CBO Estimates More Than 80 Miilion Will Lose Their Healthcare

beenthere

New Member
Automobile speed is quantifiable.
"The masses" is a term that is evocative but fantastically imprecise.
Correct, automobile speed is quantifiable, but so is my question about what economic model has given more opportunity to the masses.
The term "more" indicates the expression of quantity.

Now, please point out how the term "masses" is evocative?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Now, please point out how the term "masses" is evocative?
e·voc·a·tive
iˈväkətiv/
adjective
adjective: evocative
1.
bringing strong images, memories, or feelings to mind.

im·pre·cise
ˌimpriˈsīs/
adjective
adjective: imprecise
1.
lacking exactness and accuracy of expression or detail.





seriously dude, are you 12 years old and playing an online persona or something?

no one can possibly be as dumb or shameless as you are.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
What? You are just not able to comprehend? Ashamed to admit I stopped beating your wife? What?

Question: what system has been better than the others?

I said, none so far. Clear and concise, to the point.... So, this sees a little goofy to me.
classic doer:clap:
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Question: So IYO, what economic model has given more opportunity to the masses than any other?

Answer: None so far.

Analogy:

Question: In your opinion, what is the fastest car you've heard of.

Answer: None so far.

Now that's a goofy fucking answer.
If all the cars go the same speed, cross at the same time, the answer to 'who is fastest?', is none so far, you goof ball.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
e·voc·a·tive
iˈväkətiv/
adjective
adjective: evocative
1.
bringing strong images, memories, or feelings to mind.

im·pre·cise
ˌimpriˈsīs/
adjective
adjective: imprecise
1.
lacking exactness and accuracy of expression or detail.





seriously dude, are you 12 years old and playing an online persona or something?

no one can possibly be as dumb or shameless as you are.
Maybe he is from Pooooolllaaannddd!
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
e·voc·a·tive
iˈväkətiv/
adjective
adjective: evocative
1.
bringing strong images, memories, or feelings to mind.

im·pre·cise
ˌimpriˈsīs/
adjective
adjective: imprecise
1.
lacking exactness and accuracy of expression or detail.





seriously dude, are you 12 years old and playing an online persona or something?

no one can possibly be as dumb or shameless as you are.
Fucking dictionaries, always getting the way of right wing rhetoric...
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You cannot propose a system, no one was born in the system, and there never was this system. It is actually and technically impossible, so a fantasy, of yours. And to think it applies to the rest of us is Tyranny.

And so for you to propose it, in the non-fact way, in public, does impact us. We get amused. And I don't have any endorsements, except to embrace reality.

BTW, Sophist, here is what you said. And what you said is there has been no benefit. That we cannot, until....blah blah.
So, now it seems like tap dance.

Society can only be benefited as a whole when all people are free to make choices, not have them made for them.
I await your example(s) of how all people benefit from unfree exchanges.
 

beenthere

New Member
If all the cars go the same speed, cross at the same time, the answer to 'who is fastest?', is none so far, you goof ball.
You're sounding like Rainman dude.

My question was, in your opinion, what is the fastest car you've heard of.

Now, I've heard of Volkswagen Beatles, Ford Pinto's, Volvo's and even Lamborghini Diablo's. What would be considered goofy to most guys is, either you've never heard of these cars or worse yet, you couldn't figure out which was faster between a VW Beatle and a Lamborghini Diablo.

Do you buy your underwear at K-Mart or what?
 

beenthere

New Member
e·voc·a·tive
iˈväkətiv/
adjective
adjective: evocative
1.
bringing strong images, memories, or feelings to mind.

im·pre·cise
ˌimpriˈsīs/
adjective
adjective: imprecise
1.
lacking exactness and accuracy of expression or detail.





seriously dude, are you 12 years old and playing an online persona or something?

no one can possibly be as dumb or shameless as you are.
Yeah, the word "masses" (common people) is profoundly evocative, it really kindles my brain to evoke memories of the past.

Do me a huge favor, please show this post to your father in-law.:oops:
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
You asked which form of govt is better at blah blah blah?

I said none have been better than the other, in my opinion, so far.

Are ya, DEEEF, boy?
 

beenthere

New Member
Question: So IYO, what economic model has given more opportunity to the masses than any other?

Answer: None so far.

Analogy:

Question: In your opinion, what is the fastest car you've heard of.

Answer: None so far.

Now that's a goofy fucking answer.


You asked which form of govt is better at blah blah blah?

I said none have been better than the other, in my opinion, so far.

Are ya, DEEEF, boy?
Nope, you blind?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yeah, the word "masses" (common people) is profoundly evocative, it really kindles my brain to evoke memories of the past.

Do me a huge favor, please show this post to your father in-law.:oops:
cannabineer called your usage of the term "masses" imprecise.

then you asked why it was so evocative.

think about that.

you really are dumber than shit.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
You asked which form of govt is better at blah blah blah?

I said none have been better than the other, in my opinion, so far.

Are ya, DEEEF, boy?
From my take on history it seems a good Ceasar led to the most freedom and peace. Too many bad Ceasars though to be a reliable system. IMO a representative republic worked pretty well for a little while.

I believe man is a pack animal and central planning requires a hive mentality that goes against our nature. I doubt we ever see our true potential as long as we insist on congregating massive power in small pockets.

I guess that's a way of saying no government central planning is going to be the better collective plan in the grand scheme of things.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Well, not impared at all. :) You followed it. We have never seen a system that is equitable to the under-classes. Why? Very simple.

For the underclasses only a complete reversal of fortune to pay back the oppression is equitable to them. It is Power structure.
And the ones at the bottom, only want the top. And the only recourse is loot, plunder, rape and pillage. And we see that here in the USA.

I have not idea what the masses are. That is a Marxist term.

But, no system has solved this one yet. So all are equal at Zero. The only light so far, is to insist on this idea of generational weatlh gathering. A slow push up the pole of family progress.

And then come the social tinkers, the mind fuckers and the emotion tramplers. And that bullshit leads right back to tyranny.
 

greenlikemoney

Well-Known Member
You are smoking crack if you think that. Fantasy. He cannot crash and burn unless and until, the Senate switches 6 seats.
Based on reports out of Washington today, Obamas liberal buddys have given him until Friday to get his shit together or they are jumping ship ( theres an election next year also ).....TOTAL FAIL......CRASH AND BURN.......FAILED SOCIALISM.
 

beenthere

New Member
cannabineer called your usage of the term "masses" imprecise.

then you asked why it was so evocative.

think about that.

you really are dumber than shit.
Here is cannabineers's statement moron, clearly defining the term "the masses' as evocative.
He was also stupid enough to point out that automobile speed is quantifiable, therefore qualifying my question.

You internet pseudo intellects are a dime a dozen. If you guys were half as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't find yourselves wasting that immense brilliance policing grammar on a stone forum.

Automobile speed is quantifiable.
"The masses" is a term that is evocative but fantastically imprecise.
 
Top