Looks like another 4 years for Obama

[MuyLocoNC]

I'm conflicted this election. While I want Romney to win and to actually follow through and slash the size of the Federal government. Drastically reduce taxes for ALL citizens and nominate Conservative justices to the SCOTUS. I also want Obama in office to take full responsibility for the impending economic disaster resulting from his insane legislation, regulation and mandates.

A Romney presidency will give cover to the stupidity of the progressive agenda, where a second Obama term will exacerbate and accelerate the horror to come. Maybe we need to hit bottom for the grownups to convince the slobbering idiots that we have gone astray. Maybe a $20 trillion debt and an interest rate hike that has us paying $1-$2 trillion a year, just to pay the interest, will open a few partisan eyes.

Pretty sad that it comes to this. Flirting with economic disaster so we can continue the 80 year progressive agenda that had no business ever seeing the light of day in the first place. Me and mine will be just fine, I've prepared and saved, but when the full-on depression or collapse hits, all you chumps hollering to soak the rich and gimmee, gimmee, gimmee, are in for some VERY hard times.

 

[Omgwtfbbq Indicaman]

government can't work- so disassemble it- Romney 2012

 

[MuyLocoNC]

government can't work- so disassemble it- Romney 2012

Now you're talking.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm conflicted this election. While I want Romney to win and to actually follow through and slash the size of the Federal government. Drastically reduce taxes for ALL citizens and nominate Conservative justices to the SCOTUS. I also want Obama in office to take full responsibility for the impending economic disaster resulting from his insane legislation, regulation and mandates.

A Romney presidency will give cover to the stupidity of the progressive agenda, where a second Obama term will exacerbate and accelerate the horror to come. Maybe we need to hit bottom for the grownups to convince the slobbering idiots that we have gone astray. Maybe a $20 trillion debt and an interest rate hike that has us paying $1-$2 trillion a year, just to pay the interest, will open a few partisan eyes.

Pretty sad that it comes to this. Flirting with economic disaster so we can continue the 80 year progressive agenda that had no business ever seeing the light of day in the first place. Me and mine will be just fine, I've prepared and saved, but when the full-on depression or collapse hits, all you chumps hollering to soak the rich and gimmee, gimmee, gimmee, are in for some VERY hard times.

lol, so fucking dumb.

what happened to romney's 10 point lead in the polls, assmunch?

 

[Omgwtfbbq Indicaman]

Now you're talking.

if only we had competent people elected, then that wouldn't be an issue. lower the pay and benefits of elected officials too while were at it. let them feel what the common man feels.

 

[brotherjericho]

Romney, disassemble government? Cut spending? You folks aren't serious, are you? Mitt is simply going to grow government at slightly slower rate than Obama, further postponing the inevitable. Vote for Romney to slow down the debt train (and leave it to your grand kids) or vote for Obama to keep going at the break neck speed (and leave it to your kids).

 

[billybob420]

[youtube]RkAavAstfBc[/youtube]

The bird shares the mindset of 2nd term Bush jr and Obama voters.

I bet that dude won't be laughing after that bird breaks that glass and gets some of DAT ASS.

 

[Omgwtfbbq Indicaman]

he's trying to inflate the debt by MIC spending and war. that has been the fucking leech we need to get off our back. bring the military home and you'll have a stronger workforce imo.

 

[UncleBuck]

Romney, disassemble government? Cut spending? You folks aren't serious, are you? Mitt is simply going to grow government at slightly slower rate than Obama, further postponing the inevitable. Vote for Romney to slow down the debt train (and leave it to your grand kids) or vote for Obama to keep going at the break neck speed (and leave it to your kids).

republican policies turned a projected surplus into a $1.5 trillion annual deficit.

democratic policies have cut the deficit by nearly a third. wiped it out completely with bill in office.

republicans are the ones who rack up the debt then cry about the debt. witness paul ryan. democrats are the ones that undo the damage.

 

[Harrekin]

republican policies turned a projected surplus into a $1.5 trillion annual deficit.

democratic policies have cut the deficit by nearly a third. wiped it out completely with bill in office.

republicans are the ones who rack up the debt then cry about the debt. witness paul ryan. democrats are the ones that undo the damage.

Oh it's totally Bush's fault that Al Queda attacked on Sept 11th.

Yous all wanted war, now "it's too expensive" so blame the guy who gave us what we wanted at the time!

Also blame Republicans that people bought houses they couldn't afford.

 

[brotherjericho]

republican policies turned a projected surplus into a $1.5 trillion annual deficit.

democratic policies have cut the deficit by nearly a third. wiped it out completely with bill in office.

republicans are the ones who rack up the debt then cry about the debt. witness paul ryan. democrats are the ones that undo the damage.

Surplus my ass, that thing was imaginary as god. Please show me a single Clinton year where the actual deficit decreased to zero, then we can talk about surpluses.

 

[ChesusRice]

Surplus my ass, that thing was imaginary as god. Please show me a single Clinton year where the actual deficit decreased to zero, then we can talk about surpluses.

So you are saying the republican majority house and senate under clinton didnt reduce the budget defiicit?

 

[cannabineer]

Surplus my ass, that thing was imaginary as god. Please show me a single Clinton year where the actual deficit decreased to zero, then we can talk about surpluses.

 

[Carne Seca]

now that was a statistical bitch slap.

 

[brotherjericho]

So you are saying the republican majority house and senate under clinton didnt reduce the budget defiicit?

They decreased it, but the national debt increased every single year, and the yearly deficit was never reduced to zero. The "budget surplus" was based on public debt, and it was achieved by borrowing from intragovernmental holdings (mostly social security). The actual national debt, which consists of the public debt and intragovernmental holdings, never decreased in all of the Clinton years.

In fact, the 2001 budget, which belonged Clinton before he left office, was over $130 billion.

 

[beenthere]

So you are saying the republican majority house and senate under clinton didnt reduce the budget defiicit?

So you are giving republicans the credit???
A simple yes or no will do!

 

[brotherjericho]

now that was a statistical bitch slap.

I welcome both of you to go to http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np and show me the surplus.

 

[beenthere]

I welcome both of you to go to http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np and show me the surplus.

This is coming from the same people that claim America did well because tax rates were 90% LMAO

 

[Carne Seca]

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/

 

[brotherjericho]

This is coming from the same people that claim America did well because tax rates were 90% LMAO

Seriously, if they put in the applicable years of Clinton's presidency, they will see that public debt did decrease, but the national debt continued to increase. So this "budget surplus" talk is solely based on only one piece of the pie.