Search results

The majority of cannabis consumers don't consume LP products, and it's got nothing to do with a "shortage".

That's also where they bottle his dollar beer.

To insecure and intolerant to handle disagreement, eh?

Because a stranger on the internet says so? That speaks volumes about where your own self-esteem stands. No, this is not the highlight of my day. Is it yours?

Can't handle disagreement, eh? Well, I'm neither your parent nor your therapist. Sorry.

Cognitive dissonance, eh? Get a clue. A few puffs of bunk weed never killed anyone. Claiming it does makes you sound as hysterical as cops falsely claiming marijuana is laced with harder drugs.

Who are you trying to impress by typing in all-caps? Yeah, you need to calm down. The world is not bound to your whims. The sky will not fall and a couple of puff won't kill me.

So, the sky is falling because I had a sample? Yeah, calm down. You sound like a prohibitionist who's caught Reefer Madness. Like I said, it was unimpressive. I've had better ditch weed. I can't imagine their sales are as high as they would like us to imagine. I think they aren't able to meet...

Maybe. That certainly could explain why only 2 out of his 6 seeds germinated. But, it wouldn't make any sense. The seeds are grown in Canada, so there's little chance of soil contamination. Also, irradiation is employed to produce unviable seeds, such as for hempseeds used in birdseed.

Got my hands on two strains from an LP, one packaged in November and another recently... I have my doubts they were grown by the same people. The first had a decent flavour and aroma, but it had a faint organic fertilizer aftertaste (I'm guessing most people wouldn't know). Not bad at all. Still...

Wow. Is this a new one? What's with this focus on the US? We have stats of our own now. For example, there hasn't been a satistically significant increase in roadside arrests since legalisation. This is in spite of the soon to be challenged law, which was ostensibly aimed at increasing the...

They are right. If Vancouver could sell dispensary licenses when cannabis stores were still illegal federally, they as a nation can do as they please on their sovereign territory.

With rethoric like that, they're out of their minds if they think that the contrarians that make up the bulk of the cannabis community will be flocking to their stores to buy their "legal" produce (and let's be honest, buds are an agricultural product and should be treated as such). We're...

"“It is quite surprising that an academic study would be shared to the media prior to being published in this fashion. It is very unusual and most likely is related to a corporate strategy,” he said." That comment doesn't inspire confidence in me as a consumer. Yes, whistleblowers don't always...

I've read articles in which they published the names of people who get ticketed for cannabis. It doesn't go one's criminal record, but they plaster one's name on the internet, breaching one's privacy. That's cruel. Imagine if they stigmatized people who got a speeding ticket like that.

When all is said and done, one should file formal complaints with whichever government agency oversees this organisation on the grounds that their anti-marijuana propaganda should be considered hate speech against cannabis consumers and patients.

It's all unnecessary. Alcohol sales have dropped and will continue to do so now that cannabis is legal. Sure, they can claim having levels of 5ng of THC per mL in one's blood makes one dangerous on the road, but the Olympic Committee allows its athletes to have 150ng of THC per mL in their...

I keep seeing MADD being mentioned in the news this week and this came up as I was trying to figure the group out. Interesting read. https://www.activistfacts.com/organizations/17-mothers-against-drunk-driving/ Disclaimer: The website at the above link is run by a nonprofit funded by the...

Remember, he's just as aware as you and I that nearly everyone involved in the blackmarket aren't "criminals".

Once again, the provinces who receive those funds are actually receiving less than what would be equitable from the federal government when we look at all allocations to provinces. Why would they stop accepting those funds unless there are assurances they'll receive what's equitable in exchange...