Search results

LOL, I'm laughing here because I think he's calling you out for pics of you burying an actual dead skunk in a pot, and that you expected such a setup to grow some skunky weed. This thread is great for humor, I tell ya.

Hmm, I dunno, Maybe he is just testing the waters? I've spent an outrageous amount of money with him trying to put all those strains into storage. I'm also not about to spend $500 on GDP. *Maybe* for Green Crack though... ;-)

I sure hope he puts Green Crack on that offerings list at some point. He has an impressive collection of clones, and they date back a long time now...

Looks like AG is getting into the clone game for a portion of their customer base.

AK Bean Brains has Super Skunk crosses. I think his is from one of the original seedbanks though? I am not 100% sure. I saw double serrated leaves on one of the Black Domina x Super Skunk crosses I started this year. Both turned out to be male, so no review from me yet, but the plants were...

I got two males. :-( I had about a 70% males this go-round. I am going to have to go back to hunting one strain at a time to add to my outdoor selections next year. I kinda just popped a bunch of stuff in a panic when I thought I wasn't testing enough new things. :-) They were very vigorous...

Those are Pietri's words, not mine. Copy pasta. I am done with this thread. You have made up your mind anyway. I am sure your flowers are far superior because you spend more on electricity.

I would not hesitate to blow up a whole warehouse with this style, but I am already set for life and like I say, weed is a hobby. Also, who is to say that nobody is doing this? Maybe they don't want to give up competitive advantage.

Probably because when people like me try and tell others, we are dismissed out of hand just like has happened with this thread.

I will use a 315 CMH and 200 watt LED in. 3.5x3.5. Or 4 315s in a row in a 3.5x10 space

The fact that you have to resort to ad hominem attacks and have nothing else tells people like me all we need to know, BTW. Funny that you don't see it. Many people caught in that trap today, their egos won't let them accept any new information they didn't find out on their own. It's sad really...

I have said more than once that I don't listen to anything else Pietri has to say. I have read his books and there is more information available. I have purchased the Greenhouse Management textbook also and it confirms much of what he claims about short day long night plant varieties. That is...

I didn't come up with this. Others have done the research. https://www.growlikejoe.com/growing/

All 8 hours of light per day in flower.

Well, I grow weed and I do it with 13 hours per day in veg, and 8 hours per day in flower. And I'm still happy with my results. You pay more in electricity and we likely have similar results. It's going to be okay.

It's my opinion on what is happening and I'm just relating my experience with switching my light schedule. You seem to have an axe to grind but I don't hear you telling us what you've done or why your methods are better or more efficient. You're just making low value noise.

Those flower pics are at 63 days for strains that normally go 70. I have noticed that this light schedule seems to come with the benefit of faster finishing. I have witnessed it myself. The link I just posted also suggests the same.

http://www.growlikejoe.com/tips-2/

I got nothing to prove to you or anyone else.