how to up thc and other characteristics ?

legallyflying

Well-Known Member
Has there been any studies or people getting the same strain tested after using UV?

The best way to get more potent strain is to seek it out.
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
Has there been any studies or people getting the same strain tested after using UV?

The best way to get more potent strain is to seek it out.
Ok, yes here you go
Same mother
Clones for each grow

non-uvb results
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-267/NM_BD16_12_28_12.pdf

uvb results
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-283/NM_BD17_2_7_13.pdf

same growth chamber all temps and rh maintained the same as was feed schedule and strength only difference was the addition of 12% arcadia T5 ho 54 watts in place of blue actinic 450 nm peak tubes
 

MajorCoco

Well-Known Member
As mentioned, UV seems to have an impact, as does harsh water conditions (strain dependent), however the increases in THC content seem to me to be marginal. Genetics is singularly the most important factor for potency. In-breeding and phenome selection is the way to improve genetics without going outside the pool.
 

maryjaneslave

Active Member
stress training can work, last session i hade a main branch break halfway, it recoverd and with the flowering nutes it turned the leafs half purple, the plant diverted the nutes to wear it really needed it. but to get the most thc, dont fuck up ur plants, its all in its genes
 

Trousers

Well-Known Member
Being an excellent grower is the best way to improve thc.

I got a purple erkle clone (I needed a quick finisher before vacation. It finished in 51 days, no problem) and a sample of the dispensary's purple erkle.

The dispensary's PE was not nearly as good as mine turned out. Maybe they have a shitty cure, or do not really know how to grow, but mine was leaps and bounds better than theirs.

I'm not saying I am an excellent grower, but I am better than some "professionals."
 

Impman

Well-Known Member
Ok, yes here you go
Same mother
Clones for each grow

non-uvb results
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-267/NM_BD16_12_28_12.pdf

uvb results
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-283/NM_BD17_2_7_13.pdf

same growth chamber all temps and rh maintained the same as was feed schedule and strength only difference was the addition of 12% arcadia T5 ho 54 watts in place of blue actinic 450 nm peak tubes
EVERY HPS bulb gives off UVB. Where the hell did they even get a non UVB bulb? That test is whack. They need to study different brands of bulbs. A HPS Eye Hortilux has more than enough Blue and Red , UVB, to give you max THC potency as do many/most HPS bulbs.
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
EVERY HPS bulb gives off UVB. Where the hell did they even get a non UVB bulb? That test is whack. They need to study different brands of bulbs. A HPS Eye Hortilux has more than enough Blue and Red , UVB, to give you max THC potency as do many/most HPS bulbs.
Apologies but my UVB meter shows no usable amounts of UVB emitted due to the glass of the outer envelope of all the numerous lamps I have tested, eye hortilux included. There is no single lamp that has it all covered spectrum wise. Cmh comes close but still no useful amount of UVB.

The glass formulation must include enough quartz to allow UVB as it is ILLEGAL according to Federal Law for these lamps to emit UVB to protect our eyes and skin. All horticultural bulbs are indeed used around humans so no HIDs have the correct and more costly glass formulations. Therefore the only lamps that do emit UVB in high enough amounts to cause effect to the synthase proteins are a couple of brands of reptile bulbs Arcadia and Megaray.

Stop believing manufacturer hype and get yourself some meters. You will see they all lie. Your attack on the results are full of fallacy. To be expected as you are not knowledgeable in this area. I have researched and tested these things with meters and lab results so I do know and am sharing. Those are my test results.
 

Pepe le skunk

Well-Known Member
Kite is right on about hps not having uvb. All I can say is the buds exposed to uvb from week 3 of flower to harvest are fantasticly potent.

Not having PM, mites or thrips in flower is a good way to have better quality. Lots of light and good air flow also helps alot.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
was wondering how to up the level of thc in oone strain? no going outside the genetics to get it.
Unless you can measure and confirm the differences using lab equipment/analysis, why would you bother? Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean squat and it's human nature to see what we want or expect to see.

UB
 

Mad Hamish

Well-Known Member
Apologies but my UVB meter shows no usable amounts of UVB emitted due to the glass of the outer envelope of all the numerous lamps I have tested, eye hortilux included. There is no single lamp that has it all covered spectrum wise. Cmh comes close but still no useful amount of UVB.

