. in the hands of violent dumbasses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top