The behavior of the right vs the behavior of the left, a study in contrast.

[nontheist]

i don't think anyone is being dishonest, i think you actually believe that gallup is doing better polling, which is false.

you are a liar again and again and again, butt in this case, you are just uninformed and arrogant and stupid.

NBC and FOX fared far better in accuracy in 2012 than gallup, which was near dead last.

Boy does you post stink of desperation. Well I posted a link showing about every poll available showing how completely foolish you look. So far everything you have posted is a fucking lie.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=syria+poll
Fucking msnbc hahaha

 

[UncleBuck]

Boy does you post stink of desperation. Well I posted a link showing about every poll available showing how completely foolish you look. So far everything you have posted is a fucking lie.

Fucking msnbc hahaha

i posted an NBC poll. you posted a gallup poll.

NBC has a better track record than gallup.

in desperation, you posted a link to a google search of "syria poll", which is about your juvenile level.

i posted a link to a specifically worded question about whether americans support the type of attack obama wants. 50% want it.

if you ask people "do you want a huge war with syria?", most will say no. DUH.

if you ask people more specifically if they want a targeted strike with cruise missiles and no boots on the ground, half say yes.

being accurate and precise is not desperation, it is smart.

desperate is posting your google searches (but clearly not your "dog fucking" google searches).

you stink of canine vaginal discharge and year old "greese".

 

[Canna Sylvan]

go chase your morality bunnies elsewhere.

i was simply pointing out that 50% of americans support the type of strike obama wants, it will fly by the senate and probably pass the house too, and we have nearly a dozen allies expressing verbal support.*

hell, if sending mules makes you W's ally, then sending humanitarian assistance should put you in obama's coalition, even though i will not count it here.

just doing my service to the board to point out what a lying sack of shit nonthinkist is.

So you admit your political philosophy has nothing to do with morality, and is only about forcing others into submission for their own good. At least you're a honest liberal douche.

 

[nontheist]

i posted an NBC poll. you posted a gallup poll.

NBC has a better track record than gallup.

in desperation, you posted a link to a google search of "syria poll", which is about your juvenile level.

i posted a link to a specifically worded question about whether americans support the type of attack obama wants. 50% want it.

if you ask people "do you want a huge war with syria?", most will say no. DUH.

if you ask people more specifically if they want a targeted strike with cruise missiles and no boots on the ground, half say yes.

being accurate and precise is not desperation, it is smart.

desperate is posting your google searches (but clearly not your "dog fucking" google searches).

you stink of canine vaginal discharge and year old "greese".

you posted a pdf from MSNBC, that's enough to show anyone you're full of shit. I posted a link to get all polls available, sure exposing your partisan lies was a perk but I am the only one being hones here you lying hack.

 

[nontheist]

oh I will make the deal even sweeter. MSNBC showing that more americans opposed to strikes. BAHAHAHAHA so much fail

48% of Americans oppose military airstrikes in the country as a response to the Assad regime’s suspected use of chemical weapons against civilians. In contrast, 29% said they support airstrikes.
While President Obama said Tuesday he was “confident” he can muster the necessary votes from Congress for U.S. military action in Syria, the new Pew poll finds that his party is not fully on 29% of Democrats favor conducting airstrikes against Syria while 48% are opposed.
Republicans remain more divided, with 35% favoring airstrikes and 40% opposed.

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/09/03/new-poll-finds-nearly-half-of-americans-oppose-syria-strike/

 

[UncleBuck]

you posted a pdf from MSNBC, that's enough to show anyone you're full of shit. I posted a link to get all polls available, sure exposing your partisan lies was a perk but I am the only one being hones here you lying hack.

no, you're being stupid, not honest.

when asked specifically about a strike like obama wants, 50% of americans said yes.

that poll was done by a more reputable polling firm than gallup based on empirical evidence and track records.

it*was an NBC news poll.*http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/08/30/half-of-americans-oppose-broad-military-action-in-syria-poll-finds/

go ahead, click the link and make an ass out of yourself once again.

i am not lying, i am just posting the facts, and you are too stupid to realize that you even look stupid.

any moron can google "syria poll" and click on any number of polls.

but when asked SPECIFICALLY about striking syria in the manner which obama describes, support is at 50% of the american people.

go cry, dumbass.

 

[UncleBuck]

oh I will make the deal even sweeter. MSNBC showing that more americans opposed to strikes. BAHAHAHAHA so much fail

48% of Americans oppose military airstrikes in the country as a response to the Assad regime’s suspected use of chemical weapons against civilians. In contrast, 29% said they support airstrikes.
While President Obama said Tuesday he was “confident” he can muster the necessary votes from Congress for U.S. military action in Syria, the new Pew poll finds that his party is not fully on 29% of Democrats favor conducting airstrikes against Syria while 48% are opposed.
Republicans remain more divided, with 35% favoring airstrikes and 40% opposed.

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/09/03/new-poll-finds-nearly-half-of-americans-oppose-syria-strike/

when did obama propose airstrikes?

he's talking firing cruise missiles from ships, which is what the polling question i presented specifically asked.

are you too fucking dumb to even realize how dumb you look right now?

 

[nontheist]

So bucky where the hell is that ally list? Who is standing behind Obama on the strikes?

 

[UncleBuck]

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i//MSNBC/Sections/A_Politics/_Today_Stories_Teases/13336_NBC_Syria_Poll.pdf

Q9

58% of americans agree thatgassing your own is a "red line" which requires significant response which could include military action.