The glass formulation must include enough quartz to allow UVB as it is ILLEGAL according to Federal Law for these lamps to emit UVB to protect our eyes and skin. All horticultural bulbs are indeed used around humans so no HIDs have the correct and more costly glass formulations. Therefore the only lamps that do emit UVB in high enough amounts to cause effect to the synthase proteins are a couple of brands of reptile bulbs Arcadia and Megaray.

Stop believing manufacturer hype and get yourself some meters. You will see they all lie. Your attack on the results are full of fallacy. To be expected as you are not knowledgeable in this area. I have researched and tested these things with meters and lab results so I do know and am sharing. Those are my test results.
OK I've looked them up, I can find little 13-watt UVB lamps meant for reptiles over here. So, if I want to supplement A- one 400 watt MH for mums and B- 2 600w HPS fixtures, how would you suggest I go about it? Any idea of how many per square meter I'd need? Any idea of safe distance?

I'm super-curious...
 

Mad Hamish

Well-Known Member
Unless you can measure and confirm the differences using lab equipment/analysis, why would you bother? Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean squat and it's human nature to see what we want or expect to see.

UB
Nothing wrong with being curious. And it so happens that somebody that DOES have the ability to measure with lab results popped by with an answer. Because wanting to do the best you can is fucking AWESOME.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Ok, yes here you go
Same mother
Clones for each grow

non-uvb results
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-267/NM_BD16_12_28_12.pdf

uvb results
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-283/NM_BD17_2_7_13.pdf

same growth chamber all temps and rh maintained the same as was feed schedule and strength only difference was the addition of 12% arcadia T5 ho 54 watts in place of blue actinic 450 nm peak tubes
^ That's what I'm talkin' bout!
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
OK I've looked them up, I can find little 13-watt UVB lamps meant for reptiles over here. So, if I want to supplement A- one 400 watt MH for mums and B- 2 600w HPS fixtures, how would you suggest I go about it? Any idea of how many per square meter I'd need? Any idea of safe distance?

I'm super-curious...
Well not to disappoint you but rather to keep you from wasting time and energy none of the cfls I have tested, which were many at quite the cost, emit enough UVB to effect the causation we seek. It takes 150-400 uw/cm2. Over 400 yield reduction occurs with no additional benefit. The cfls tested from 13 - 65 watts the best output at 4 inches was 85 uw/cm2.

These are the only affordable fluorescent tubes that emit enough and it is at 12-18 inches from the tubes.
http://www.lightyourreptiles.com/ard3t546in54.html
 

Pepe le skunk

Well-Known Member
Here is a good example of a way it could be done. 4 Zoo med 10% UVB 40 watt and 2 95 watt 7% UVB bulbs. Rotating the crop for even exposure is important. So all sides receive light during flowering when trich's are building the most. This is supplemental to 3 600's hps and a 1K MH Blue enhanced Hortilux bare bulb in center. Hope to get the 12% bulbs but this worked well for now...
Hope that helps.
Week6 UVBrs.jpgX10 macro.jpgCIMG0157.jpgCIMG0162.jpgCIMG0164.jpg
 

legallyflying

Well-Known Member
Has anyone ever used the mega ray? Awhile back when I was interested in UV I was looking at one and try we're all sold out. They also stated that you needed to call and ask permission to order it...should only be used by proffesionals.

I do reca however a very respected grower on this forum tried a bunch of different bulbs, combos, etc and basically said that given the amount needed, the flouro tubes were not worth it.
 

Mad Hamish

Well-Known Member
Well not to disappoint you but rather to keep you from wasting time and energy none of the cfls I have tested, which were many at quite the cost, emit enough UVB to effect the causation we seek. It takes 150-400 uw/cm2. Over 400 yield reduction occurs with no additional benefit. The cfls tested from 13 - 65 watts the best output at 4 inches was 85 uw/cm2.

These are the only affordable fluorescent tubes that emit enough and it is at 12-18 inches from the tubes.
http://www.lightyourreptiles.com/ard3t546in54.html
Thanks for that! Yeah unfortunately for me I'll have to import as per usual with most things NICE. Definitely going onto my 'want' list...
 
Top