ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Well since he killed the only witnessThis whole following argument is ridiculous. It's a desperate attempt to prove that Zimmerman was the aggressor in the fight without providing any evidence what so ever. It barely meets the standards for preponderance of evidence (if that) and is a clear example of big mouths trying to convict in the court of public opinion. This is a criminal case, not civil. There is such a thing as reasonable doubt.
You will have to excuse me for thinking someone who went against his neighborhood watch guidelines and didnt listen to the dispatcher, that he is culpable in the death of someone he was self admittaly stalking.