Immigration background checks?

Doer

Well-Known Member
Do you think this will be as strict as gun checks? Not what I'm hearing....
 

gagekko

Well-Known Member
I think all Israeli's should undergo the most stringent of background checks as they commit or support most terror operations in the world
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
I think all Israeli's should undergo the most stringent of background checks as they commit or support most terror operations in the world
Oh, I agree with that. I have undergone a most extensive background check, the first secret level for US citizens. Q clearance for Livermore Labs. About 3 pages of how do we prove you? First grade teacher, second grade, 3rd grade.
All the senior high teachers that graduated me. Name of dorm at college.

So, Mossad and KGB, get around that all the time with sleepers.....and now coming to a city near you Jehad.

Mossad Jehad, OK, I will even stipulated that maybe, given a shred.

You personal problem seem to be you hate to be disagreed with.

So, this time I'm agreeing. Sometimes I even ageee with Bucky but mostly we amuse each other. (he does NOT!!) :)

Feeling better? I agree. Now back to the point. What is a background check for undocumented guest workers, if known gang affiliation, etc is OK?

And compare that to gun registration plans proposed.

I hate most everyone. Including my fellow Americans, Israelist.Jehadist, stupid-trons, all that.

I'm a Che-ist. Struggle for Justice, be me. Not to be won ever really, but to have the system to continue that struggle. No Royalty of thought that goes with power. The Way of the Gun levels all fields.

I don't take sides and and I toughen my pussy parts in sandy acid, get it?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Republican logic:

Background checks for gun owning terrorists = bad!

Background checks for immigrants = good.



Background checks for gun owning terrorists? If they already own the gun, why would there be a background check, and if they already know they are terrorists, who pass the background check knowing the owner is a terrorist? Is that like knowing you have people taking airplane flying lessons but don't want to learn how to land??

I think you should reword that first part to say:

Background checks for people that want to own guns. Oh shit, we already do that.

People that already own them don't need background checks.

then again any terrorist worth his salt would not purchase a gun and leave a paper trail, he would buy it illegally so that it can never be traced.

Most terrorists in the USA are from a different country, which makes background checks for immigrants good.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
I think you should reword that first part to say:

Background checks for people that want to own guns. Oh shit, we already do that.

People that already own them don't need background checks.

then again any terrorist worth his salt would not purchase a gun and leave a paper trail, he would buy it illegally so that it can never be traced.

Most terrorists in the USA are from a different country, which makes background checks for immigrants good.
I found one gun on the side of the road. Checked out clean, so i kept it. The Dartmouth Twins, just ambushed a cop.

"Guns we need for what is to come"...Doer
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Oh really, did that get de-railed already? America Fuck Yeah!
Cell phone auto correction and lack of time

Immigrants gets extensive background checks that include the State Department, FBI and CIA along with inquiries to the intelligence services of the country they are from.
 

echelon1k1

New Member
Oh, I agree with that. I have undergone a most extensive background check, the first secret level for US citizens. Q clearance for Livermore Labs.
Goddamn you're a lying piece of shit... My family members in the US hold TS/SCI clearances. Q clearances are not entry level.

Furthermore, dyslexics have no need for TSC clearances...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"i want to come and work to feed my starving family" - universal and extensive background check.

"i want a tool capable of inflicting maximum carnage as efficiently as possible" - non-extensive background check, not universal, easily bypassed

huzzah!
 

thecoolman

New Member
"i want to come and work to feed my starving family" - universal and extensive background check.

"i want a tool capable of inflicting maximum carnage as efficiently as possible" - non-extensive background check, not universal, easily bypassed

huzzah!
Bucky you must be refering to the regimes fast and furious arms suply of the Mexican cartels.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
"i want to come and work to feed my starving family" - universal and extensive background check.

"i want a tool capable of inflicting maximum carnage as efficiently as possible" - non-extensive background check, not universal, easily bypassed

huzzah!
No right, at all, to come to the USA, just to try to feed their families.

All Rights implied for Citizens. Including Gun keeping and bearing, specifically allowed.

I am really surprised when the Constitution doesn't seem to matter. It is called moral equivalence and is why we have the Founding Docs.

It is so someone cannot come along and say everyone in the world has the right to drag their starving situation to us.

You cannot say that illegal activity (despite any heart bleeds,) has any equivalence, morally, to us protecting ourselves via the Founding, from you and them.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No right, at all, to come to the USA, just to try to feed their families.

All Rights implied for Citizens. Including Gun keeping and bearing, specifically allowed.

I am really surprised when the Constitution doesn't seem to matter. It is called moral equivalence and is why we have the Founding Docs.

It is so someone cannot come along and say everyone in the world has the right to drag their starving situation to us.

You cannot say that illegal activity (despite any heart bleeds,) has any equivalence, morally, to us protecting ourselves via the Founding, from you and them.
the second amendment does not give anyone and everyone the right to own any and all type of weapons. heller made that very clear.

i know some people want to pretend that the second gives every mentally unstable psycho the right to arm themselves to the teeth without any background check, but that is not the case. so you can't invoke it. invoking the second with regards to background checks is categorically retarded and indicates weakness on your part.

my argument was on public safety, and there are no two ways around it. employers need these workers, and yet they are treated as more deadly than james holmes in a crowded rally with a drum.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
I totally agree. I've written about the loaming population decline as the liberated women are needed in business more and more and baby making is put off. It is already happening.

So, don't get me wrong, to me this is all fine. And is just sorta what Reagan did. Fine people, these huddled masses yearning to be free. We welcome them in different ways that usually seem strange at the time. I'm for no background checks.

That is not solely due to the idiots doing the checking. It also has to do with the sad hash self rule is. It is only a sham this border, iac. It is a show piece for and by idiots, not half in or out, not nothing.....divide by zero/'null.

We are busy educating Jehadists.

What me worry? No, says Bill B. Ruger...a long time ago. I worry much less with me fire arms around, if ye must know.
 
Top