Doer
Well-Known Member
No. You are being a sociopath. Just tap dance.Dude, I gave you the same treatment you gave me, what's the little bitch fit all about?
Go back and read your bullshit. See what you did.
No. You are being a sociopath. Just tap dance.Dude, I gave you the same treatment you gave me, what's the little bitch fit all about?
Oh sure, you big fat liar. Why do I bitch? Only at guys in your special club. Head up ass.Damn, those were the days.
I'll tell ya what Doer, you answer my initial question, in return I will gladly answer yours.No. You are being a sociopath. Just tap dance.
Go back and read your bullshit. See what you did.
OK. Let us see.I'll tell ya what Doer, you answer my initial question, in return I will gladly answer yours.
It can't get any more reasonable than this.
Ok, I still believe you are dodging my question.OK. Let us see.
Is there any govt, political system etc, that has done better with the masses? (Not exact. Good enough?)
No system has done better at this so far, than any other, in my opinion.
That was my only point until you started personal attacks. That I guarantee, you would never get away with, to my face.
You began Stupidity, because you pretended not understand my answer. And you are a coward with those comments about liberal arts and no pussy for years. You hide in forum. Just immature lashing out.
And is anyone supporting you on this? No. We see sour grapes. We see you can't stand the heat.
And we all know you have no experience on these subjects, so, you provide no content beyond spew.
I don't praise sigs often. Props. While everyone is focused on O'care, something is going on.Well. You fell for it. We are supposed to blame POTUS, don't you get it? He can't be held to account very easily, and actually we have never removed a President.
That is why the powerful laugh at your ideas of blame. It means you are in thought checkmate.
Buck, those are horrible, I thought you were a better grower than that, ever heard of nitrogen?
i love you beenthere.
You are going to argue on the basis of cost? Wouldn't it be much cheaper to just have government eliminate the infirm? That would leave a job opening for someone without a disease which would create even a better living standard for the rest of us. Population growth is a huge problem that causes all sorts of nasty effects. Wouldn't eliminating lives already in the shitter be better for everyone?But no, it is better always to ignore problems that cost very little to maintain until they get to be big problems that always incur more cost, right?
Dude, this only proves your knowledge of cannabis is quite limited.Buck, those are horrible, I thought you were a better grower than that, ever heard of nitrogen?
Wow...deep comprehension, this is not. How does it take you this long?Ok, I still believe you are dodging my question.
Your answer concludes that you cannot distinguish the difference between, communism, socialism (any type) or capitalism of any type.
Is that right?
You are dimmed to simply ironic joking, as well. Nothing personal.Dude, this only proves your knowledge of cannabis is quite limited.
I dont think so. I think he understood quite well and answered quite appropriately.You are dimmed to simply ironic joking, as well. Nothing personal.
No, actually your picture proves you grow sickly yellow moldy weed.Dude, this only proves your knowledge of cannabis is quite limited.
On the contrary my friend.No, actually your picture proves you grow sickly yellow moldy weed.
yeah, you grow sickly yellow moldy weedThe plant in that old picture is from the early 1980's 1981-1982 to be more precise, grown by myself in Mendo county.
I've tried to make this point to some of these rookie know it all's many times.I normally try not to get involved in thread derailment, but since I started the thread and it has been derailed the entire time....
I don't know how you can see mold on those buds. If that is the case, well then, I can't see it myself but my eyes aren't what they used to be...
As far as yellowing...
I believe in the very old saying "jack of all trades, master of none".
A good botanist can grow good tomatoes, peaches, oranges, azaelas, cannabis, tulips, shrubs, etc.etc.etc.
and each and everyone of them would be good.
A specialty grower, in this case cannabis, will tweak his grows specifically for cannabis.
While this doesn't apply to all the other stuff that a botanist can grow well, it does for cannabis.
I know this is the politics section and facts generally do not apply or actually convert the debaters, but....
Higher nitrogen levels at the end of flowering results in lower thc levels. That is a fact, scientifically proven.
When you get to a certain stage of growing, which isn't really difficult, you will not make leaps and bounds improvements. You are already past that point. At that stage the only way to improve is to make small tweaks which make even smaller improvements. But those small tweaks keep adding up until you actually can tell a small but discernable difference.
Feel free to confirm what I have said. There are studies.
Higher the nitrogen level at the end of flowering, the lower the THC levels.
These studies were done in a way to LOWER thc levels in hemp, so if you are growing hemp you would want HIGH nitrogen levels to lower the thc percentage and increase stem growth.
So in conclusion, if your leaves aren't yellowing at the end of flower, you can improve your overall bud quality. Unless you are growing hemp for the stems.
So, you don't cut back nitrogen for blooming?I dont think so. I think he understood quite well and answered quite appropriately.
So, fake reasonable as we well knew.Wow...deep comprehension, this is not. How does it take you this long?
Correct as you knew, days ago.
So I answered. Let's see if you can be reasonable or not. Can you admit to the level of experience you have in this life, or not?
So, athos, this reply, says he did not realize the ironic joking about the idea of withholding Nitrogen for bloom.Dude, this only proves your knowledge of cannabis is quite limited.