UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i am just going by the definitions handed out by the right's most brilliant minds over at fox news.the definition of a "Landslide" sure has changed...
if getting 51% of the popular vote is a landslide, then getting 52% must be a super badass landslide deluxe.
times sure have changed since Ronald Reagan's Supreme Heroic Epic Ultimate Landslide in '84 of 59%
they predicted a "landslide" romney win with mormonbot taking about 325 electoral votes. go ahead, google it. i'll wait.
so when obama picked up 332 electoral votes, which are all that matter, i waited patiently for fox news to concede the obama landslide.
they never did, so i picked up their slack.
you can't court fox news all day and then cast them away when their very own words work against your retarded rhetoric.
that's a stupid thing to do, much like citing a creationist in a debate about science (which you did), or citing rushton in a debate about race and intelligence (which you also did).
it really should not be surprising anymore, but somehow i retain my sense of wonder. especially when you cite a man who says we need to defend "america's judeo-christian heritage and european identity" from blacks, muslims, and immigrants and then wonder why people know you to be a racist.
but i suppose defending*"america's judeo-christian heritage and european identity" from blacks, muslims, and immigrants is not much different than your thoughts about how we need to "defend REAL AMERICA from the multicultural wasteland of bullshit".
hell, that's basically a spot on rephrasing of what rushton says.