How are we here..?

BongTokinAlcoholic420

BongTokinAlcoholic420

Well-Known Member
Shannon Alexander said:
I don't really care as to why we are here. That in my opinion is a far less important question, I want to know how we are here.


Something can not come from nothing... So how are we here, how is anything here..?
Click to expand...
We are here by the Power of some Supernatural Being called GOD ... He is the reason for all the atoms going the way they going ... and for Everything in the universe ..
 
olylifter420

olylifter420

Well-Known Member
no, I would like to hear it from you actually... I understand the process... I would just like to read how you write
 
Zaehet Strife

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
To me, it matters not who says it, how they say it, how they spell it, or how it is presented. Just as long as the message gets across in the intended way, and the recipient can fully understand, that is all that matters.

If he were to use his "own" words, he would literally being saying the same exact thing...merely in a different way.

If you do not understand the concepts of the big bang as presented, and you need them put in a simplier format to be able to understand, i can see how asking him to present it in a different way is a legitimate question.
 
blazinkill504

blazinkill504

Well-Known Member
we're here cause i put you all here. i am god. you can stop wonderin now. by the way dont start buggin me with your feeble requests for more money an vagina.

GOD has spoken.
 
olylifter420

olylifter420

Well-Known Member
no man... I think you can tell a lot from how a person writes a research paper. That is why I made the proposition.

and nowhere did I say that he do it in his own words because I did not understand the concept.





Zaehet Strife said:
To me, it matters not who says it, how they say it, how they spell it, or how it is presented. Just as long as the message gets across in the intended way, and the recipient can fully understand, that is all that matters.

If he were to use his "own" words, he would literally being saying the same exact thing...merely in a different way.

If you do not understand the concepts of the big bang as presented, and you need them put in a simplier format to be able to understand, i can see how asking him to present it in a different way is a legitimate question.
Click to expand...
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
olylifter420 said:
Noted. How sure are they that the bb brought this dimensionality and not something else? How are they sure it is dimensionality that was sprung from the bb, not something different?

Im just curious to know
Click to expand...
It does not have to spring from BB, but BB Theory must explain it. It is really so simple, that for me, it was a bit difficult to grasp, at first. Dimension is a quality of Space. But, even that is not enough. Without Matter, there is no way to qualify Space as having dimension. And without Space, only Matter, say, it also would be dimensionless, but a solid.

It is one of the most basic questions, as you point out. In Quntum speak however, it is all resolved. There is no dimension at all, unless we Observe it.

Since we are, at least for now, accounting for 11 dimensions in the widely accepted math, these new ones don't exist. But, when we figure out a way to observe them, they will. Weird. Some want to draw the line at the mircoscope, atomic lengths for the Uncertainty effects. But, there may have been observed macro Effects in history. These are the stuff of legend, perhaps. But, we cannot rule out, that someone managed to create a macro event by Observation alone. A tech so advanced it seems magical. BURN them.

They are locked up as crazy, or worse. And how will we ever know what is possible? We insist that the Reality be defined in a way that "everybody" can accept it, when we know it can't be. Beyond cetain levels like the Planke length and those wave/particle Uncertainty results, we have no idea.
 
tyler.durden

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
olylifter420 said:
bigotttttt
Click to expand...
I don't consider myself a bigot. Let's see what Webster's definition is:

Definition of BIGOT

: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

That doesn't sound like me, I change my views when empirical evidence shows me that I am incorrect, and I don't think I've been intolerant of or hated any group, maybe just a few individual fucktards. But, I could be wrong... I was obviously wrong about my url being funny ;)
 
Zaehet Strife

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
olylifter420 said:
bigotttttt
Click to expand...
A lot of times, when we call others names or uphold negative assertions towards another, with intentions of an antagonistic nature... if you can gain the ability to reflect within, you may find that it is merely a projection of the self, the ego, manifest within... directed towards another.
 
tyler.durden

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Zaehet Strife said:
A lot of times, when we call others names or uphold negative assertions towards another, with intentions of an antagonistic nature... if you can gain the ability to reflect within, you may find that it is merely a projection of the self, the ego, manifest within... directed towards another.
Click to expand...
"There's something about that guy that I just can't stand about myself..."
 
olylifter420

olylifter420

Well-Known Member
Yea, to me you are prejudice. Making these general statements...aimed at a specific group...

Zs... Say whaaaaaaaaaa
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top