 

[UncleBuck]

So bucky where the hell is that ally list? Who is standing behind Obama on the strikes?

israel, for one.

there are about 9 others (so far).

at least 80 countries or organization have acknowledged that chemical weapons were used in Syria, more than 50 saying so publicly. At least 30 countries or organizations “have stated in public or private that the Assad regime is responsible,” and nine countries support U.S. military action, she said. Those nine are Australia, Albania, Kosovo, Canada, Denmark, France, Poland, Romania and Turkey

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-06/obama-seeks-support-for-syria-strikes-as-timeline-grows.html

nice try at trying to change the subject away from your massive failure with the polling, moron.

 

[nontheist]

when did obama propose airstrikes?

he's talking firing cruise missiles from ships, which is what the polling question i presented specifically asked.

are you too fucking dumb to even realize how dumb you look right now?

That was strait from MSNBC my friend you're looking like a drowning liar who won't even post the source of his PDF.

So far every poll shows most Americans want no fucking part of this, except your blind link to a PDF. derp derp

 

[Canna Sylvan]

when did obama propose airstrikes?

he's talking firing cruise missiles from ships, which is what the polling question i presented specifically asked.

are you too fucking dumb to even realize how dumb you look right now?

A fucking pussy just pushes a button. If Obama does this then I'll respect him. I still won't agree with him, but I will respect him. Otherwise, he's more of a loser than you.

 

[nontheist]

israel, for one.

there are about 9 others (so far).

at least 80 countries or organization have acknowledged that chemical weapons were used in Syria, more than 50 saying so publicly. At least 30 countries or organizations “have stated in public or private that the Assad regime is responsible,” and nine countries support U.S. military action, she said. Those nine are Australia, Albania, Kosovo, Canada, Denmark, France, Poland, Romania and Turkey

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-06/obama-seeks-support-for-syria-strikes-as-timeline-grows.html

nice try at trying to change the subject away from your massive failure with the polling, moron.

haha the web you're weaving, so what the fuck was the article you posted? It didn't mention a single ally.

cite something Bucky that makes some fucking sense with the bullshit you're posting.

 

[UncleBuck]

That was strait from MSNBC my friend you're looking like a drowning liar who won't even post the source of his PDF.

So far every poll shows most Americans want no fucking part of this, except your blind link to a PDF. derp derp

hart research associates/public opinion strategies.

an NBC news survey.

look at the very fucking top of the first page (or any paage, for that matter).

msnbc is just the one presenting it in their interweb space.

jesus christ you are insufferably dumb.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i//MSNBC/Sections/A_Politics/_Today_Stories_Teases/13336_NBC_Syria_Poll.pdf

fail some more for my amusement, i have plenty of beer left.

 

[UncleBuck]

haha the web you're weaving, so what the fuck was the article you posted? It didn't mention a single ally.

cite something Bucky that makes some fucking sense with the bullshit you're posting.

it actually mentioned 9 allies, idiot.

israel is on board too, obviously. you can google that yourself.

sleep it off and try again tomorrow. you don't handle your booze well.

 

[UncleBuck]

moving beyond nonthinkist's drunken inability to comprehend how polling data is labeled, or how different questions get different answers, or how websites sometimes present polls that others have done, let's get back to the OP.

lots of MSNBC anchors have come out against syria action.

how many FOX news morons did we see oppose iraq in any way, or even question it?*

how about, how many FOX anchors didn't personally cheerlead the rushed to war based on shady, shitty intelligence?

that's quite the contrast i'd say.

 

[nontheist]

hart research associates/public opinion strategies.

an NBC news survey.

look at the very fucking top of the first page (or any paage, for that matter).

msnbc is just the one presenting it in their interweb space.

jesus christ you are insufferably dumb.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i//MSNBC/Sections/A_Politics/_Today_Stories_Teases/13336_NBC_Syria_Poll.pdf

fail some more for my amusement, i have plenty of beer left.

bahaha that poll is a joke and outdated and even at that reflect most Americans don't want shit to do with it.

A link to tons of polls better managed, more up to date and less partisan. Only two publishers use hart research. Want any other evidence to make you look foolish?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=syria+poll

 

[nontheist]

moving beyond nonthinkist's drunken inability to comprehend how polling data is labeled, or how different questions get different answers, or how websites sometimes present polls that others have done, let's get back to the OP.

lots of MSNBC anchors have come out against syria action.

how many FOX news morons did we see oppose iraq in any way, or even question it?*

how about, how many FOX anchors didn't personally cheerlead the rushed to war based on shady, shitty intelligence?

that's quite the contrast i'd say.

really post a few more poll reflecting hart research trash you posted.

 

[nontheist]

it actually mentioned 9 allies, idiot.

israel is on board too, obviously. you can google that yourself.

sleep it off and try again tomorrow. you don't handle your booze well.

You mentioned all kinds of shit, it's the evidence you haven't come up with. I find it hard to believe if all 9 of these nations are fully committed why they need us to do the bombing for them.

 

[nontheist]

moving beyond nonthinkist's drunken inability to comprehend how polling data is labeled, or how different questions get different answers, or how websites sometimes present polls that others have done, let's get back to the OP.

lots of MSNBC anchors have come out against syria action.

how many FOX news morons did we see oppose iraq in any way, or even question it?*

how about, how many FOX anchors didn't personally cheerlead the rushed to war based on shady, shitty intelligence?

that's quite the contrast i'd say.

now your just being desperate, this isn't the subject at hand.

I have posted overwhelming evidence that Obama doesn't have the people support, you stating otherwise while proving shady/no sources.