9/11 what do you think?

T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
That's called dis-information, just like how the Taliban on camera will claim to have killed thousands of infadels, when the opposite is true. And if you understood the mentality behind sunni-takfirs, you'd understand that your assumption is incorrect. War is deceit and "taqiyya" is only practiced by the Shia.
Click to expand...
Religious people supposedly acting for their religions have consistently broken their religious tenets throughout human history. It's human nature. If you think anyone is immune, I think you're being far too generous.

That said, what are you basing your claim on in the first place? My Google search found only one non-9/11-conspiracy source, which said that the claimed antics had been dismissed.
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
No when he realised he might not make it, he made a 330 degree turn 5miles out, at the end of which the plane dove a couple of thousand feet, at 500mph, then hit the target. I don't believe in coincidences, 1 guy getting lucky fine... But 3 getting lucky...
Click to expand...
Why presume that three got lucky? Did the other pilots have to execute the supposedly difficult turn that you're complaining about?
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
tokeprep said:
Religious people supposedly acting for their religions have consistently broken their religious tenets throughout human history. It's human nature. If you think anyone is immune, I think you're being far too generous.

That said, what are you basing your claim on in the first place? My Google search found only one non-9/11-conspiracy source, which said that the claimed antics had been dismissed.
Click to expand...
people who used to work outta the pentagon familiar with AQ/UBL...
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
echelon1k1 said:
That's called dis-information, just like how the Taliban on camera will claim to have killed thousands of infadels, when the opposite is true. And if you understood the mentality behind sunni-takfirs, you'd understand that your assumption is incorrect. War is deceit and "taqiyya" is only practiced by the Shia.
Click to expand...
They like to Shiite us? cn
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
tokeprep said:
Are you? What makes you qualified to say that the flights would be difficult for people who had months of flight training and preparation?
Click to expand...
I am not. I'm not even claiming I could do what we saw that day. I'm not claiming what they did would be "easy" either, you seem to think it would.

You jumped in here after I questioned another claim that $100 will train you to hit a building and that that it'd be easy to do and I would take the term "flying" to mean navigating too.

Apparently it's just like driving a car then moving onto a truck. A comment like that proves you have never driven anything over 2t GVM or you would know there's a little more to it.
 
Novicehomegrower

Novicehomegrower

New Member
and as i said before you need years of training and simulation to be able to fly a plane, those who think you could be that accurate with a few months training are illogical
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Novicehomegrower said:
last post in this thread

best video ever to be filmed showing how it was a controlled demo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cvWwIxMbmE

try to debunk this you faktriots
Click to expand...
This is the evidence/////??????? you and ilks are jokes. This is just getting worse and worse.

The plane was lost in the plume of smoke of the other building. Then after the pan the plane turned and was descended thru the smoke out of the camera zoom angle.

Too easy. I'm done. Much video exists from other angles and you don't look.

Those don't have the lens trick. And thats why you don't what to know. Like a religion.

Believing an accidental, a lens trick in real time from one angle. is a religion.

This entire thing is the special camera angle conspiracy. In that if it only was film at these certain angles and there was no other evidence then it could have been.

It's like a movie set. Smoke and mirrors. You are confusing these very few out of very many camera shots for reality.

Like Hollywood and no other evidence. Check that plane strike from other angles, fuck not. Too hard, right? Against your religion to find out.

You total idiots will or not grow out of it. But, it's not adult discussion, imo. I did get to see two more pieces of your religious icons, is all.

And so you are of the very far out, that thinks they lugged up ton of explosives and set demo changes that weekend without alerting anyone that is not now dead.....sad little boy with a wasted brain.

You hate Bush. So transparent.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Novicehomegrower said:
and as i said before you need years of training and simulation to be able to fly a plane, those who think you could be that accurate with a few months training are illogical
Click to expand...
You are not answering. I have flown, I took the lessons, I know. You don't very simple. And if this is what you call logic you are not very employable imo.....(I'm a hiring manager.) You fail the idiot test.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Hitting a vertical bullseye when you're not worried about style points like survival is really easy. cn
Click to expand...
People do it all the time. A ball player turning his Cirrus around over the east river VFR corridor could not miss the building.

The next month, after 9/11, in Oct. kid in TAMPA with no training flew the stolen Cessna into a bank or something.

Take a discovery flight before the brain fry mashes you, I tell these morons. The hard part is to not hit the buildings.

A plane making a turn back to the airport recently in South America lost hydroponics (right Freud!) hydraulics and swooped down into an apt ring.

He was still turning back and almost made it but the turn carried him thu most of the apt buildings.

Go fly and knock off the toke and talk, kids "logic.".

Just look up building strikes from airliners.

The easy part is to hit.
 
Novicehomegrower

Novicehomegrower

New Member
im winding you up i dont believe the no plain theory .. how ever i stand by that it would be difficult to accurately pull of such an attack
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top